issues
50 rows where repo = 140912432, state = "open" and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
722816436 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjI4MTY0MzY= | 186 | .extract() shouldn't extract null values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-10-16T02:41:08Z | 2021-08-12T12:32:14Z | OWNER | This almost works, but it creates a rogue |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/186/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
961008507 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NjEwMDg1MDc= | 308 | Add an interactive tutorial as a Jupyter notebook | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-08-04T20:34:22Z | 2021-08-04T21:30:59Z | OWNER | Can show people how to open this up in Binder. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/308/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
816601354 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTgwMjM1NDI3 | 241 | Extract expand - work in progress | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | 2021-02-25T16:36:38Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/241 | Refs #239. Still needs documentation and CLI implementation. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/241/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | ||||||
472115381 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NzIxMTUzODE= | 49 | extracts= should support multiple-column extracts | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 10 | 2019-07-24T07:06:41Z | 2020-10-16T19:18:19Z | OWNER | Lookup tables can be constructed on compound columns, but the Right now extracts can be defined in two ways: ```python Extract these columns into tables with the same name:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts=["breed", "most_recent_trophy"]) Same as above but with custom table names:dogs = db.table("dogs", extracts={"breed": "Breeds", "most_recent_trophy": "Trophies"}) ``` Need some kind of syntax for much more complicated extractions, like when two columns (say "source" and "source_version") are extracted into a single table. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
573578548 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzM1Nzg1NDg= | 89 | Ability to customize columns used by extracts= feature | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-03-01T16:54:48Z | 2020-10-16T19:17:50Z | OWNER | @simonw any thoughts on allow extracts to specify the lookup column name? If I'm understanding the documentation right, Initial thought on how to do this would be to allow the dictionary value to be a tuple of table name column pair... so:
I haven't dug too much into the existing code yet, but does this make sense? Worth doing? Originally posted by @chrishas35 in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-592999503 |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/89/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
581795570 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODE3OTU1NzA= | 93 | Support more string values for types in .add_column() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-03-15T19:32:49Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/2.4.2/python-api.html#adding-columns says:
As discovered in #92 this isn't the right list of values. I should expand this to match https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/93/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
652961907 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NTI5NjE5MDc= | 121 | Improved (and better documented) support for transactions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-07-08T04:56:51Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:46Z | OWNER | Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/118#issuecomment-655283393 We should put some thought into how this library supports and encourages smart use of transactions. |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/121/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
688352145 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODgzNTIxNDU= | 141 | insert-files support for compressed values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-08-28T20:59:46Z | 2020-09-24T20:36:08Z | OWNER | The |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/141/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
695441530 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU0NDE1MzA= | 154 | OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-09-07T23:42:44Z | 2020-09-07T23:47:10Z | OWNER | I'm getting this error when running:
I'm worried that maybe that's because of this new code from #152: |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/154/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
644161221 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDQxNjEyMjE= | 117 | Support for compound (composite) foreign keys | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-06-23T21:33:42Z | 2020-06-23T21:40:31Z | OWNER | It turns out SQLite supports composite foreign keys: https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_composite Their example looks like this: ```sql CREATE TABLE album( albumartist TEXT, albumname TEXT, albumcover BINARY, PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname) ); CREATE TABLE song( songid INTEGER, songartist TEXT, songalbum TEXT, songname TEXT, FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname) ); ``` Here's what that looks like in sqlite-utils: ``` In [1]: import sqlite_utils In [2]: import sqlite3 In [3]: conn = sqlite3.connect(":memory:") In [4]: conn In [5]: conn.executescript("""
...: CREATE TABLE album(
...: albumartist TEXT,
...: albumname TEXT,
...: albumcover BINARY,
...: PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname)
...: );
...: In [6]: db = sqlite_utils.Database(conn) In [7]: db.tables |
sqlite-utils 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);