github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1978023780 | I_kwDOBm6k_c515j9k | 2205 | request.post_vars() method obliterates form keys with multiple values | 9599 | open | 0 | 8755003 | 3 | 2023-11-05T23:25:08Z | 2023-11-06T04:10:34Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/452a587e236ef642cbc6ae345b58767ea8420cb5/datasette/utils/asgi.py#L137-L139 In GET requests you can do `?foo=1&foo=2` - you can do the same in POST requests, but the `dict()` call here eliminates those duplicates. You can't even try calling `post_body()` and implement your own custom parsing because of: - #2204 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2205/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1838469176 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5tlNA4 | 2127 | Context base class to support documenting the context | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2023-08-07T00:01:02Z | 2023-08-10T01:30:25Z | OWNER | This idea first came up here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2112#issuecomment-1652751140 If `datasette.render_template(...)` takes an optional `Context` subclass as an alternative to a context dictionary, I could then use dataclasses to define the context made available to specific templates - which then gives me something I can use to help document what they are. Also refs: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1510 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2127/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1822939274 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp9iK | 2113 | Implement and document extras for the new query view page | 9599 | open | 0 | 8755003 | 3 | 2023-07-26T18:24:01Z | 2023-08-09T17:35:22Z | OWNER | - #2109 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2113/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1054244712 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1n9o | 1510 | Datasette 1.0 documented template context (maybe via API docs) | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2021-11-15T23:23:58Z | 2023-06-28T02:05:21Z | OWNER | Documented context plus protective unit tests. Goal is that custom templates built for 1.x will not break without a 2.x release. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1510/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1525815985 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5a8hqx | 1983 | Make CustomJSONEncoder a documented public API | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-01-09T15:27:05Z | 2023-01-09T15:35:58Z | OWNER | It's used by `datasette-geojson` here: https://github.com/eyeseast/datasette-geojson/commit/902bf135a5a33a0dc8264673d00a59a67cb05152 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1983/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1082584499 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ahu2z | 1558 | Redesign `facet_results` JSON structure prior to Datasette 1.0 | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2021-12-16T19:45:10Z | 2023-01-09T15:31:17Z | OWNER | > Decision: as an initial fix I'm going to de-duplicate those keys by using `tags__array` etc - with a `_2` on the end if that key is already used. > > I'll open a separate issue to redesign this better for Datasette 1.0. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/625#issuecomment-996130862_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1558/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1175690070 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW | 1676 | Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing? | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2022-03-21T17:14:57Z | 2022-12-02T01:23:40Z | OWNER | > Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions > >> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted. >> >> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`: > > That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1410305897 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5UD49p | 1845 | Reconsider the Datasette first-run experience | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2022-10-15T22:21:31Z | 2022-10-16T08:54:53Z | OWNER | Had a really interesting conversation today about how hard it is to get from "I installed Datasette" to "I've done something useful with it": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33216789#33218590 Spending some time focusing on that first-run experience feels very worthwhile. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1845/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1386917344 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c4_prjN | 1823 | Keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2022-09-27T00:44:59Z | 2022-10-05T04:37:54Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/1823 | Refs #1822 <!-- readthedocs-preview datasette start --> ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1823.org.readthedocs.build/en/1823/ <!-- readthedocs-preview datasette end --> | 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1823/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
1386854246 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sqbdm | 1822 | Switch to keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2022-09-26T23:20:38Z | 2022-09-27T00:44:04Z | OWNER | This is a good idea, and one that needs to happen before Datasette 1.0: > While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive? > > Thinking out loud: > > ``` > async def render_template( > self, templates, *, context=None, plugin_context=None, request=None, view_name=None > ): > ``` _Originally posted by @jefftriplett in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1822/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
838245338 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MzgyNDUzMzg= | 1272 | Unit tests for the Dockerfile | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-03-23T01:36:29Z | 2022-07-29T10:22:59Z | OWNER | Working on the Dockerfile in #1249 made me wish for automated tests - to confirm that it boots up correctly, can run SpatiaLite and doesn't have weird bugs like the `/db` page hanging. These could run in CI too, but maybe only if the `Dockerfile` is updated. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1272/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1054243511 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1nq3 | 1509 | Datasette 1.0 JSON API (and documentation) | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2021-11-15T23:22:45Z | 2022-03-15T20:38:56Z | OWNER | The new JSON API in a stable, documented form. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1509/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1122451096 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c4x_mXy | 1626 | Try test suite against macOS and Windows | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2022-02-02T22:26:51Z | 2022-02-03T01:22:44Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/1626 | Refs #1625 | 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1626/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
534629631 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MzQ2Mjk2MzE= | 650 | Add a glossary to the documentation | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-12-09T00:23:45Z | 2022-01-13T22:04:56Z | OWNER | Call it `glossary.rst` - it can use a definition list something like this: ```rst .. _glossary: Glossary ======== Term A definition of the term. Another term Another definition. ``` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/650/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
793002853 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTYwNzYwMTQ1 | 1204 | WIP: Plugin includes | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-01-25T03:59:06Z | 2021-12-17T07:10:49Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/1204 | Refs #1191 Next steps: - [ ] Get comfortable that this pattern is the right way to go - [ ] Implement it for all of the other pages, not just the table page - [ ] Add a new set of plugin tests that exercise ALL of these new hook locations - [ ] Document, then ship | 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1204/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | ||||||
636511683 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzY1MTE2ODM= | 830 | Redesign register_facet_classes plugin hook | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2020-06-10T20:03:27Z | 2021-12-16T19:58:22Z | OWNER | Nothing uses this plugin hook yet, so the design is not yet proven. I'm going to build a real plugin against it and use that process to inform any design changes that may need to be made. I'll add a warning about this to the documentation. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/830/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
903902495 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MDM5MDI0OTU= | 1342 | Improve `path_with_replaced_args()` and friends and document them | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-05-27T15:18:28Z | 2021-05-27T15:23:02Z | OWNER | > In order to cleanly implement this I need to expose the `path_with_replaced_args` utility function to Datasette's template engine. This is the first time this will become an exposed (and hence should-by-documented) API and I don't like its shape much. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1337#issuecomment-849721280_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1342/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
642296989 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDIyOTY5ODk= | 856 | Consider pagination of canned queries | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-06-20T03:15:59Z | 2021-05-21T14:22:41Z | OWNER | The new `canned_queries()` plugin hook from #852 combined with plugins like https://github.com/simonw/datasette-saved-queries could mean that some installations end up with hundreds or even thousands of canned queries. I should consider pagination or some other way of ensuring that this doesn't cause performance problems for Datasette. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/856/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
741862364 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NDE4NjIzNjQ= | 1090 | Custom widgets for canned query forms | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-11-12T19:21:07Z | 2021-03-27T16:25:25Z | OWNER | This is an idea that was cut from the first version of writable canned queries: > I really want the option to use a `<textarea>` for a specific value. > > Idea: metadata syntax like this: > > ```json > { > "databases": { > "my-database": { > "queries": { > "add_twitter_handle": { > "sql": "insert into twitter_handles (username) values (:username)", > "write": true, > "params": { > "username": { > "widget": "textarea" > } > } > } > } > } > } > } > ``` > > I can ship with some default widgets and provide a plugin hook for registering extra widgets. > > This opens up some really exciting possibilities for things like map widgets that let you draw polygons. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-608125928_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1090/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
837350092 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MzczNTAwOTI= | 1270 | Try implementing SQLite timeouts using .interrupt() instead of using .set_progress_handler() | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-03-22T06:00:17Z | 2021-03-23T16:45:39Z | OWNER | > Maybe I could implement SQLite query timeouts using the `interrupt()` method instead of the progress handler hack I'm currently using? > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43240496/python-sqlite3-how-to-quickly-and-cleanly-interrupt-long-running-query-with-e has some tips. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1268#issuecomment-803764919_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1270/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
837956424 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTk4MjEzNTY1 | 1271 | Use SQLite conn.interrupt() instead of sqlite_timelimit() | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-03-22T17:34:20Z | 2021-03-22T21:49:27Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/1271 | Refs #1270, #1268, #1249 Before merging this I need to do some more testing (to make sure that expensive queries really are properly cancelled). I also need to delete a bunch of code relating to the old mechanism of cancelling queries. [See comment below: this doesn't actually cancel the query due to a thread-local confusion] | 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1271/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | ||||||
769520939 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Njk1MjA5Mzk= | 1149 | Make it easier to theme Datasette with CSS | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2020-12-17T05:01:26Z | 2021-03-22T21:43:16Z | OWNER | I want to theme https://datasette.io/ so that when you visit https://datasette.io/content (the Datasette UI part of it) the navigation from the parent site is used. I tried dropping in a `base.html` template like this: ```html {% extends "page_base.html" %} {% block base_extra_head %} <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no"> {% for url in extra_css_urls %} <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ url.url }}"{% if url.sri %} integrity="{{ url.sri }}" crossorigin="anonymous"{% endif %}> {% endfor %} {% for url in extra_js_urls %} <script src="{{ url.url }}"{% if url.sri %} integrity="{{ url.sri }}" crossorigin="anonymous"{% endif %}></script> {% endfor %} {% block extra_head %}{% endblock %} {% endblock %} {% block extra_body_end %} {% include "_close_open_menus.html" %} {% for body_script in body_scripts %} <script>{{ body_script }}</script> {% endfor %} {% endblock %} ``` But this resulted in pages looking like this: <img width="1067" alt="content__categories__3_rows" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/102446045-c168e280-3fe1-11eb-94d6-e7350798eb96.png"> Note that the cog menu is broken and the filter UI is unstyled. To get these working correctly I would need to copy over a whole lot of Datasette's default CSS - and that means that when Datasette changes in the future those pages could break in subtle ways. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1149/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
799663959 | MDU6SXNzdWU3OTk2NjM5NTk= | 1213 | gzip support for HTML (and JSON) responses | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-02-02T20:36:28Z | 2021-02-02T20:41:55Z | OWNER | This page https://datasette-tiles-demo.datasette.io/San_Francisco/tiles is 2MB because of all of the base64 images. Gzipped it's 1.5MB. Since Datasette is usually deployed without a frontend gzipping proxy, Datasette itself needs to solve for this. Gzipping everything won't work because some endpoints - the all-rows CSV endpoint and the download-database endpoint - are streaming and hence can't be buffered-and-gzipped. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1213/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
613422636 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTM0MjI2MzY= | 760 | Way of seeing full schema for a database | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-05-06T15:46:08Z | 2020-05-06T23:49:06Z | OWNER | I find myself wanting to quickly figure out all of the BLOB columns in a database. A `/-/schema` page showing the full schema (actually since it's per-database probably `/dbname/-/schema` or `/-/schema/dbname`) would be really handy. It would need to be carefully constructed from various queries against `sqlite_master` - just doing `select * from sqlite_master where type='table'` isn't quite enough because I also want to show indexes, triggers etc. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/760/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
465327844 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ= | 553 | Potential improvements to facet-by-date | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-07-08T15:37:53Z | 2019-07-08T15:41:55Z | OWNER | In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696 > I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful! Screenshot of that link: <img width="1092" alt="django_tickets__tickets__29_846_rows" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/60823090-9f680100-a15b-11e9-84e9-52b9d666e90f.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
327395270 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjczOTUyNzA= | 296 | Per-database and per-table /-/ URL namespace | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2018-05-29T16:23:13Z | 2019-06-28T16:46:34Z | OWNER | Initially this will be for subsets of `/-/inspect` and `/-/metadata` but it will also give us a URL namespace for future features like `/-/facet` (expanded list of a specific facet, linked to from `...`) and `/-/graph` To start: * `/dbname/-/inspect` * `/dbname/-/metadata` * `/dbname/tablename/-/inspect` * `/dbname/tablename/-/metadata` This means we will no longer allow databases or tables to have the name `"-"` - I think that's OK We will continue to support rows with a primary key of `"-"` at the following URL: * `/dbname/tablename/-` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/296/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
400340905 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MDAzNDA5MDU= | 402 | Use SQLITE_DBCONFIG_DEFENSIVE plus other recommendations from SQLite security docs | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-01-17T15:52:28Z | 2019-01-17T16:15:21Z | OWNER | > Was just having a skim through the datasette source. Given that the vuln impacts shadow tables, wasn't sure whether these are also covered by the immutable flag. Latest release introduced a SQLITE_DBCONFIG_DEFENSIVE flag that they recommend setting: https://sqlite.org/security.html https://twitter.com/ignoredambience/status/1085926961413869568 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/402/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |