github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
465327844 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ= | 553 | Potential improvements to facet-by-date | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-07-08T15:37:53Z | 2019-07-08T15:41:55Z | OWNER | In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696 > I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful! Screenshot of that link: <img width="1092" alt="django_tickets__tickets__29_846_rows" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/60823090-9f680100-a15b-11e9-84e9-52b9d666e90f.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
445868234 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDU4NjgyMzQ= | 478 | Make it so Docker build doesn't delay PyPI release | 9599 | closed | 0 | 4471010 | 3 | 2019-05-19T21:52:10Z | 2019-07-08T03:30:41Z | 2019-07-07T20:03:20Z | OWNER | Datasette automated releases currently include building a Docker image that has a full custom-compiled version of SQLite and SpatiaLite. This takes ages! I still want to publish this Docker image (to https://hub.docker.com/r/datasetteproject/datasette/tags ) but I'd like it if this wasn't a blocker on pushing the new package to PyPI. Ideally PyPI publish would happen first. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/478/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | |||||
464868844 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjQ4Njg4NDQ= | 543 | datasette publish option for setting plugin configuration secrets | 9599 | closed | 0 | 4471010 | 3 | 2019-07-06T16:21:23Z | 2019-07-08T02:06:34Z | 2019-07-08T02:06:34Z | OWNER | Follow-on from #538 - the `datasette publish` command needs a way of passing secrets which will be made available to plugin configuration but will not be exposed in `/-/metadata.json`. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/543/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |