github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1816851056 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sSvJw | 568 | table.create(..., replace=True) | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7 | 2023-07-22T18:12:22Z | 2023-07-22T19:25:35Z | 2023-07-22T19:15:44Z | OWNER | Found myself using this pattern to quickly prototype a schema: ```python import sqlite_utils db = sqlite_utils.Database(memory=True) print(db["answers_chunks"].create({ "id": int, "content": str, "embedding_type_id": int, "embedding": bytes, "embedding_content_md5": str, "source": str, }, pk="id", transform=True).schema) ``` <img width="472" alt="image" src="https://github.com/simonw/datasette-answers/assets/9599/30237f7c-4964-4190-984c-d824c57939a9"> Using `replace=True` to drop and then recreate the table would be neat here, and would be consistent with other places that use `replace=True`. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/568/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816852402 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sSvey | 569 | register_command plugin hook | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2023-07-22T18:17:27Z | 2023-07-22T19:19:35Z | 2023-07-22T19:19:35Z | OWNER | > I'm going to start by adding the `register_command` hook using the exact same pattern as Datasette and LLM. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/567#issuecomment-1646643450_ | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/569/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816857105 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sSwoR | 570 | `sqlite-utils install -e` option | 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2023-07-22T18:32:23Z | 2023-07-22T18:55:59Z | 2023-07-22T18:32:56Z | OWNER | As seen in LLM. Needed while working on: - #567 | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/570/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816857442 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5sSwti | 2106 | `datasette install -e` option | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2023-07-22T18:33:42Z | 2023-07-26T18:28:33Z | 2023-07-22T18:42:54Z | OWNER | As seen in LLM and now in `sqlite-utils` too: - https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/570 Useful for developing plugins, see tutorial at https://llm.datasette.io/en/stable/plugins/tutorial-model-plugin.html | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2106/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816876211 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sS1Sz | 571 | `.transform(keep_table=...)` option | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2023-07-22T19:49:29Z | 2023-07-22T22:32:18Z | 2023-07-22T22:32:18Z | OWNER | >> Also need a design for an option for the `.transform()` method to indicate that the new table should be created with a new name without dropping the old one. > > I think `keep_table="name_of_table"` is good for this. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/565#issuecomment-1646657324_ | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/571/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816877910 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sS1tW | 572 | Don't test Python 3.7 against textual | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2023-07-22T19:57:03Z | 2023-07-22T22:16:50Z | 2023-07-22T22:16:50Z | OWNER | Spotted this in the GitHub Actions logs: ![IMG_5046](https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/assets/9599/81fb1093-cd8a-4019-a612-2e49b500c933) | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/572/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816918185 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sS_ip | 574 | `prepare_connection()` plugin hook | 9599 | closed | 0 | 3 | 2023-07-22T22:52:47Z | 2023-07-22T23:13:14Z | 2023-07-22T22:59:10Z | OWNER | > Splitting off an issue for `prepare_connection()` since Alex got the PR in seconds before I shipped 3.34! _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/567#issuecomment-1646686424_ | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/574/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816919568 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5sS_4Q | 575 | Python API ability to opt-out of connection plugins | 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2023-07-22T23:01:13Z | 2023-07-22T23:17:22Z | 2023-07-22T23:08:22Z | OWNER | Plugins affecting the CLI by default makes sense to me. I'm less confident about them _always_ affecting users of the Python API. I'm going to have them apply by default, but I'm going to add a mechanism to opt-out on an individual database basis. Basically this: ```python from sqlite_utils import Database db = Database(memory=True, execute_plugins=False) # Anything using db from here on will not execute plugins ``` cc @asg017 Refs: - #567 - #574 | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/575/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1816830546 | I_kwDODEm0Qs5sSqJS | 73 | Twitter v1 API shutdown | 6341745 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-07-22T16:57:41Z | 2023-07-22T16:57:41Z | NONE | I've been using this project reliably over the past two years to periodically download my liked tweets, but unfortunately since 19th July I get: ``` [2023-07-19 21:00:04.937536] File "/home/pi/code/liked-tweets/lib/python3.7/site-packages/twitter_to_sqlite/utils.py", line 202, in fetch_timeline [2023-07-19 21:00:04.937606] raise Exception(str(tweets["errors"])) [2023-07-19 21:00:04.937678] Exception: [{'message': 'You currently have access to a subset of Twitter API v2 endpoints and limited v1.1 endpoints (e.g. media post, oauth) only. If you need access to this endpoint, you may need a different access level. You can learn more here: https://developer.twitter.com/en/portal/product', 'code': 453}] ``` It appears like Twitter has now shut down their v1 endpoints, which is rather gracious of them, considering they [announced they'd be deprecated on 29th April](https://twittercommunity.com/t/reminder-to-migrate-to-the-new-free-basic-or-enterprise-plans-of-the-twitter-api/189737). Unfortunately [retrieving likes using the v2 API](https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/tweets/likes/introduction) is not part of their [free plan](https://developer.twitter.com/en/portal/products). In fact, with the free plan one can only post and delete tweets and retrieve information about oneself. So I'm afraid this is the end of this very nice project. It was very useful, thank you! | 206156866 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/73/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1 } |