github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
956832836 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTY4MzI4MzY= | 300 | Returning underlying cause for User Defined Functions | 71236 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2021-07-30T15:08:21Z | 2021-08-02T21:53:50Z | 2021-08-02T21:53:50Z | NONE | The sqlite3 client takes user defined functions and replaces the text with "user-defined function raised exception`" so it's not apparent what's gone wrong: ``` Unexpected error: user-defined function raised exception ``` As mentioned in https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29500 and https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45824209/how-to-get-an-error-kind-from-sqlite-create-function/45834923#45834923 the workaround for this is to enable callback tracebacks: ``` sqlite3.enable_callback_tracebacks(True) ``` It would be nice if https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/python-api.html#registering-custom-sql-functions either included a reference to `enable_callback_tracebacks` or if registering a user defined function set this flag automatically. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/300/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
957741820 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTc3NDE4MjA= | 305 | Python: need a way to execute a count with an extra where clause | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2021-08-02T04:52:02Z | 2021-08-02T05:08:22Z | 2021-08-02T05:08:22Z | OWNER | I need this for #304. I'll probably add this to the `.execute_count()` method as `where=` and `where_args=`. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/305/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
957536983 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzAwOTQ0NjQ0 | 303 | sqlite-utils convert command and db[table].convert(...) method | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2021-08-01T16:52:42Z | 2021-08-02T04:47:42Z | 2021-08-02T04:47:39Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/303 | Refs #251, #302. - [x] Get recipes working - [x] Document recipes - [x] Implement `db[table].convert(...)` method - [x] Add tests for recipes that use the new Python method - [x] Implement `db[table].convert(..., multi=True)` mechanism - [x] Documentation for `db[table].convert(...)` - [x] Refactor `sqlite-utils convert` to use the new method | 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/303/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||
957529248 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTc1MjkyNDg= | 302 | Python library version of `sqlite-utils convert` | 9599 | closed | 0 | 9599 | 1 | 2021-08-01T16:11:02Z | 2021-08-02T04:47:40Z | 2021-08-02T04:47:40Z | OWNER | Spin off from #251. The ability to execute Python functions to convert and split columns should be part of the library too, not just the CLI. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/302/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |