github
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1534#issuecomment-1028461220 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1534 | 1028461220 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49TRKk | 9599 | 2022-02-02T23:39:33Z | 2022-02-02T23:39:33Z | OWNER | I've decided not to do this, because of the risk that Cloudflare could cache the JSON version for an HTML page or vice-versa. | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1065432388 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1534#issuecomment-1005975080 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1534 | 1005975080 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c479fYo | 9599 | 2022-01-05T18:29:06Z | 2022-01-05T18:29:06Z | OWNER | A really big downside to this is that it turns out many CDNs - apparently including Cloudflare - don't support the Vary header at all! More in this thread: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1478470282931163137 | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1065432388 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1534#issuecomment-1000535904 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1534 | 1000535904 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47ovdg | 9599 | 2021-12-23T21:44:31Z | 2021-12-23T21:44:31Z | OWNER | A big downside to this is that I would need to use `Vary: Accept` for when Datasette is running behind a cache such as Cloudflare - would that greatly reduce overall cache efficiency due to subtle variations in the accept headers sent by common browsers? | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1065432388 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1534#issuecomment-981149531 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1534 | 981149531 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c46eydb | 9599 | 2021-11-28T20:48:54Z | 2021-11-28T20:48:54Z | OWNER | If I'm going to do this, is there value in also spotting `Accept: text/csv` and returning CSV for that? I'm pretty sure no client has EVER implemented this though, so it feels like it would be showboating. | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1065432388 |