github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
611284481 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyODQ0ODE= | 38 | [Feature Request] Support Repo Name in Search 🥺 | 5779832 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2020-05-02T22:08:51Z | 2020-05-03T02:34:32Z | 2020-05-02T23:15:11Z | NONE | ## Description Per your [v2.2 release tweet](https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1256700238099693568) I played with the demo, but the output did not match my expectations. ## Expected Behavior Expected a search query for "twitter" contained within the `repo` column to return non-zero results. ## Actual Behavior 😭 [0 rows where repo contains "twitter" sorted by starred_at descending](https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/stars?repo__contains=twitter&_sort_desc=starred_at) ## Best Explanation Per the table schema (see appendix) `repo` is of type `INTEGER` which built from `repo_id` and does not expose the repo name in search. ## Desired Behavior Given that searching for "206156866" is less intuitive than "twitter", it would be great to support this via extending the search capabilities or by adding an additional column. ✅ 104 rows where repo contains "twitter" ❌ [104 rows where repo contains "206156866" sorted by starred_at descending](https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/stars?repo__contains=206156866&_sort_desc=starred_at) ## Appendix ``` CREATE TABLE [stars] ( [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [starred_at] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([user], [repo]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_stars_repo] ON [stars] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_stars_user] ON [stars] ([user]); ``` | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/38/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
493670730 | MDU6SXNzdWU0OTM2NzA3MzA= | 4 | Command to fetch stargazers for one or more repos | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8 | 2019-09-14T21:58:22Z | 2020-05-02T21:30:27Z | 2020-05-02T21:30:27Z | MEMBER | Maybe this: $ github-to-sqlite stargazers github.db simonw/datasette It could accept more than one repos. Maybe have options similar to `--sql` in [twitter-to-sqlite](https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite) so you can e.g. fetch all stargazers for all of the repos you have fetched into the database already (or all of the repos belonging to owner X) | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/4/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
611252244 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyNTIyNDQ= | 750 | Add notlike table filter | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2020-05-02T18:54:36Z | 2020-05-02T19:10:44Z | 2020-05-02T19:10:44Z | OWNER | I found myself wanting that for applying the opposite of this: https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/dependent_repos?dependent__like=%25simonw%2F%25&_sort_desc=dependent_stars | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/750/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
520756546 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MjA3NTY1NDY= | 12 | Add this view for seeing new releases | 9599 | closed | 0 | 5 | 2019-11-11T06:00:12Z | 2020-05-02T18:58:18Z | 2020-05-02T18:58:17Z | MEMBER | ```sql CREATE VIEW recent_releases AS select json_object("label", repos.full_name, "href", repos.html_url) as repo, json_object( "href", releases.html_url, "label", releases.name ) as release, substr(releases.published_at, 0, 11) as date, releases.body as body_markdown, releases.published_at from releases join repos on repos.id = releases.repo order by releases.published_at desc ``` | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/12/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
609950090 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MDk5NTAwOTA= | 33 | Fall back to authentication via ENV | 2029 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2020-04-30T12:58:14Z | 2020-05-02T18:46:10Z | 2020-05-02T18:45:37Z | NONE | Would you accept a PR that falls back to looking for an environment variable for the GitHub token? Specifically a change here: https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/c34d5a18bfc41fa08755ba3d5cf9fe09ff204238/github_to_sqlite/cli.py#L271 I'd like to use `github-to-sqlite` in a GitHub Action workflow and this would be simpler than trying to fill out the prompt or generate a file with sensitive content. Wanted to check first, I'm happy to submit a PR with tests and updates to the docs. | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/33/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
610511450 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTA1MTE0NTA= | 35 | Create index on issue_comments(user) and other foreign keys | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2020-05-01T02:06:56Z | 2020-05-02T18:26:24Z | 2020-05-02T18:26:24Z | MEMBER | ``` create index issue_comments_user on issue_comments(user) ``` I'm sure there are other user columns that could benefit from an index. | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/35/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
610842926 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTA4NDI5MjY= | 36 | Add view for better display of dependent repos | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2020-05-01T16:33:44Z | 2020-05-02T16:50:31Z | 2020-05-02T16:30:11Z | MEMBER | ```sql select repos.full_name as repo, 'https://github.com/' || repos2.full_name as dependent, repos2.created_at as dependent_repo_created, repos2.updated_at as dependent_repo_updated, repos2.stargazers_count as dependent_repo_stars, repos2.watchers_count as dependent_repo_watchers from dependents join repos as repos2 on dependents.dependent = repos2.id join repos on dependents.repo = repos.id order by repos2.created_at desc ``` https://dogsheep.simonwillison.net/github?sql=select%0D%0A++repos.full_name+as+repo%2C%0D%0A++%27https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2F%27+%7C%7C+repos2.full_name+as+dependent%2C%0D%0A++repos2.created_at+as+dependent_repo_created%2C%0D%0A++repos2.updated_at+as+dependent_repo_updated%2C%0D%0A++repos2.stargazers_count+as+dependent_repo_stars%2C%0D%0A++repos2.watchers_count+as+dependent_repo_watchers%0D%0Afrom%0D%0A++dependents%0D%0A++join+repos+as+repos2+on+dependents.dependent+%3D+repos2.id%0D%0A++join+repos+on+dependents.repo+%3D+repos.id%0D%0Aorder+by%0D%0A++repos2.created_at+desc | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/36/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
516967682 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MTY5Njc2ODI= | 10 | Add this repos_starred view | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2019-11-04T05:44:38Z | 2020-05-02T16:37:36Z | 2020-05-02T16:37:36Z | MEMBER | ```sql create view repos_starred as select stars.starred_at, users.login, repos.* from repos join stars on repos.id = stars.repo join users on repos.owner = users.id order by starred_at desc; ``` | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/10/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
610843136 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTA4NDMxMzY= | 37 | Mechanism for creating views if they don't yet exist | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2020-05-01T16:34:10Z | 2020-05-02T16:19:47Z | 2020-05-02T16:19:31Z | MEMBER | Needed for #36 #10 #12 | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/37/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
611216862 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyMTY4NjI= | 106 | create_view(..., ignore=True, replace=True) parameters | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2020-05-02T15:45:21Z | 2020-05-02T16:04:51Z | 2020-05-02T16:02:10Z | OWNER | Two new parameters which specify what should happen if the view already exists. I want this for https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/37 Here's the current `create_view()` implementation: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/b4d953d3ccef28bb81cea40ca165a647b59971fa/sqlite_utils/db.py#L325-L332 `ignore=True` will not do anything if the view exists already. `replace=True` will drop and redefine the view - but only if its SQL definition differs, otherwise it will be left alone. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/106/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |