github
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
456569067 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTY1NjkwNjc= | 510 | Ability to facet by delimiter (e.g. comma separated fields) | 9599 | open | 0 | 9599 | 1 | 2019-06-15T19:34:41Z | 2019-07-08T15:44:51Z | OWNER | E.g. if a field contains "Tags,With,Commas" be able to facet them in the same way as `_facet_array=` lets you facet `["Tags", "With", "Commas"]` | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/510/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
462117311 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjIxMTczMTE= | 531 | /database/-/inspect | 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-06-28T16:33:41Z | 2019-07-08T15:43:57Z | OWNER | Build `/database/-/inspect` which shows tables, columns, column types and foreign keys It won't show table counts. Or maybe it will include them optionally but only for `-i` databases, in a special area of the JSON reserved for immutable-only inspect details. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/465#issuecomment-506797086_ | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/531/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
465003070 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMDMwNzA= | 551 | Ship many-to-many faceting support (and facet-by-delimiter) | 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-07-07T23:11:45Z | 2019-07-08T15:45:23Z | OWNER | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/551/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
465019882 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMTk4ODI= | 552 | Add --plugin-secret support to "datasette package" | 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-07-08T01:46:47Z | 2019-07-08T01:47:30Z | OWNER | Split out from #544. I think I should combine this with #347 (renaming `datasette package` to `datasette publish docker`). | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/552/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
465327844 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ= | 553 | Potential improvements to facet-by-date | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-07-08T15:37:53Z | 2019-07-08T15:41:55Z | OWNER | In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696 > I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful! Screenshot of that link: <img width="1092" alt="django_tickets__tickets__29_846_rows" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/60823090-9f680100-a15b-11e9-84e9-52b9d666e90f.png"> | 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |