github
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996084899 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 | 996084899 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xwyj | 9599 | 2021-12-16T18:48:14Z | 2021-12-16T18:48:14Z | OWNER | Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/20a2ed6bec367d2f6759be4a879364a72780b59d/docs/facets.rst#facets-in-metadatajson | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1078702875 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996077053 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 | 996077053 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xu39 | 9599 | 2021-12-16T18:36:41Z | 2021-12-16T18:36:41Z | OWNER | ... actually no, I WILL document this, because not documenting this is what got us to this point in the first place! | { "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1078702875 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996076373 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 | 996076373 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XutV | 9599 | 2021-12-16T18:35:40Z | 2021-12-16T18:35:40Z | OWNER | I'm going to ship your fix now, but I'm not going to add this to the documentation yet because I hope to improve the design prior to Datasette 1.0. | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1078702875 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996046304 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 | 996046304 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnXg | 9599 | 2021-12-16T17:53:40Z | 2021-12-16T18:16:12Z | OWNER | I'm also not convinced that this configuration syntax is right. It's a bit weird having a `"facets"` list that can either by column-name-strings or `{"type-of-facet": "column-name"}` objects. Maybe there's a better design for this? Part of the problem here is that facets were designed to accept optional extra configuration - partly to support `m2m` facets in #495 - but I haven't actually shipped any facets that use that ability. Facet by delimiter would be a good one to exercise that ability: - #510 | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1078702875 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996045776 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 | 996045776 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnPQ | 9599 | 2021-12-16T17:52:54Z | 2021-12-16T17:52:54Z | OWNER | I tried that fix you suggested and now this `metadata.json` does the right thing: ```json { "databases": { "fixtures": { "tables": { "facetable": { "facets": [ { "array": "tags" } ] } } } } } ``` It does further highlight the bug in #625 though - since then if you try to add `?_facet=tags` to facet by tags treating them NOT as an array your request to do so is ignored. | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1078702875 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996034408 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 | 996034408 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xkdo | 9599 | 2021-12-16T17:37:37Z | 2021-12-16T17:37:37Z | OWNER | I think you're right! I had completely forgotten that piece of code. This just turned into a bug fix and a documentation update. Thanks for the research! | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1078702875 |