github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
721068929 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjEwNjg5Mjk= | 1020 | Method for datasette.client() to forward on authentication | 9599 | open | 0 | 6 | 2020-10-14T01:47:49Z | 2020-10-19T22:45:01Z | OWNER | I stumbled into this while working on Dogsheep Beta: the requests it re-dispatched through `TableView` did not carry authentication cookies, and since this was against a private instance they were thus denied. https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/blob/bed9df2b3ef68189e2e445427721a28f4e9b4887/dogsheep_beta/__init__.py#L223-L231 This made me think that `datasette.client.get()` (which Dogsheep Beta will start using shortly) could benefit from some kind of utility mechanism for passing through the cookies and general authenticated state from the current request. | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1020/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
724878151 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjQ4NzgxNTE= | 1032 | Bring date parsing into Datasette core | 9599 | open | 0 | 8 | 2020-10-19T18:30:45Z | 2020-10-19T19:37:55Z | OWNER | Currently this is mainly handled by a plugin - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-dateutil - but I realise now that this really needs to be core functionality. See also Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1318234808653213696 | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1032/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
724264574 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjQyNjQ1NzQ= | 52 | Option to fetch README and/or HTML-rendered README for repos | 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2020-10-19T05:10:24Z | 2020-10-19T05:33:42Z | 2020-10-19T05:33:42Z | MEMBER | I'm thinking: github-to-sqlite repos ... --readme # Populates readme column with raw text github-to-sqlite repos ... --readme-html # Populates readme_html column with raw HTML https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/contents/#get-a-repository-readme | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/52/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | ||||||
703218756 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MDMyMTg3NTY= | 50 | Commands for making authenticated API calls | 9599 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-09-17T02:39:07Z | 2020-10-19T05:01:29Z | MEMBER | Similar to `twitter-to-sqlite fetch`, see https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/51 | 207052882 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/50/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
709861194 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MDk4NjExOTQ= | 180 | Try running some tests using Hypothesis | 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2020-09-28T01:11:30Z | 2020-10-19T04:51:55Z | 2020-10-19T04:51:55Z | OWNER | Inspired by this Twitter conversation: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1310386009465479168 | 140912432 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/180/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed |