github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1109808154 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5CJlQa | 1608 | Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ | 9599 | closed | 0 | 15 | 2022-01-20T22:02:59Z | 2023-03-26T23:41:12Z | 2022-01-20T22:53:17Z | OWNER | It's not currently clear what the difference between https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/ and https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/ is - I should fix that. On Twitter: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1484285006243528705 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1633077183 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5hVse_ | 2041 | Remove obsolete table POST code | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8755003 | 2 | 2023-03-21T01:01:40Z | 2023-03-21T01:17:44Z | 2023-03-21T01:17:43Z | OWNER | Spotted this in: - #1999 `POST /db/table` currently executes obsolete code for inserting a row - I replaced that with `/db/table/-/insert` in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/6e788b49edf4f842c0817f006eb9d865778eea5e but forgot to remove the old code. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2041/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1615891776 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5gUI1A | 2037 | Test failure: FAILED tests/test_cli.py::test_install_requirements - FileNotFoundError | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2023-03-08T20:30:06Z | 2023-03-09T22:33:39Z | 2023-03-09T22:33:39Z | OWNER | > FAILED tests/test_cli.py::test_install_requirements - FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory From https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/4348548218/jobs/7597208191 ``` =================================== FAILURES =================================== __________________________ test_install_requirements ___________________________ run_module = <MagicMock name='run_module' id='139768358191936'> @mock.patch("datasette.cli.run_module") def test_install_requirements(run_module): runner = CliRunner() > with runner.isolated_filesystem(): /home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_cli.py:184: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.9.16/x64/lib/python3.9/contextlib.py:119: in __enter__ return next(self.gen) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <click.testing.CliRunner object at 0x7f1e5bfb9490>, temp_dir = None @contextlib.contextmanager def isolated_filesystem( self, temp_dir: t.Optional[t.Union[str, os.PathLike]] = None ) -> t.Iterator[str]: """A context manager that creates a temporary directory and changes the current working directory to it. This isolates tests that affect the contents of the CWD to prevent them from interfering with each other. :param temp_dir: Create the temporary directory under this directory. If given, the created directory is not removed when exiting. .. versionchanged:: 8.0 Added the ``temp_dir`` parameter. """ > cwd = os.getcwd() E FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.9.16/x64/lib/python3.9/site-packages/click/testing.py:466: FileNotFoundError ``` Not sure why it only affected the "[Calculate test coverage](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/workflows/test-coverage.yml)" one. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2037/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1615862295 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5gUBoX | 2036 | `publish cloudrun` reuses image tags, which can lead to very surprising deploy problems | 9599 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2023-03-08T20:11:44Z | 2023-03-08T20:57:34Z | 2023-03-08T20:57:34Z | OWNER | See this issue: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette.io/issues/141 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2036/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1612296210 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5gGbAS | 2033 | `datasette install -r requirements.txt` | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2023-03-06T22:17:17Z | 2023-03-06T22:54:52Z | 2023-03-06T22:27:34Z | OWNER | Would be useful for cases where you want to install a whole set of plugins in one go, e.g. when running tutorials in GitHub Codespaces. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2033/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1594383280 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5fCFuw | 2030 | How to use Datasette with apache webserver on GCP? | 19700859 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2023-02-22T03:08:49Z | 2023-02-22T21:54:39Z | 2023-02-22T21:54:39Z | NONE | Hi Simon and Datasette team- I have installed apache2 webserver inside GCP VM using apt. I can see my "Hello World" index.html if I use the external IP of this GCP in a browser. However, when I try to run datasette with different combinations of -h and -p, I am still unable to access the webpage. I cannot invest Docker on this VM. Any pointers to use datasette with already existing apache2 webserver on GCP is appreciated. Thanks. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2030/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1579695809 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5eKD7B | 2023 | Error: Invalid setting 'hash_urls' in settings.json in 0.64.1 | 80409402 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2023-02-10T13:35:01Z | 2023-02-10T15:40:00Z | 2023-02-10T15:39:59Z | NONE | On a Debian machine, using datasette 0.64.1 installed with `pip3`, I am getting a `datasette[114272]: Error: Invalid setting 'hash_urls' in settings.json` in `journalctl -xe`. The same settings work on 0.54.1 on another Debian server. This is my `settings.json`: ```json { "default_page_size": 200, "max_returned_rows": 8000, "num_sql_threads": 3, "sql_time_limit_ms": 1000, "default_facet_size": 30, "facet_time_limit_ms": 200, "facet_suggest_time_limit_ms": 50, "hash_urls": false, "allow_facet": true, "allow_download": true, "suggest_facets": true, "default_cache_ttl": 5, "default_cache_ttl_hashed": 31536000, "cache_size_kb": 0, "allow_csv_stream": true, "max_csv_mb": 100, "truncate_cells_html": 2048, "force_https_urls": false, "template_debug": false, "base_url": "/pclim/db/" } ``` This looks ok to me. Would you have any ideas? | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2023/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1578609658 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5eF6v6 | 2022 | Error 500 - not clear the cause | 1667631 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2023-02-09T20:57:17Z | 2023-02-09T21:13:50Z | 2023-02-09T21:13:50Z | NONE | On the database that I have sent via linkedIn, datasette works great, but the following URL gives a 500 error. http://127.0.0.1:8001/literature/authors_papers?authorId=100550354 The cause of the error is not apparent. Is this expected behaviour? David | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2022/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1034535001 | I_kwDOBm6k_c49qcBZ | 1497 | Publish to Docker Hub failing with "libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file" | 9599 | closed | 0 | 18 | 2021-10-24T22:57:07Z | 2023-01-18T17:13:45Z | 2021-10-24T23:36:55Z | OWNER | This means the Datasette 0.59.1 release has not been published to Docker Hub. Here's where that failed: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/runs/3991043374?check_suite_focus=true ``` Preparing to unpack .../libc6_2.32-4_amd64.deb ... debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Dialog debconf: (TERM is not set, so the dialog frontend is not usable.) debconf: falling back to frontend: Readline debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Readline debconf: (Can't locate Term/ReadLine.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Term::ReadLine module) (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28.1 /usr/local/share/perl/5.28.1 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.28 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28 /usr/share/perl/5.28 /usr/local/lib/site_perl /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base) at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Readline.pm line 7.) debconf: falling back to frontend: Teletype Checking for services that may need to be restarted... Checking init scripts... Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.32-4) over (2.28-10) ... Setting up libc6:amd64 (2.32-4) ... /usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing package libc6:amd64 (--configure): installed libc6:amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: libc6:amd64 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The command '/bin/sh -c apt-get update && apt-get -y --no-install-recommends install software-properties-common && add-apt-repository "deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid main" && apt-get update && apt-get -t sid install -y --no-install-recommends libsqlite3-mod-spatialite && apt-get remove -y software-properties-common && apt clean && rm -rf /var/lib/apt && rm -rf /var/lib/dpkg/info/*' returned a non-zero code: 100 ``` Same problem when I attempted to publish using the "Push specific Docker tag" workflow… | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1497/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1529452371 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5bKZdT | 1987 | installpython3.com is now a spam website | 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2023-01-11T17:55:12Z | 2023-01-11T18:29:26Z | 2023-01-11T18:29:25Z | OWNER | Need to stop linking to it from the docs. I'll link to https://www.python.org/about/gettingstarted/ instead. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1987/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1528448642 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5bGkaC | 1985 | Don't let Datasette(path) without a list cause weird errors | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2023-01-11T05:17:44Z | 2023-01-11T18:25:04Z | 2023-01-11T18:25:04Z | OWNER | I got a confusing `sqlite3.OperationalError: disk I/O error` error in my tests, it turned out it was because this: ```python ds = Datasette(path) ``` Should have been this: ```python ds = Datasette([path]) ``` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-faiss/issues/1#issuecomment-1378252673_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1985/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1515185383 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5aT-Tn | 1971 | Upgrade for Sphinx 6.0 (once Furo has support for it) | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-12-31T19:04:35Z | 2023-01-10T02:02:34Z | 2023-01-10T02:02:34Z | OWNER | A deployment of #1967 to ReadTheDocs just failed like this: https://readthedocs.org/projects/datasette/builds/19045460/ ``` Running Sphinx v6.0.0 making output directory... done building [mo]: targets for 0 po files that are out of date building [html]: targets for 28 source files that are out of date updating environment: [new config] 28 added, 0 changed, 0 removed reading sources... [ 3%] authentication reading sources... [ 7%] binary_data reading sources... [ 10%] changelog Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/datasette/envs/latest/lib/python3.9/site-packages/docutils/statemachine.py", line 299, in next_line self.line = self.input_lines[self.line_offset] File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/datasette/envs/latest/lib/python3.9/site-packages/docutils/statemachine.py", line 1136, in __getitem__ return self.data[i] IndexError: list index out of range During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/datasette/envs/latest/lib/python3.9/site-packages/docutils/statemachine.py", line 226, in run self.next_line() File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/datasette/envs/latest/lib/python3.9/site-packages/docutils/statemachine.py", line 302, in next_line raise EOFError EOFError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/datasette/envs/latest/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sphinx/cmd/build.py", line 281, in build_main app.build(args.force_all, args.filenames) File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/datasette/envs/latest/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sphinx/application.py", line 344, in build self.builder.build_update() File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/datasette/envs/latest/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sphinx/bu… | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1971/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
710650633 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTA2NTA2MzM= | 979 | Default table view JSON should include CREATE TABLE | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2020-09-28T23:54:58Z | 2023-01-09T15:32:39Z | 2023-01-09T15:32:22Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable.json doesn't currently include the CREATE TABLE statement for the page, even though it's available on the HTML version at https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/979/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1522778923 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5aw8Mr | 1978 | Document datasette.urls.row and row_blob | 25778 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2023-01-06T15:45:51Z | 2023-01-09T14:30:00Z | 2023-01-09T14:30:00Z | CONTRIBUTOR | These are in the codebase but not in documentation. I think everything else in this class is documented. ```python class Urls: ... def row(self, database, table, row_path, format=None): path = f"{self.table(database, table)}/{row_path}" if format is not None: path = path_with_format(path=path, format=format) return PrefixedUrlString(path) def row_blob(self, database, table, row_path, column): return self.table(database, table) + "/{}.blob?_blob_column={}".format( row_path, urllib.parse.quote_plus(column) ) ``` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1978/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
not_planned | ||||||
1524076587 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5a15Ar | 1979 | More useful error message if enable_load_extension is not available | 9599 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2023-01-07T19:13:19Z | 2023-01-08T00:21:23Z | 2023-01-08T00:21:23Z | OWNER | I get this from: datasette --load-extension spatialite --get /-/versions.json ``` File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/datasette/app.py", line 614, in _prepare_connection conn.enable_load_extension(True) AttributeError: 'sqlite3.Connection' object has no attribute 'enable_load_extension' ``` It would be useful if Datasette caught this error and output something more friendly. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1979/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
957310278 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczMTAyNzg= | 1409 | `default_allow_sql` setting (a re-imagining of the old `allow_sql` setting) | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3268330 | 10 | 2021-07-31T19:48:56Z | 2023-01-07T18:06:01Z | 2023-01-05T00:51:31Z | OWNER | In 49d6d2f7b0f6cb02e25022e1c9403811f1fa0a7c as part of #813 I removed the `allow_sql` setting - on the basis that users could disable the ability to execute custom SQL queries using the new permission system instead. I don't think this was the right decision. Disabling custom SQL is an important security capability, and explaining how to do it using permissions is significantly more complex than letting people know they can add `--setting allow_sql off`. So I want to bring that setting back - maybe with a different, better name - and have it modify the default for that option if the permissions system doesn't have an opinion. That way people can still use the setting but then use permissions to allow specific signed-in users access to execute SQL. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1409/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1515182998 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5aT9uW | 1970 | Path "None" in _internal database table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-12-31T18:51:05Z | 2022-12-31T19:22:58Z | 2022-12-31T18:52:49Z | OWNER | See https://latest.datasette.io/_internal/databases (after https://latest.datasette.io/login-as-root) <img width="551" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/210153171-625d3706-8b1a-4c80-9662-46985350f6b6.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1970/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1501900064 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZhS0g | 1966 | Broken link to live demo in Getting started docs | 7551922 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2022-12-18T13:17:00Z | 2022-12-31T19:15:19Z | 2022-12-31T19:15:10Z | NONE | The link in [Play with a live demo in Getting started](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/docs/getting_started.rst#play-with-a-live-demo) to [https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight](https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight) is broken and the datasette is no longer working (maybe due to the end of the free tier). | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1966/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1515186569 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5aT-mJ | 1972 | Fix Sphinx warning about extlink extension | 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2022-12-31T19:12:04Z | 2022-12-31T19:13:26Z | 2022-12-31T19:13:26Z | OWNER | ``` [sphinx-autobuild] > sphinx-build -b html /Users/simon/Dropbox/Development/datasette/docs /Users/simon/Dropbox/Development/datasette/docs/_build Running Sphinx v5.3.0 loading pickled environment... done WARNING: extlinks: Sphinx-6.0 will require a caption string to contain exactly one '%s' and all other '%' need to be escaped as '%%'. ``` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1971#issuecomment-1368266904_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1972/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1496652622 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZNRtO | 1955 | invoke_startup() is not run in some conditions, e.g. gunicorn/uvicorn workers, breaking lots of things | 32839123 | closed | 0 | 36 | 2022-12-14T13:39:56Z | 2022-12-19T04:34:16Z | 2022-12-18T02:45:18Z | NONE | In the past (pre-september 14, #1809) I had a running deployment of Datasette on Azure WebApps by emulating the call in cli.py to Gunicorn: `gunicorn -w 2 -k uvicorn.workers.UvicornWorker app:app`. My most recent deployment, however, fails loudly by shouting that `Datasette.invoke_startup()` was not called. It does not seem to be possible to call `invoke_startup` when running using a uvicorn command directly like this (I've reproduced this locally using `uvicorn`). Two candidates that I have tried: * Uvicorn has a `--factory` option, but the app factory has to be synchronous, so no `await invoke_startup` there * `asyncio.get_event_loop().run_until_complete` is also not an option because `uvicorn` already has the event loop running. One additional option is: * Use Gunicorn's [server hooks](https://docs.gunicorn.org/en/stable/settings.html#server-hooks) to call `invoke_startup`. These are also synchronous, but I might be able to get ahead of the event loop starting here. In my current deployment setup, it does not appear to be possible to use `datasette serve` directly, so I'm stuck either * Trying to rework my complete deployment setup, for instance, using Azure functions as described [here](https://github.com/simonw/azure-functions-datasette)) * Or dig into the ASGI spec and write a wrapper for the sole purpose of launching Datasette using a direct Uvicorn invocation. Questions for the maintainers: * Is this intended behaviour/will not support/etc.? If so, I'd be happy to add a PR with a couple lines in the documentation. * if this is not intended behaviour, what is a good way to fix it? I could have a go at the ASGI spec thing (I think the Azure Functions thing is related) and provide a PR with the wrapper here, but I'm all ears! Almost forgot, minimal reproducer: ```python from datasette import Datasette ds = Datasette(files=['./global-power-plants.db'])] app = ds.app() ``` Save as app.py in the same folder as global-power-plants.db, and then try running `uvicorn app:app`. O… | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1955/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1306984363 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5N5v-r | 1771 | minor a11y: <select> has no visual indicator when tabbed to | 1473102 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2022-07-17T04:30:14Z | 2022-12-18T06:34:20Z | 2022-12-18T06:28:12Z | NONE | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1771/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||||
1501713288 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZglOI | 1963 | 0.63.3 bugfix release | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-12-18T02:48:15Z | 2022-12-18T03:26:55Z | 2022-12-18T03:26:55Z | OWNER | I'm going to ship a release which back-ports these two fixes: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1958 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1955 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1963/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
806849424 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MDY4NDk0MjQ= | 1221 | Support SSL/TLS directly | 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2021-02-12T00:18:29Z | 2022-12-18T02:39:04Z | 2021-02-12T00:52:18Z | OWNER | This should be pretty easy because Uvicorn supports them already. Need a good mechanism for testing it - https://pypi.org/project/trustme/ looks ideal. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1221/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1499081664 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZWivA | 1959 | Refactor test suite to use mostly `async def` tests | 9599 | closed | 0 | 9 | 2022-12-15T21:02:54Z | 2022-12-17T21:49:37Z | 2022-12-17T21:49:36Z | OWNER | I got blocked working on this issue due to weird and hard-to-debug test suite problems: - #1955 The test suite has needed a major upgrade for several years now. It has a LOT of `def test_...` synchronous functions that could be upgraded to `async def` for better performance and less test complexity - I've used the new `async def` pattern in plugins and new tests for a couple of years now. Hopefully I can get more of the tests to use in-memory named databases too, ideally so I can fix this consistent problem: - #1843 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1959/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1497909798 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZSEom | 1958 | datasette --root running in Docker doesn't reliably show the magic URL | 11729897 | closed | 0 | 11 | 2022-12-13T16:29:13Z | 2022-12-16T00:59:12Z | 2022-12-16T00:55:19Z | NONE | I followed these steps: `docker run datasetteproject/datasette pip install datasette-upload-csvs` `docker commit $(docker ps -lq) datasette-with-plugins` `docker run -p 8001:8001 -v $(pwd):/mnt datasette-with-plugins datasette --root -p 8001 -h 0.0.0.0` Visited: http://127.0.0.1:8001/-/plugins ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11729897/207392071-d939cd5e-1d96-4e11-b0be-dc06dd207866.png) Visited: http://localhost:8001/-/upload-csvs ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11729897/207389241-3e96ca66-ca74-4a16-8b7d-4427ee862c5e.png) I may have missed a step? Thank you. --- Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1958/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1495821607 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZKG0n | 1953 | Release notes for Datasette 1.0a2 | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 2 | 2022-12-14T06:26:40Z | 2022-12-15T02:02:15Z | 2022-12-15T02:01:08Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/milestone/27?closed=1 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a1...9ad76d279e2c3874ca5070626a25458ce129f126 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1953/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1473411197 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5X0nh9 | 1927 | ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 5 | 2022-12-02T20:32:30Z | 2022-12-15T01:47:01Z | 2022-12-08T01:43:01Z | OWNER | See also: - #1924 It turns out I want to be able to call `/db/-/create` multiple times with the `rows` argument, so that I don't have to worry about creating the table first. As such I find myself wanting support for the `"insert": true` and `"replace": true` options as well. Still TODO: - [x] A test for the case where you call `/-/create` twice with `rows` without using these options - [x] `pk` should be required if you are using these options - [x] Error if you pass `pk` and the table exists already but has a different `pk` - [x] Documentation for `insert` and `replace` - and what happens if you repeat a `/-/create` with rows generally - [x] Documentation should explain that you are allowed to call `/-/create` more than once using `rows`. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1483320357 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Yaawl | 1937 | /db/-/create API should require insert-rows permission to use row: or rows: option | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 2 | 2022-12-08T01:33:09Z | 2022-12-14T20:21:26Z | 2022-12-14T20:21:26Z | OWNER | Otherwise someone with `create-table` but no` insert-rows` permission could abuse it to insert data. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1937/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1497288666 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZPs_a | 1956 | Handle abbreviations properly in permission_allowed_actor_restrictions | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 2 | 2022-12-14T19:54:21Z | 2022-12-14T20:04:29Z | 2022-12-14T20:04:28Z | OWNER | This code currently assumes abbreviations are: ```pyton action_initials = "".join([word[0] for word in action.split("-")]) ``` https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1a3dcf494376e32f7cff110c86a88e5b0a3f3924/datasette/default_permissions.py#L182-L208 That's no longer correct, they are now registered by the new plugin hook: - #1939 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1956/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1493390939 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZA1Zb | 1947 | UI to create reduced scope tokens from the `/-/create-token` page | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 22 | 2022-12-13T05:10:48Z | 2022-12-14T05:22:00Z | 2022-12-14T05:13:24Z | OWNER | Split from: - #1855 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1947/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1495431932 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZInr8 | 1951 | `datasette.create_token(...)` method for creating signed API tokens | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 6 | 2022-12-14T01:25:34Z | 2022-12-14T02:43:45Z | 2022-12-14T02:42:05Z | OWNER | I need this for: - #1947 And I can refactor this to use it too: - #1855 By making this a documented internal API it can be used by other plugins too. It's also going to be really useful for writing tests. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1951/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1423336089 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1mKZ | 1855 | `datasette create-token` ability to create tokens with a reduced set of permissions | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 19 | 2022-10-26T02:20:52Z | 2022-12-14T01:24:49Z | 2022-12-13T05:20:24Z | OWNER | Initial design ideas: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1289733483 > Token design concept: > > ```json > { > "t": { > "a": ["ir", "ur", "dr"], > "d": { > "fixtures": ["ir", "ur", "dr"] > }, > "t": { > "fixtures": { > "searchable": ["ir"] > } > } > } > } > ``` > > That JSON would be minified and signed. > > Minified version of the above looks like this (101 characters): > > `{"t":{"a":["ir","ur","dr"],"d":{"fixtures":["ir","ur","dr"]},"t":{"fixtures":{"searchable":["ir"]}}}}` > > The `"t"` key shows this is a token that as a default API key. > > `"a"` means "all" - these are permissions that have been granted on all tables and databases. > > `"d"` means "databases" - this is a way to set permissions for all tables in a specific database. > > `"t"` means "tables" - this lets you set permissions at a finely grained table level. > > Then the permissions themselves are two character codes which are shortened versions - so: > > * `ir` = `insert-row` > * `ur` = `update-row` > * `dr` = `delete-row` ## Remaining tasks - [x] Add these options to the `datasette create-token` command - [x] Tests for `datasette create-token` options - [x] Documentation for those options at https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/authentication.html#datasette-create-token - [x] A way to handle permissions that don't have known abbreviations (permissions added by plugins). Probably need to solve the plugin permission registration problem as part of that - [x] Stop hard-coding names of actions in the `permission_allowed_actor_restrictions` function | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1855/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1495241162 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZH5HK | 1950 | Bad ?_sort returns a 500 error, should be a 400 | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-12-13T22:08:16Z | 2022-12-13T22:23:22Z | 2022-12-13T22:23:22Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_sort=bad <img width="453" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/207454481-2ba2e2bd-7400-47a6-b8a1-f898a2d364d8.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1950/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1493339206 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAoxG | 1946 | `datasette --get` mechanism for sending tokens | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 2 | 2022-12-13T04:25:05Z | 2022-12-13T04:36:57Z | 2022-12-13T04:36:57Z | OWNER | > For the tests for `datasette create-token` it would be useful if `datasette --get` had a mechanism for sending an `Authorization: Bearer X` header. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855#issuecomment-1347731288_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1946/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1493306655 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAg0f | 1945 | `view-instance` should not be checked for /-/actor.json | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 0 | 2022-12-13T04:01:46Z | 2022-12-13T04:11:56Z | 2022-12-13T04:11:56Z | OWNER | Spotted this while testing: - #1855 ``` export TOKEN=$(datasette create-token root --secret s -a foo) curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" http://localhost:8002/-/actor.json ``` Returned a Forbidden error (and not in JSON either). | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1945/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1138008042 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5D1J_q | 1636 | "permissions" propery in metadata for configuring arbitrary permissions | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 14 | 2022-02-15T00:25:59Z | 2022-12-13T02:40:50Z | 2022-12-13T02:40:50Z | OWNER | The `"allow"` block mechanism can already be used to configure various default permissions. When adding permissions to `datasette-tiddlywiki` I realized it would be good to be able to configure arbitrary permissions such as `edit-tiddlywiki` there too. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1485757511 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5YjtxH | 1939 | register_permissions(datasette) plugin hook | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 20 | 2022-12-09T01:33:25Z | 2022-12-13T02:07:50Z | 2022-12-13T02:05:56Z | OWNER | A plugin hook that adds more named permissions to the list which is initially populated here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e539c1c024bc62d88df91d9107cbe37e7f0fe55f/datasette/permissions.py#L1-L19 Originally imagined this hook in this comment: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1881#issuecomment-1301639370 I need this for a few reasons: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636 - Needs it in order to validate that permissions defined in `metadata.json` are set in the right place (don't set an instance permissions at table level for example) - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855 - Needs it to be able to register additional abbreviations for use in signed cookies - And for validation when you use `datasette create-token` and pass in extra permissions - The https://latest.datasette.io/-/permissions debug interface needs it to add extra debug options to the `<select>` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1939/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1434094365 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Veosd | 1881 | Tool for simulating permission checks against actors | 9599 | closed | 0 | 9 | 2022-11-03T04:43:20Z | 2022-12-09T01:38:21Z | 2022-11-04T00:13:05Z | OWNER | In working on this issue: - #1855 I realized that if I'm going to make actors more complicated (the proposed `_r` key for additional restricted permissions) I really need an interactive tool for simulating these checks, similar to the https://latest.datasette.io/-/allow-debug tool. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1881/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1432013704 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWsuI | 1878 | /db/table/-/upsert API | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8711695 | 8 | 2022-11-01T20:01:18Z | 2022-12-08T01:12:18Z | 2022-12-08T01:12:17Z | OWNER | Equivalent to `sqlite-utils upsert`: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/python-api.html#upserting-data | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1878/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1473659191 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5X1kE3 | 1929 | Incorrect link from the API explorer to the JSON API documentation | 3556 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-12-03T02:08:58Z | 2022-12-06T19:36:23Z | 2022-12-06T19:34:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I installed `datasette==1.0a1`. When I go to http://127.0.0.1:8001/-/api I have a link: `Use this tool to try out the [Datasette API](https://docs.datasette.io/en/1.0a1/json_api.html).` but that documentation page does not exist. I'm not sure where it has to be fixed, should it link to the stable page https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/json_api.html , the latest one https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/json_api.html#the-json-write-api or would it be more appropriated to deploy documentation for the `1.0a1` version? | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1929/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1473481262 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5X04ou | 1928 | Hacker News Datasette write demo | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7 | 2022-12-02T21:17:41Z | 2022-12-02T23:47:11Z | 2022-12-02T21:43:19Z | OWNER | Idea is to have my existing scraper at https://github.com/simonw/scrape-hacker-news-by-domain also write to my private Datasette Cloud account, then create an atom feed from it. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1928/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1471969984 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5XvHrA | 1926 | Release notes for 1.0a1 (and release it) | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7867486 | 1 | 2022-12-01T21:18:12Z | 2022-12-01T22:06:13Z | 2022-12-01T22:06:12Z | OWNER | Mainly CORS support and a few small bug fixes. Changes: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/compare/1.0a0...99da46f7258225fc6fd8e94ddc20859ccccc4109 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1926/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1214859703 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IaUm3 | 1719 | Refactor `RowView` and remove `RowTableShared` | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-04-25T18:06:24Z | 2022-12-01T21:15:19Z | 2022-04-25T18:33:44Z | OWNER | > The `RowTableShared` class is making this a whole lot more complicated. > > I'm going to split the `RowView` view out into an entirely separate `views/row.py` module. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1715#issuecomment-1108875068_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1719/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1215174094 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IbhXO | 1720 | Design plugin hook for extras | 9599 | closed | 0 | 14 | 2022-04-26T00:08:10Z | 2022-12-01T21:15:19Z | 2022-04-26T20:20:27Z | OWNER | Refs: - #262 - #1709 I realized that this is a really natural plugin hook - and if I design it as a hook I can implement Datasette's core extras as default plugins. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1720/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1212823665 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ISjhx | 1715 | Refactor TableView to use asyncinject | 9599 | closed | 0 | 13 | 2022-04-22T21:43:39Z | 2022-12-01T21:15:18Z | 2022-04-28T22:26:56Z | OWNER | I've been working on a dependency injection mechanism in a separate library: - https://github.com/simonw/asyncinject I think it's ready to try out with Datasette to see if it's a pattern that will work here. I'm going to attempt to refactor `TableView` to use it. There are two overall goals here: - Use `asyncinject` to add parallel execution of some aspects of the table page - most notably I want to be able to execute the `count(*)` query, the `select ...` query, the various faceting queries and the facet suggestion queries in parallel - and measure if doing so is good for performance. - Use it to execute different output formats (possibly with some changes to the existing `register_output_renderer()` plugin hook). I want CSV and JSON to use the same mechanism that plugins use. Stretch goal is to get this working with streaming data too, see: - #1101 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1715/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1469973742 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5XngTu | 1922 | Make sure CORS works for write APIs | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7867486 | 13 | 2022-11-30T17:15:55Z | 2022-12-01T18:47:00Z | 2022-12-01T18:47:00Z | OWNER | Split from: - #1850 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1922/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1470509936 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5XpjNw | 1924 | Docs for replace:true and ignore:true options for insert API | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7867486 | 4 | 2022-12-01T01:33:25Z | 2022-12-01T18:15:15Z | 2022-12-01T02:08:02Z | OWNER | Equivalent to https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#insert-replacing-data | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1924/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1470320227 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xo05j | 1923 | latest.datasette.io Cloud Run deploys failing | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-11-30T22:49:34Z | 2022-11-30T23:04:56Z | 2022-11-30T23:04:56Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3587402085/jobs/6038106719v ``` Warning: "service_account_key" has been deprecated. Please switch to using google-github-actions/auth which supports both Workload Identity Federation and Service Account Key JSON authentication. For more details, see https://github.com/google-github-actions/setup-gcloud#authorization Error: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud failed with: failed to execute command `gcloud --quiet auth activate-service-account *** --key-file -`: /opt/hostedtoolcache/gcloud/275.0.0/x64/lib/googlecloudsdk/core/console/console_io.py:544: SyntaxWarning: "is" with a literal. Did you mean "=="? if answer is None or (answer is '' and default is not None): ERROR: gcloud failed to load: module 'collections' has no attribute 'MutableMapping' ``` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1923/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1469044738 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9gC | 1918 | API explorer should list mutable databases first | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7867486 | 1 | 2022-11-30T04:53:33Z | 2022-11-30T05:22:07Z | 2022-11-30T05:07:56Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/-/api hides `ephemeral` down at the bottom, would be more interesting if it was at the top. Related: - #1915 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1918/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1469015001 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj2PZ | 1916 | GET requests against POST endpoints should not 500 error | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7867486 | 1 | 2022-11-30T04:04:43Z | 2022-11-30T05:15:19Z | 2022-11-30T05:15:19Z | OWNER | ![CF37BA4D-0677-4DDD-A339-EAF163BB63B7](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/204705025-6f88e9f7-757d-45e8-a89c-ab97e84781e8.png) | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1916/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1469043836 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xj9R8 | 1917 | Don't allow writable API to edit the `_memory` database | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7867486 | 2 | 2022-11-30T04:51:59Z | 2022-11-30T05:07:56Z | 2022-11-30T05:07:55Z | OWNER | It shows up on https://latest.datasette.io/-/api (once you are signed in as root) - but there's no point in creating tables in it because they likely won't persist from one request to the next, as it's not a shared named database. <img width="1122" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/204710529-bfab8442-d89b-4928-9b9a-e39bc53c1673.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1917/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1468709531 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xirqb | 1915 | Interactive demo of Datasette 1.0 write APIs | 9599 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2022-11-29T21:16:03Z | 2022-11-30T04:05:46Z | 2022-11-30T04:05:46Z | OWNER | I'm going to try to get this working on https://latest.datasette.io/ - it already has a way for people to sign in as root, but none of the databases there are writable. So I'm going to build a plugin which adds a writable named in-memory database. And some kind of mechanism for clearing out that database on a regular basis - maybe tables in that database get deleted automatically an hour after they are created? (Would be neat to display their time-left-until-deleted too) | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1915/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1421529723 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UutJ7 | 1850 | Write API in Datasette core | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 13 | 2022-10-24T22:13:24Z | 2022-11-29T20:11:20Z | 2022-11-29T20:11:20Z | OWNER | I need this for Datasette Cloud, and in thinking it through I realized that it's really time Datasette grew a default write API as well. I'm going to mostly model this off `sqlite-utils`, since I've spent a bunch of time iterating on a pseudo-JSON API for that over the past few years (piping JSON to stdin etc). I want this for Datasette 1.0. I'm going to be building it in the new [1.0-dev](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/tree/1.0-dev) branch, which is automatically deployed to https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/ running on Cloud Run. API features to build: - [x] #1852 - [x] #1856 - [x] #1857 - [x] #1858 - [x] #1859 - [x] #1871 - [x] #1888 - [x] #1868 - [x] #1851 - [x] #1863 - [x] #1864 - [x] #1866 - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882 - [x] #1862 - [x] #1874 - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1887 - [x] #1877 Bumped to later on: - #1855 - #1878 - #1873 - #1875 - Make sure CORS works - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1889 - Alter a table - `sqlite-utils transform` style (more powerful than straight ALTER) - Execute SQL against a write connection - Maybe even multiple write SQL statements bundled in a single transaction - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1867 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1850/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1468603401 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5XiRwJ | 1913 | Release Datasette 1.0a0 | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 9 | 2022-11-29T19:41:42Z | 2022-11-29T20:10:35Z | 2022-11-29T20:10:35Z | OWNER | I attempted the release just now - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/1.0a0 - and got an unexpected test failure: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3577355358/attempts/1 ``` > assert delete_response.status_code == 200 E assert 404 == 200 E + where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code /home/runner/work/datasette/datasette/tests/test_api_write.py:396: AssertionError =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED tests/test_api_write.py::test_delete_row[compound_pk_table-row_for_create2-pks2-article,k] - assert 404 == 200 + where 404 = <Response [404 Not Found]>.status_code ``` I hit "retry" on that test but I expect it to fail again. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1913/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1432012302 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VWsYO | 1877 | Refactor and tidy up final write API code | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2022-11-01T20:00:11Z | 2022-11-29T19:44:16Z | 2022-11-29T19:44:07Z | OWNER | - `views/table.py` has got a bit too big - I think the write classes should be pulled out into a separate module. - [x] There's duplicate logic for deciding if the table and database exist and checking permissions | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1877/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1450312343 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WcgKX | 1892 | Merge 1.0-dev branch back to main | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 3 | 2022-11-15T20:04:25Z | 2022-11-29T19:40:23Z | 2022-11-29T19:40:23Z | OWNER | I'm committed enough to the 1.0 work now that I'm ready for the `main` branch to reflect that instead. If I need to make any dot-releases against 0.63 I can do those from a branch. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1892/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1450303205 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wcd7l | 1891 | 1.0a0 release notes | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 4 | 2022-11-15T19:58:20Z | 2022-11-29T19:23:41Z | 2022-11-29T19:23:41Z | OWNER | This release will mainly help preview the new Datasette write API: - #1850 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1891/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1425029275 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dib | 1864 | Delete a single record from an existing table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 4 | 2022-10-27T04:53:22Z | 2022-11-29T18:54:04Z | 2022-11-29T18:54:04Z | OWNER | API design: ``` POST /db/table/row-pks/-/delete Or... DELETE /db/table/row-pks/-/delete ``` I'm just going to do `POST` for the moment, like I did here: - #1874 Permission: `delete-row` Still needed: - [ ] Tests for rowid tables - [ ] Tests for compound primary keys | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1864/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1468519699 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh9UT | 1911 | `/db/-/create` should support creating tables with compound primary keys | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 2 | 2022-11-29T18:30:47Z | 2022-11-29T18:50:58Z | 2022-11-29T18:48:05Z | OWNER | Found myself needing this to write the tests for: - #1864 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1911/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1425029242 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U8Dh6 | 1863 | Update a single record in an existing table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 16 | 2022-10-27T04:53:17Z | 2022-11-29T18:08:53Z | 2022-11-29T18:06:37Z | OWNER | API design: ``` POST /db/table/row-pks/-/update { "field": "updated_value" } ``` Only the fields that you pass will be updated. Maybe this is the wrong design though? The design for insert currently looks like this: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1294224185 ``` POST /db/table/-/insert Authorization: Bearer xxx Content-Type: application/json { "row": { "id": 1, "name": "New name" } } ``` I could use the same format for `/-/update`, but in this case the API doesn't require you to pass every field so `"row"` doesn't seem like the right key. I think I'll go with this: ``` POST /db/table/1/-/update Authorization: Bearer xxx Content-Type: application/json { "update": { "name": "New name" } } ``` The benefit of having an `"update"` key is that it allows me to use other keys in the future. Maybe a `"alter": true` key to indicate that new columns should be added if they are missing. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1863/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1456012874 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyP5K | 1905 | `publish heroku` failing due to old Python version | 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-11-19T00:01:45Z | 2022-11-19T01:12:05Z | 2022-11-19T00:52:29Z | OWNER | Reported on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/823971286941302908/1042814317118115901 ``` -----> Building on the Heroku-22 stack -----> Determining which buildpack to use for this app -----> Python app detected -----> Using Python version specified in runtime.txt ! Requested runtime 'python-3.8.10' is not available for this stack (heroku-22). ! For supported versions, see: https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-support ! Push rejected, failed to compile Python app. ! Push failed ▸ Build failed ``` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1905/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1455932972 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx8Ys | 1904 | Datasette Lite tests failing due to httpx upgrade | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 0 | 2022-11-18T22:49:31Z | 2022-11-18T22:57:48Z | 2022-11-18T22:52:22Z | OWNER | Same problem as this one: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-lite/issues/56 Caused this failure: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3500765964 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1904/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1452364777 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WkVPp | 1896 | Extract logic for resolving a URL to a database / table / row | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 4 | 2022-11-16T22:25:20Z | 2022-11-18T22:57:47Z | 2022-11-18T22:56:55Z | OWNER | > In trying to write this I realize that there's a lot of duplicated code with delete row, specifically around resolving the incoming URL into a row (or a database or a table). > > Since this is so common, I think it's worth extracting the logic out first. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1317755263_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1896/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1450796965 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WeWel | 1894 | Initialize CodeMirror during DOMContentLoaded instead of onload | 95570 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2022-11-16T03:52:19Z | 2022-11-18T07:29:02Z | 2022-11-18T07:29:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | As per https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893/files#r1023248927 this should prevent a flash between the textarea being replaced by CodeMirror. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1894/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1452495049 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wk1DJ | 1899 | Clicking within the CodeMirror area below the SQL (i.e. when there's only a single line) doesn't cause the editor to get focused | 95570 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-11-17T00:29:52Z | 2022-11-18T07:28:28Z | 2022-11-18T07:20:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | After the upgrade to 6 (#1893) I noticed this. I think it's because we're doing overflow:hidden to accomplish the CSS resizer. When there's a single line of SQL there's a gap below that line where clicking doesn't do anything. It should focus at the end of the line. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1899/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1453813400 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wp26Y | 1901 | Some plugins show "home" breadcrumbs twice in the top left | 95570 | closed | 0 | 8 | 2022-11-17T18:44:58Z | 2022-11-18T07:22:37Z | 2022-11-18T07:02:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | <img width="1023" alt="Screenshot 2022-11-17 at 10 44 12 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/95570/202531505-b8632f70-d95a-425f-b2f2-6380b153478b.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1901/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1452457263 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wkr0v | 1897 | Serve schema JSON to the SQL editor to enable autocomplete | 9599 | closed | 0 | 9 | 2022-11-16T23:47:45Z | 2022-11-18T05:33:20Z | 2022-11-18T02:54:43Z | OWNER | See: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1893#issuecomment-1317831555 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1897/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1448143294 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WUOm- | 1890 | Autocomplete text entry for filter values that correspond to facets | 536941 | closed | 0 | 16 | 2022-11-14T14:11:31Z | 2022-11-17T00:47:36Z | 2022-11-16T03:23:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | datasette allows users to enter in the value for named parameters into a free-text form field. I think it would add a lot of usability, if the form field could be a drop down of options when query value is already a faceted column. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1890/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1447388809 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRWaJ | 1887 | Add a confirm step to the drop table API | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 2 | 2022-11-14T04:59:53Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:59Z | 2022-11-14T05:18:51Z | OWNER | > In playing with the API explorer just now I realized it's way too easy to accidentally drop a table using it. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1871#issuecomment-1313097057_ Added drop table API in: - #1874 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1887/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1429030341 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VLUXF | 1874 | API to drop a table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 4 | 2022-10-30T21:55:11Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:53Z | 2022-11-14T05:45:06Z | OWNER | `POST /db/table/-/drop` Require `drop-table` permission. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1874/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1425011030 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U7_FW | 1862 | Create a new table from one or more records, `sqlite-utils` style | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 5 | 2022-10-27T04:25:02Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:47Z | 2022-11-15T06:42:09Z | OWNER | It's interesting to also think about what the form-based UI for this could look like - since that would involve users creating new columns of different types on the fly. Will need the `create-table` permission. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1862/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1435294468 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VjNsE | 1882 | `/db/-/create` API for creating tables | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 12 | 2022-11-03T21:44:32Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:43Z | 2022-11-15T06:00:41Z | OWNER | > It really feels like this should be accompanied by a `/db/-/create` API for creating tables. I had to add that to `sqlite-utils` eventually (initially it only supported creating by passing in an example document): > > https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#cli-create-table _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1862#issuecomment-1299073433_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1426001541 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U_w6F | 1866 | API for bulk inserting records into a table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 12 | 2022-10-27T17:19:25Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:34Z | 2022-10-30T06:04:07Z | OWNER | Similar to https://github.com/simonw/datasette-insert/blob/0.8/README.md#inserting-data-and-creating-tables I expect this to become by far the most common way that data gets into a Datasette instance - more so than the individual row API in: - #1851 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1866/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1421544654 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UuwzO | 1851 | API to insert a single record into an existing table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 22 | 2022-10-24T22:24:21Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:18Z | 2022-10-28T00:59:25Z | OWNER | Controlled by a new `insert-row` permission. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1426195437 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAgPt | 1868 | Design URLs for the write API | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 5 | 2022-10-27T19:55:30Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:14Z | 2022-10-27T20:07:01Z | OWNER | My original design for this issue: - #1851 Was `POST /db/table` with JSON of `{"insert": {...}}`. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1868/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1447439985 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRi5x | 1888 | API explorer should take immutability into account | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 1 | 2022-11-14T06:00:14Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:10Z | 2022-11-14T06:04:48Z | OWNER | Refs: - #1871 I noticed the API explorer doesn't show any links on https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/-/api because the `fixtures` database is immutable. It should still show read examples there. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1888/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1427293909 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VEsbV | 1871 | API explorer tool | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 24 | 2022-10-28T13:49:11Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:05Z | 2022-11-14T04:59:59Z | OWNER | The API will be much easier to develop if there's a page that helps you execute JSON POSTs against it. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1871/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1423369494 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1uUW | 1859 | datasette create-token CLI command | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 3 | 2022-10-26T03:12:59Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:00Z | 2022-10-26T04:31:39Z | OWNER | The CLI equivalent of the `/-/create-token` page. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1859/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1423364990 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1tN- | 1858 | `max_signed_tokens_ttl` setting for a maximum duration on API tokens | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 4 | 2022-10-26T03:05:53Z | 2022-11-15T19:58:52Z | 2022-10-27T03:15:05Z | OWNER | It's currently possible to use `/-/create-token` to create a token that lasts forever. Some administrators may wish to have a maximum expiry instead. I should support that with a setting. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1858/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1423347412 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1o7U | 1857 | Prevent API tokens from using /-/create-token to create more tokens | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 1 | 2022-10-26T02:38:09Z | 2022-11-15T19:57:11Z | 2022-10-26T02:57:26Z | OWNER | > It strikes me that users should NOT be able to use a token to create additional tokens. > > The current design actually does allow that, since the `dstok_` Bearer token can be used to authenticate calls to the `/-/create-token` page. > > So I think I need a mechanism whereby that page can only allow access to users authenticated by cookie. > > Not obvious how to do that though, since Datasette's authentication actor system is designed to abstract that detail away! _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1291417100_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1857/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1423336122 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U1mK6 | 1856 | allow_signed_tokens setting for disabling API signed token mechanism | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 3 | 2022-10-26T02:20:55Z | 2022-11-15T19:57:05Z | 2022-10-26T02:58:35Z | OWNER | Had some design thoughts here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1852#issuecomment-1291272280 I liked this option the most: --setting allow_create_tokens off | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1856/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1421552095 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Uuynf | 1852 | Default API token authentication mechanism | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 30 | 2022-10-24T22:31:07Z | 2022-11-15T19:57:00Z | 2022-10-26T02:19:54Z | OWNER | API authentication will be via `Authorization: Bearer XXX` request headers. I'm inclined to add a default token mechanism to Datasette based on tokens that are signed with the `DATASETTE_SECRET`. Maybe the root user can access `/-/create-token` which provides a UI for generating a time-limited signed token? Could also have a `datasette token` command for creating such tokens at the command-line. Plugins can then define alternative ways of creating tokens, such as the existing https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-auth-tokens plugin. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1289706439_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1435917503 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Vlly_ | 1883 | Errors when using table filters behind a proxy | 31312775 | closed | 0 | 13 | 2022-11-04T11:18:47Z | 2022-11-11T09:20:22Z | 2022-11-11T06:54:58Z | NONE | Using datasette==0.63 table filters do not respect the `base_url` setting as described [here](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/deploying.html#running-datasette-behind-a-proxy) To reproduce, go to: https://datasette-apache-proxy-demo.datasette.io/prefix/fixtures/binary_data Then use the table filter buttons. The `/prefix/` is dropped, resulting in URL not found: https://datasette-apache-proxy-demo.datasette.io/fixtures/binary_data?_sort=rowid&rowid__exact=1 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1 } |
completed | ||||||
1431786951 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VV1XH | 1876 | SQL query should wrap on SQL interrupted screen | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-11-01T17:14:01Z | 2022-11-01T17:22:33Z | 2022-11-01T17:22:33Z | OWNER | Just saw this: <img width="1197" alt="CleanShot 2022-11-01 at 10 12 16@2x" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/199294909-df6fcb3b-40d0-4444-8a92-a7a358a28d86.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1876/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1428560020 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJhiU | 1872 | SITE-BUSTING ERROR: "render_template() called before await ds.invoke_startup()" | 192568 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-10-30T02:28:39Z | 2022-10-30T06:26:01Z | 2022-10-30T06:26:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 1. My https://list.saferdisinfectants.org/disinfectants/listN page (linked from https://SaferDisinfectants.org ) has been running beautifully for a year and a half, including a GitHub Actions workflow that's been routinely updating the database. 2. I received a recent report that the list page is down. I don't know when it went down, but the content is replaced with: "render_template() called before await ds.invoke_startup()" 3. The local datasette repo runs without incident. 4. The site is hosted on vercel, linked to my github repo. Perhaps some vercel changes were made, but not by anyone on our side. Here is a screenshot of the current project settings: <img width="877" alt="Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 9 23 30 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/192568/198859474-341a5504-88b8-452d-bd06-e988cbe75e6c.png"> Here a screenshot of the latest deployment status: <img width="1351" alt="Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 10 19 21 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/192568/198859641-ad3d99ba-a41d-4b98-88f6-e3a01fe9f238.png"> This is my repository: https://github.com/mroswell/list-N (I notice: datasette==0.59 in my requirements.txt file) Because it's been long while since I actively worked on this or any other datasette project, I forget a lot of what I knew at one point. Perhaps some configuration file could be missing? Or perhaps I just need to know the right incantation to add to that vercel settings page. Help is welcome as the nonprofit org is soon hosting its annual conference, and we'd love to have the page working again. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1872/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1426253476 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAuak | 1869 | Release 0.63 | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-10-27T20:53:01Z | 2022-10-27T22:24:38Z | 2022-10-27T22:11:33Z | OWNER | Most of the release notes are already written: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.63a0 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/releases/tag/0.63a1 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1869/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1342430983 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5QA98H | 1786 | Adjust height of textarea for no JS case | 9599 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-08-18T01:15:15Z | 2022-10-27T21:50:12Z | 2022-08-18T16:06:09Z | OWNER | Datasette Lite: https://lite.datasette.io/?sql=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/simonw/1f8a91123ccefd8844187225b1832d7a/raw/5069075b86aa79358fbab3d4482d1d269077d632/recipes.sql#/data?sql=select+id%2C+name%2C+ingredients%2C+%28%0A++select+json_group_array%28value%29+from+json_each%28ingredients%29%0A++where+value+in+%28select+value+from+json_each%28%3Ap0%29%29%0A%29+as+matching_ingredients%0Afrom+recipes%0Awhere+json_array_length%28matching_ingredients%29+%3E+0%0Aorder+by+json_array_length%28matching_ingredients%29+desc&p0=%5B%22sugar%22%2C+%22cheese%22%5D ![46F8101E-8CE3-4F61-B200-F865E6B5DBCC](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/185270723-f55513b0-b561-434d-9d7c-4fe5be9756e0.jpeg) | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1786/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1424378012 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U5kic | 1860 | SQL query field can't begin by a comment | 562352 | closed | 0 | 12 | 2022-10-26T16:55:31Z | 2022-10-27T18:57:37Z | 2022-10-27T04:21:40Z | NONE | ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/562352/198085197-f26fcd61-4dac-4ca4-a346-e70f88a30ecc.png) SQL comments are **very** useful to explain the meaning of the query. It's currently impossible to put it at the beginning of the field as seen on the screen capture: it leads to an error: `Statement must be a SELECT`. It would be great to make it possible because: * as the request is the title of the page: * it eases the search with search engines * it eases the search in the browsers' url field * it acts as a kind of title: the global meaning of the query is immediately understandable * some tools, such as Slack, are shortening long URLs and displaying the beginning of the URLs (eg. `https://example.org/products?sql=select+%28length%28data_quality_errors_ta[...]+%21%3D+%22%22+group+by+NB_of_issues+order+by+NB_of_issues+desc+limit+200`) Beginning a query with a comment is possible with SQLite. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1860/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1425682079 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U-i6f | 1865 | Stop syncing main to master | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2022-10-27T13:55:38Z | 2022-10-27T13:58:27Z | 2022-10-27T13:56:13Z | OWNER | I think it's been long enough now that I can drop the code that syncs the main branch to master. I originally added this for people who might be using `datasette publish ... --branch master` - which might only have been me anyway! | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1865/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
639072811 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzkwNzI4MTE= | 849 | Rename master branch to main | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3268330 | 10 | 2020-06-15T19:05:54Z | 2022-10-27T13:57:08Z | 2020-09-15T20:37:14Z | OWNER | I was waiting for consensus to form around this (and kind-of hoping for `trunk` since I like the tree metaphor) and it looks like `main` is it. I've seen convincing arguments against `trunk` too - it indicates that the branch has some special significance like in Subversion (where all branches come from trunk) when it doesn't. So `main` is better anyway. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/849/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1420174670 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UpiVO | 1849 | NoneType' object has no attribute 'actor' | 9599 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2022-10-24T04:02:15Z | 2022-10-26T21:13:40Z | 2022-10-26T21:13:40Z | OWNER | ``` File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/datasette/templates/_crumbs.html", line 3, in template {% set items=crumb_items(request=request, database=database, table=table) %} File "jinja2/async_utils.py", line 65, in auto_await return await t.cast("t.Awaitable[V]", value) File "datasette/app.py", line 638, in _crumb_items actor=request.actor, action="view-instance", default=True ``` From Sentry. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1849/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
642297505 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDIyOTc1MDU= | 857 | Comprehensive documentation for variables made available to templates | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3268330 | 1 | 2020-06-20T03:19:43Z | 2022-10-26T02:58:17Z | 2022-10-26T02:58:17Z | OWNER | Needed for the Datasette 1.0 release, so template authors can trust that Datasette is unlikely to break their templates. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/857/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1422973111 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5U0Ni3 | 1854 | Flaky test: test_serve_localhost_http | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-10-25T19:37:35Z | 2022-10-25T19:53:02Z | 2022-10-25T19:53:02Z | OWNER | Failing on Python 3.10 at the moment: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/actions/runs/3323629947/jobs/5494340302 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1854/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1422915587 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Uz_gD | 1853 | Upgrade Datasette Docker to Python 3.11 | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7 | 2022-10-25T18:44:31Z | 2022-10-25T19:28:56Z | 2022-10-25T19:05:16Z | OWNER | Related: - #1768 I think this base image looks right: [3.11.0-slim-bullseye](https://hub.docker.com/layers/library/python/3.11.0-slim-bullseye/images/sha256-244c0b0e6e7608a16f87382fc8a5ef3c330d042113a9a7b6fc15a95360181651?context=explore) | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1853/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1420090659 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UpN0j | 1848 | Private database page should show padlock on every table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-10-24T02:28:38Z | 2022-10-24T02:50:29Z | 2022-10-24T02:42:34Z | OWNER | Following: - #1829 https://latest.datasette.io/_internal looks like this: <img width="741" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/197436797-815ab54f-33d9-4f49-981f-628ce4e9013c.png"> But those queries and tables are private too, and should also show the padlock icon. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1848/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1396948693 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5TQ77V | 1829 | Table/database that is private due to inherited permissions does not show padlock | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8 | 2022-10-04T23:14:16Z | 2022-10-24T02:23:46Z | 2022-10-24T02:11:37Z | OWNER | I noticed that a table page that is private because the database or instance is private, e.g. this one: <img width="982" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/193947303-ed643dcd-a07c-4ffb-ab22-539c4c803206.png"> Is not displaying the padlock icon that indicates the table is not visible to the public. <img width="969" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/193947373-ddbdf398-ea67-4e21-b54d-60c48496701d.png"> Same issue for the database page too, which in this case is private due to `view-instance`. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1829/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1420055377 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UpFNR | 1847 | Both _local_metadata and _metadata_local? | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2022-10-24T01:43:08Z | 2022-10-24T01:53:13Z | 2022-10-24T01:53:13Z | OWNER | Spotted this in the debugger against the `datasette` object while running tests (`pytest -k test_permissions_cascade` to be exact): ``` (Pdb) [p for p in dir(self) if p.startswith('_') and '__' not in p] ['_actor', '_asset_urls', '_connected_databases', '_crumb_items', '_local_metadata', '_metadata', '_metadata_local', '_metadata_recursive_update', '_permission_checks', '_plugins', '_prepare_connection', '_refresh_schemas', '_refresh_schemas_lock', '_register_custom_units', '_register_renderers', '_root_token', '_routes', '_secret', '_settings', '_show_messages', '_startup_hook_calculation', '_startup_hook_fired', '_startup_invoked', '_threads', '_versions', '_write_messages_to_response'] ``` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1847/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1409679008 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UBf6g | 1844 | Update screenshots in documentation to match latest designs | 9599 | closed | 0 | 18 | 2022-10-14T18:01:18Z | 2022-10-14T23:51:46Z | 2022-10-14T19:57:17Z | OWNER | https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.62/full_text_search.html has this out-of-date screenshot: <img width="1191" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/195911747-386f4cd2-5239-4c83-8e0c-072e6ae56ff6.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1844/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1397084281 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5TRdB5 | 1831 | If user can see table but NOT database/instance nav links should not display | 9599 | closed | 0 | 10 | 2022-10-05T02:16:31Z | 2022-10-13T21:52:04Z | 2022-10-13T21:52:04Z | OWNER | Spotted this bug while building this plugin: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-public This is a public table, but the two links in the nav go to forbidden pages: <img width="1007" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/193964983-c574efcd-fd7d-4507-bb71-58fe5252a831.png"> Those nav links shouldn't be shown at all. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1831/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1157182254 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5E-TMu | 1646 | Configuration directory mode does not pick up other file extensions than .db | 15640196 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2022-03-02T13:15:23Z | 2022-10-07T23:06:17Z | 2022-10-07T23:03:35Z | NONE | Hello, I've been trying to run Datasette with the [configuration directory mode](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/settings.html#configuration-directory-mode) with a structure such as this one: ```plain some-directory/ example.sqlite3 another-example.db one-more.custom [...] ``` (In my scenario I can't just change the filename extension without other problems arising) Now databases with the `.sqlite3` or the custom filename extension are ignored by Datasette in this case. I'm aware that the docs state that a `.db` extension is required, but I was wondering if there is a reason for restricting this or any workaround available? When I run `datasette example.sqlite3` or `datasette one-more.custom` the databases are served by Datasette without a problem. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1646/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1400083043 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Tc5Jj | 1834 | inspect data is not used for caching database hash | 536941 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2022-10-06T17:52:01Z | 2022-10-06T20:06:21Z | 2022-10-06T20:06:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | When databases are loaded, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cb1e093fd361b758120aefc1a444df02462389a3/datasette/app.py#L257-L260 there is nothing preventing the rehashing of the database for immutable databases. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cb1e093fd361b758120aefc1a444df02462389a3/datasette/database.py#L50-L53 what i might expect is that relevant values of `inspect_data` get passed to the `Database` class to prevent re-hashing? With data that is many gigs large, this is a significant start up time. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1834/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |