github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1421529723 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UutJ7 | 1850 | Write API in Datasette core | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 13 | 2022-10-24T22:13:24Z | 2022-11-29T20:11:20Z | 2022-11-29T20:11:20Z | OWNER | I need this for Datasette Cloud, and in thinking it through I realized that it's really time Datasette grew a default write API as well. I'm going to mostly model this off `sqlite-utils`, since I've spent a bunch of time iterating on a pseudo-JSON API for that over the past few years (piping JSON to stdin etc). I want this for Datasette 1.0. I'm going to be building it in the new [1.0-dev](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/tree/1.0-dev) branch, which is automatically deployed to https://latest-1-0-dev.datasette.io/ running on Cloud Run. API features to build: - [x] #1852 - [x] #1856 - [x] #1857 - [x] #1858 - [x] #1859 - [x] #1871 - [x] #1888 - [x] #1868 - [x] #1851 - [x] #1863 - [x] #1864 - [x] #1866 - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882 - [x] #1862 - [x] #1874 - [x] https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1887 - [x] #1877 Bumped to later on: - #1855 - #1878 - #1873 - #1875 - Make sure CORS works - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1889 - Alter a table - `sqlite-utils transform` style (more powerful than straight ALTER) - Execute SQL against a write connection - Maybe even multiple write SQL statements bundled in a single transaction - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1867 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1850/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1421544654 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UuwzO | 1851 | API to insert a single record into an existing table | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 22 | 2022-10-24T22:24:21Z | 2022-11-15T19:59:18Z | 2022-10-28T00:59:25Z | OWNER | Controlled by a new `insert-row` permission. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
1421552095 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Uuynf | 1852 | Default API token authentication mechanism | 9599 | closed | 0 | 8658075 | 30 | 2022-10-24T22:31:07Z | 2022-11-15T19:57:00Z | 2022-10-26T02:19:54Z | OWNER | API authentication will be via `Authorization: Bearer XXX` request headers. I'm inclined to add a default token mechanism to Datasette based on tokens that are signed with the `DATASETTE_SECRET`. Maybe the root user can access `/-/create-token` which provides a UI for generating a time-limited signed token? Could also have a `datasette token` command for creating such tokens at the command-line. Plugins can then define alternative ways of creating tokens, such as the existing https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-auth-tokens plugin. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1850#issuecomment-1289706439_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1852/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |