github
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/485#issuecomment-497116074 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/485 | 497116074 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NzExNjA3NA== | 9599 | 2019-05-29T21:29:16Z | 2019-05-29T21:29:16Z | OWNER | Another good rule of thumb: look for text fields with a unique constraint? | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
447469253 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/492#issuecomment-496970219 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/492 | 496970219 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njk3MDIxOQ== | 9599 | 2019-05-29T14:50:10Z | 2019-05-29T14:50:10Z | OWNER | Code in question: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/2a4b892d6c0f6609ea48df0dc393397af2b7b1c1/datasette/templates/table.html#L84-L86 | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
449854604 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/120#issuecomment-496966227 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/120 | 496966227 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njk2NjIyNw== | 26342344 | 2019-05-29T14:40:52Z | 2019-05-29T14:40:52Z | NONE | I would really like this. If you give me some pointers @simonw I'm willing to PR! | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
275087397 | |
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16#issuecomment-496787958 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16 | 496787958 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njc4Nzk1OA== | 9599 | 2019-05-29T05:17:58Z | 2019-05-29T05:17:58Z | OWNER | Shipped this feature in sqlite-utils 1.1: https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html#v1-1 | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
413867537 | |
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/21#issuecomment-496786354 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/21 | 496786354 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njc4NjM1NA== | 9599 | 2019-05-29T05:09:01Z | 2019-05-29T05:09:01Z | OWNER | Shipped this feature in sqlite-utils 1.1: https://sqlite-utils.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changelog.html#v1-1 | { "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
448391492 | |
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16#issuecomment-496757010 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16 | 496757010 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njc1NzAxMA== | 9599 | 2019-05-29T02:16:17Z | 2019-05-29T02:16:17Z | OWNER | In that case `--fk othertable` detects the primary key. If you want to point at a different column, use `--fk-col X` | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
413867537 | |
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16#issuecomment-496756758 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16 | 496756758 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njc1Njc1OA== | 9599 | 2019-05-29T02:14:50Z | 2019-05-29T02:14:50Z | OWNER | Hmm... probably not: > For options, only a fixed number of arguments is supported. | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
413867537 | |
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16#issuecomment-496756348 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/16 | 496756348 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njc1NjM0OA== | 9599 | 2019-05-29T02:12:43Z | 2019-05-29T02:12:43Z | OWNER | For the CLI I'm thinking: sqlite-utils add-column data.db mytable col text --fk othertable id So the foreign key is added using `--fk othertable othercolumn` If the user doesn't provide the column type we can derive it from the foreign key. Can we make the `othercolumn` optional? That would be neat - then we could automatically detect it using the sole primary key of the referenced table. | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
413867537 |