github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1292370469 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5NCAIl | 1765 | Document plugins providing new plugin hook- | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2022-07-03T17:05:14Z | 2023-08-31T23:08:24Z | 2023-08-31T23:06:31Z | OWNER | I've used this pattern twice now: https://til.simonwillison.net/datasette/register-new-plugin-hooks - in `datasette-graphql` and `datasette-low-disk-space-hook`. I should describe the pattern on https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/writing_plugins.html | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1765/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1865869205 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5vNueV | 2157 | Proposal: Make the `_internal` database persistent, customizable, and hidden | 15178711 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-08-24T20:54:29Z | 2023-08-31T02:45:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The current `_internal` database is used by Datasette core to cache info about databases/tables/columns/foreign keys of databases in a Datasette instance. It's a temporary database created at startup, that can only be seen by the root user. See an [example `_internal` DB here](https://latest.datasette.io/_internal), after [logging in as root](https://latest.datasette.io/login-as-root). The current `_internal` database has a few rough edges: - It's part of `datasette.databases`, so many plugins have to specifically exclude `_internal` from their queries [examples here](https://github.com/search?q=datasette+hookimpl+%22_internal%22+language%3APython+-path%3Adatasette%2F&ref=opensearch&type=code) - It's only used by Datasette core and can't be used by plugins or 3rd parties - It's created from scratch at startup and stored in memory. Why is fine, the performance is great, but persistent storage would be nice. Additionally, it would be really nice if plugins could use this `_internal` database to store their own configuration, secrets, and settings. For example: - `datasette-auth-tokens` [creates a `_datasette_auth_tokens` table](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens/blob/main/datasette_auth_tokens/__init__.py#L15) to store auth token metadata. This could be moved into the `_internal` database to avoid writing to the gues database - `datasette-socrata` [creates a `socrata_imports`](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-socrata/blob/1409aa9b4d2fc3aff286b52e73af33b5786d56d0/datasette_socrata/__init__.py#L190-L198) table, which also can be in `_internal` - `datasette-upload-csvs` [creates a `_csv_progress_`](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-upload-csvs/blob/main/datasette_upload_csvs/__init__.py#L154) table, which can be in `_internal` - `datasette-write-ui` wants to have the ability for users to toggle whether a table appears editable, which can be either in `datasette.yaml` or on-the-fly by storing config in `_internal` In general, these are specific features that Datasette plugins wou… | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2157/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1871935751 | I_kwDOD079W85vk3kH | 40 | ImportError: cannot import name 'formatargspec' from 'inspect' | 36752421 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2023-08-29T15:36:31Z | 2023-08-31T03:18:07Z | 2023-08-31T03:18:06Z | NONE | I get the following error when running "pip3 install dogsheep-photos" " from inspect import ismethod, isclass, formatargspec ImportError: cannot import name 'formatargspec' from 'inspect' (/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.12/lib/python3.12/inspect.py). Did you mean: 'formatargvalues'?" Python 3.12.0rc1 sqlite 3.43.0 datasette, version 0.64.3 | 256834907 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/40/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
1875739055 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5vzYGv | 2167 | Document return type of await ds.permission_allowed() | 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-08-31T15:14:23Z | 2023-08-31T15:14:23Z | OWNER | The return type isn't documented here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4c3ef033110407f3b3dbce501659d523724985e0/docs/internals.rst#L327-L350 On inspecting the code I'm not 100% sure if it's possible for this. method to return `None`, or if it can only return `True` or `False`. Need to confirm that. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4c3ef033110407f3b3dbce501659d523724985e0/datasette/app.py#L822C15-L853 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2167/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1876407598 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5v17Uu | 2169 | execute-sql on a database should imply view-database/view-permission | 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2023-08-31T22:45:56Z | 2023-08-31T22:46:28Z | 2023-08-31T22:46:28Z | OWNER | I noticed that a token with `execute-sql` permission alone did not work, because it was not allowed to view the instance of the database. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2169/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |