github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1160182768 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5FJvvw | 412 | Optional Pandas integration | 9599 | open | 0 | 13 | 2022-03-05T01:49:27Z | 2022-06-14T15:36:29Z | OWNER | It would be neat if there was a way to use this more seamlessly with Pandas, in particular Pandas dataframes - but without making Pandas a required dependency. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/412/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1348169997 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5QW3EN | 467 | Mechanism for ensuring a table has all the columns | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8355157 | 13 | 2022-08-23T15:50:23Z | 2022-08-27T23:19:41Z | 2022-08-27T23:17:56Z | OWNER | Suggested by @jefftriplett on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/997738192360964156/1011655389063958600 | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/467/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
705975133 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDkwNjA3OTQ5 | 161 | table.transform() method | 9599 | closed | 0 | 5897911 | 13 | 2020-09-21T23:16:59Z | 2020-09-22T07:48:24Z | 2020-09-22T04:20:02Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/161 | Refs #114 - [x] Ability to change the primary key - [x] Support for changing default value for columns - [x] Support for changing `NOT NULL` status of columns - [x] Support for copying existing foreign keys and removing them - <strike>Support for `conversions=` parameter</strike> - [x] Detailed documentation - [x] `PRAGMA foreign_keys` stuff | 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/161/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||
817989436 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTc5ODk0MzY= | 242 | Async support | 25778 | open | 0 | 13 | 2021-02-27T18:29:38Z | 2021-10-28T14:37:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Following our conversation last week, want to note this here before I forget. I've had a couple situations where I'd like to do a bunch of updates in an async event loop, but I run into SQLite's issues with concurrent writes. This feels like something sqlite-utils could help with. PeeWee ORM has a [SQLite write queue](http://docs.peewee-orm.com/en/latest/peewee/playhouse.html#sqliteq) that might be a good model. It's using threads or gevent, but I _think_ that approach would translate well enough to asyncio. Happy to help with this, too. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/242/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1855838223 | PR_kwDOCGYnMM5YM-I3 | 584 | .transform() instead of modifying sqlite_master for add_foreign_keys | 9599 | closed | 0 | 13 | 2023-08-17T23:32:45Z | 2023-08-18T00:48:13Z | 2023-08-18T00:48:08Z | OWNER | simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/584 | Refs: - #577 <!-- readthedocs-preview sqlite-utils start --> ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://sqlite-utils--584.org.readthedocs.build/en/584/ <!-- readthedocs-preview sqlite-utils end --> | 140912432 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/584/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 |