github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1558644003 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5c5wUj | 2006 | Teach `datasette publish` to pin to `datasette<1.0` in a 0.x release | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 2 | 2023-01-26T19:17:40Z | 2023-01-26T19:20:53Z | OWNER | I just realized that when I ship Datasette 1.0 there may be automated deployments out there which could deploy the 1.0 version by accident, potentially breaking any customizations that aren't compatible with the 1.0 changes. I can hopefully help avoid that by shipping one last entry in the `0.x` series that ensures `datasette publish` pins to `<1.0` when it installs Datasette itself. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2006/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1174717287 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBMNn | 1674 | Tweak design of /.json | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-20T22:58:01Z | 2022-03-20T22:58:40Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/.json Currently: ```json { "_memory": { "name": "_memory", "hash": null, "color": "a6c7b9", "path": "/_memory", "tables_and_views_truncated": [], "tables_and_views_more": false, "tables_count": 0, "table_rows_sum": 0, "show_table_row_counts": false, "hidden_table_rows_sum": 0, "hidden_tables_count": 0, "views_count": 0, "private": false }, "fixtures": { "name": "fixtures", "hash": "645005884646eb941c89997fbd1c0dd6be517cb1b493df9816ae497c0c5afbaa", "color": "645005", "path": "/fixtures", "tables_and_views_truncated": [ { "name": "compound_three_primary_keys", "columns": [ "pk1", "pk2", "pk3", "content" ], "primary_keys": [ "pk1", "pk2", "pk3" ], "count": 1001, "hidden": false, "fts_table": null, "num_relationships_for_sorting": 0, "private": false }, ``` As-of this issue the `"path"` key is confusing, it doesn't match what https://latest.datasette.io/-/databases returns: - #1668 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1674/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1131295060 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5DbjFU | 1634 | Update Dockerfile generated by `datasette publish` | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 4 | 2022-02-11T00:07:26Z | 2022-03-11T17:38:08Z | OWNER | The generated `Dockerfile` currently looks something like this: ```Dockerfile FROM python:3.8 COPY . /app WORKDIR /app ENV DATASETTE_SECRET 'edab49cbc5d5f6f33238f54852037e3fee710821960b73edd2ce743454182ae2' RUN pip install -U datasette datasette-auth-passwords datasette-tiddlywiki datasette-graphql RUN datasette inspect fixtures.db other.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json ENV PORT 8080 EXPOSE 8080 CMD datasette serve --host 0.0.0.0 -i fixtures.db -i other.db --cors --inspect-file inspect-data.json --metadata metadata.json --create --port $PORT /data/*.db ``` This is still on Python 3.8, and it generates a pretty large image compared to the `Dockerfile` used for https://hub.docker.com/datasetteproject/datasette - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.60.2/Dockerfile Here's the code that generates it: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L389-L400 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1634/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 2, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1065429936 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gSuw | 1532 | Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0 | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 4 | 2021-11-28T20:37:18Z | 2022-03-16T20:13:34Z | OWNER | I realized that one of the reasons I'm having trouble committing to nailing down the JSON API for 1.0 is that I don't use it much myself - I use the `?_shape=array` one quite often, but I don't have any projects that are using the default, more fully-featured API. As an experiment I built a Web Component for embedding Datasette tables on pages - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-table - and I think it's actually going to be a really useful tool for helping me dog food the v1.0 API design. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
730210880 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MzAyMTA4ODA= | 1055 | query.html and table.html should share the same table implementation | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 0 | 2020-10-27T07:58:21Z | 2020-10-27T07:58:29Z | OWNER | In #998 I made a change that affected the table page but didn't affect the query page because I incorrectly assumed they shared rendering logic. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1055/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
749283032 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NDkyODMwMzI= | 1101 | register_output_renderer() should support streaming data | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 13 | 2020-11-24T02:17:09Z | 2023-01-21T22:07:19Z | OWNER | > I'd like to implement this by first extending the `register_output_renderer()` hook to support streaming huge responses, then switching CSV to use the plugin hook in addition to TSV using it. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1096#issuecomment-732542285_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1101/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |