github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1891614971 | I_kwDOCGYnMM5wv8D7 | 594 | Represent compound foreign keys in table.foreign_keys output | 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2023-09-12T03:48:24Z | 2023-09-12T03:51:13Z | OWNER | Given this schema: ```sql CREATE TABLE departments ( campus_name TEXT NOT NULL, dept_code TEXT NOT NULL, dept_name TEXT, PRIMARY KEY (campus_name, dept_code) ); CREATE TABLE courses ( course_code TEXT PRIMARY KEY, course_name TEXT, campus_name TEXT NOT NULL, dept_code TEXT NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY (campus_name, dept_code) REFERENCES departments(campus_name, dept_code) ); ``` The output of `db["courses"].foreign_keys` right now is: ``` [ForeignKey(table='courses', column='campus_name', other_table='departments', other_column='campus_name'), ForeignKey(table='courses', column='dept_code', other_table='departments', other_column='dept_code')] ``` Which suggests two normal foreign keys, not one compound foreign key. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/594/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
974067156 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NzQwNjcxNTY= | 318 | Research: handle gzipped CSV directly | 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-08-18T21:23:04Z | 2021-08-18T21:25:30Z | OWNER | Would it be worthwhile for the `sqlite-utils` command-line tool to grow features to efficiently directly interact with gzipped CSV data? Maybe add `--gz` options to both `insert` and to the various commands that output query results. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/318/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
961008507 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NjEwMDg1MDc= | 308 | Add an interactive tutorial as a Jupyter notebook | 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-08-04T20:34:22Z | 2021-08-04T21:30:59Z | OWNER | Can show people how to open this up in Binder. | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/308/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
695441530 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTU0NDE1MzA= | 154 | OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction | 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-09-07T23:42:44Z | 2020-09-07T23:47:10Z | OWNER | I'm getting this error when running: sqlite-utils enable-wal beta.db `OperationalError: cannot change into wal mode from within a transaction` I'm worried that maybe that's because of this new code from #152: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/deb2eb013ff85bbc828ebc244a9654f0d9c3139e/sqlite_utils/db.py#L128-L129 | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/154/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |