github
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1690#issuecomment-1079788375 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1690 | 1079788375 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5AXENX | 9599 | 2022-03-26T22:43:00Z | 2022-03-26T22:43:00Z | OWNER | Then I can update this section of the documentation which currently recommends the above pattern: https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/authentication.html#the-ds-actor-cookie | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1182141761 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1690#issuecomment-1079788346 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1690 | 1079788346 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5AXEM6 | 9599 | 2022-03-26T22:42:40Z | 2022-03-26T22:42:40Z | OWNER | I don't want to do a `response.set_actor_cookie()` method because I like `Response` not to carry too many Datasette-specific features. So `datasette.set_actor_cookie(response, actor, expire_after=None)` would be a better place for this I think. | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1182141761 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1689#issuecomment-1079779040 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1689 | 1079779040 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5AXB7g | 9599 | 2022-03-26T21:35:57Z | 2022-03-26T21:35:57Z | OWNER | Fixed: https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/internals.html#add-message-request-message-type-datasette-info | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1182065616 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1688#issuecomment-1079582485 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1688 | 1079582485 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5AWR8V | 9599 | 2022-03-26T03:15:34Z | 2022-03-26T03:15:34Z | OWNER | Yup, you're right in what you figured out here: stand-alone plugins can't currently package static assets other then using the static folder. The `datasette-plugin` cookiecutter template should make creating a Python package pretty easy though: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-plugin You can run that yourself, or you can run it using this GitHub template repository: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-plugin-template-repository | { "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1181432624 |