issue_comments
616 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
issue >30
- Database page loads too slowly with many large tables (due to table counts) 13
- Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 10
- docker image is duplicating db files somehow 10
- Handle spatialite geometry columns better 7
- base_url configuration setting 7
- Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 7
- create-index should run analyze after creating index 7
- Add new spatialite helper methods 7
- Add register_output_renderer hook 6
- Helper methods for working with SpatiaLite 6
- Plugin hook for dynamic metadata 6
- clean checkout & clean environment has test failures 6
- Upgrade to CodeMirror 6, add SQL autocomplete 6
- [WIP] Add publish to heroku support 5
- datasette publish lambda plugin 4
- Build Dockerfile with recent Sqlite + Spatialite 4
- Documentation with recommendations on running Datasette in production without using Docker 4
- bpylist.archiver.CircularReference: archive has a cycle with uid(13) 4
- Add insert --truncate option 4
- Make it easier to insert geometries, with documentation and maybe code 4
- Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism 4
- Proposal: datasette query 4
- Writable canned queries fail with useless non-error against immutable databases 4
- API to insert a single record into an existing table 4
- Ship a Docker image of the whole thing 3
- Support for units 3
- Don't duplicate simple primary keys in the link column 3
- Add version number support with Versioneer 3
- Integration with JupyterLab 3
- Datasette Library 3
- …
created_at (date) >30 ✖
- 2022-10-07 11
- 2019-04-29 9
- 2022-02-03 7
- 2018-05-22 6
- 2020-06-23 6
- 2020-07-01 6
- 2022-09-26 6
- 2022-09-27 6
- 2017-11-14 5
- 2019-05-03 5
- 2021-03-23 5
- 2022-01-08 5
- 2018-11-05 4
- 2019-06-22 4
- 2020-03-26 4
- 2020-05-10 4
- 2021-01-05 4
- 2021-09-08 4
- 2022-01-13 4
- 2022-03-24 4
- 2022-04-28 4
- 2022-11-14 4
- 2022-11-15 4
- 2017-11-16 3
- 2017-11-21 3
- 2018-04-14 3
- 2018-05-23 3
- 2018-07-14 3
- 2019-10-11 3
- 2020-07-08 3
- …
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1316256386 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893#issuecomment-1316256386 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1893 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OdHqC | bgrins 95570 | 2022-11-16T03:18:06Z | 2022-11-16T03:18:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
This version "sort of" works when on the main database page where the template passes the relevant data https://github.com/bgrins/datasette/commit/8431c98850c7a552dbcde2a4dd0c3dc942a97d25 by doing this and passing that into the ```
let TABLES_DATA = [];
{% if tables is defined %} // Turn into an object, shaped like https://github.com/codemirror/lang-sql/blob/ebf115fffdbe07f91465ccbd82868c587f8182bc/test/test-complete.ts#L27. const TABLES_SCHEMA = Object.fromEntries( new Map( TABLES_DATA.map((table) => { return [table.name, table.columns]; }) ).entries() ); ``` But there are a number of papercuts with it - it's not escaping table names with spaces (likely be fixable from the data being passed into the view) but mainly it doesn't seem to autocomplete columns. I think it might only want to do it when you first type the table name from my read of https://github.com/codemirror/lang-sql/blob/ebf115fffdbe07f91465ccbd82868c587f8182bc/test/test-complete.ts#L37. It's possible I'm just passing something wrong, but it may end up being something that needs feature work upstream. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to CodeMirror 6, add SQL autocomplete 1450363982 | |
1316243602 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893#issuecomment-1316243602 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1893 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OdEiS | bgrins 95570 | 2022-11-16T03:11:46Z | 2022-11-16T03:11:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Was just reviewing the SQL options and there's an upperCaseKeywords if we'd rather have SELECT vs select. Datasette seems to prefer lowercase so probably best to keep it as-is |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to CodeMirror 6, add SQL autocomplete 1450363982 | |
1316041828 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893#issuecomment-1316041828 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1893 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OcTRk | bgrins 95570 | 2022-11-15T23:51:35Z | 2022-11-15T23:51:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I experimented with autocompleting the actual schema in https://github.com/bgrins/datasette/commit/8431c98850c7a552dbcde2a4dd0c3dc942a97d25, but it would need some work (current problems with it listed in the commit message there) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to CodeMirror 6, add SQL autocomplete 1450363982 | |
1315869946 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893#issuecomment-1315869946 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1893 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5ObpT6 | bgrins 95570 | 2022-11-15T21:12:38Z | 2022-11-15T21:12:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | https://github.com/Sphinxxxx/cm-resize isn't compatible with 6. There's a suggestion to try using CSS resize in https://discuss.codemirror.net/t/resizing-codemirror-6/3265/2 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to CodeMirror 6, add SQL autocomplete 1450363982 | |
1315869040 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893#issuecomment-1315869040 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1893 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5ObpFw | bgrins 95570 | 2022-11-15T21:11:42Z | 2022-11-15T21:11:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | extraKeys is done - Shift+Enter is added in the helper function, and it appears that the Tab behavior now defaults to what the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to CodeMirror 6, add SQL autocomplete 1450363982 | |
1315853097 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1893#issuecomment-1315853097 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1893 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OblMp | bgrins 95570 | 2022-11-15T20:55:40Z | 2022-11-15T20:55:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Should also minify the bundled output |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upgrade to CodeMirror 6, add SQL autocomplete 1450363982 | |
1314241058 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1886#issuecomment-1314241058 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1886 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OVboi | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-11-14T19:06:35Z | 2022-11-14T19:06:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This probably counts as a case study: https://github.com/eyeseast/spatial-data-cooking-show. Even has video. Seriously, though, this workflow has become integral to my work with reporters and editors across USA TODAY Network. Very often, I get sent a folder of data in mixed formats, with a vague ask of how we should communicate some part of it to users. Datasette and its constellation of tools makes it easy to get a quick look at that data, run exploratory queries, map it and ask questions to figure out what's important to show. And then I export a version of the data that's exactly what I need for display. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Call for birthday presents: if you're using Datasette, let us know how you're using it here 1447050738 | |
1314066229 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1884#issuecomment-1314066229 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1884 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OUw81 | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-11-14T16:48:35Z | 2022-11-14T16:48:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm realizing I don't know if a virtual table will ever return a count. Maybe it depends on the implementation. For these three, just checking now, it'll always return zero. That said, I'm not sure there's any downside to having them return zero and caching that. (They're hidden, too.) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exclude virtual tables from datasette inspect 1439009231 | |
1313962183 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1884#issuecomment-1313962183 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1884 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OUXjH | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-11-14T15:46:32Z | 2022-11-14T15:46:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | It does work, though I think it's probably still worth excluding virtual tables that will always be zero. Here's the same inspection as before, now with
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exclude virtual tables from datasette inspect 1439009231 | |
1313252879 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1886#issuecomment-1313252879 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1886 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5ORqYP | adipasquale 883348 | 2022-11-14T08:10:23Z | 2022-11-14T08:10:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi @simonw and thanks for the great tools you're publishing, your dedication is inspiring! I work for the French Ministry of Culture on a surveying tool for objects protected for their historical value. It is part of a program building modern public services called beta.gouv.fr. In that context I'm using data published by the Ministry that I have ingested into datasette and published on a free Fly instance : https://collectif-objets-datasette.fly.dev . I have also ingested another data set with infos about french cities on this instance so that I can perform joined queries. The surveying tool synchronizes its data regularly from this datasette instance, and I also use it to perform queries when asked generic questions about the distribution of objects. (The data is not very accessible as it's undocumented and for internal usage mostly) |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 3, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Call for birthday presents: if you're using Datasette, let us know how you're using it here 1447050738 | |
1309735529 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1884#issuecomment-1309735529 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1884 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OEPpp | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-11-10T03:57:23Z | 2022-11-10T03:57:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Here's how to get a list of virtual tables: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46617118/how-to-fetch-names-of-virtual-tables |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exclude virtual tables from datasette inspect 1439009231 | |
1309650806 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1871#issuecomment-1309650806 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1871 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OD692 | davidbgk 3556 | 2022-11-10T01:38:58Z | 2022-11-10T01:38:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I agree (that's what I did with the previous insert plugin), maybe a complete example using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
API explorer tool 1427293909 | |
1304320521 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/511#issuecomment-1304320521 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/511 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5NvloJ | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-11-04T22:54:09Z | 2022-11-04T22:59:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I ran |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[insert_all, upsert_all] IntegrityError: constraint failed 1436539554 | |
1304078945 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/511#issuecomment-1304078945 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/511 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5Nuqph | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-11-04T19:38:36Z | 2022-11-04T20:13:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Even more bizarre, the source db only has one record and the target table has no conflicting record:
I've been able to use this code successfully several times before so not sure what's causing the issue. I guess the way that I'm handling multiple databases is an issue, though it hasn't ever inserted into the source db, not sure what's different. The only reasonable explanation is that it is trying to insert into the source db from the source db for some reason? Or maybe sqlite3 is checking the source db for primary key violation because the table name is the same |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[insert_all, upsert_all] IntegrityError: constraint failed 1436539554 | |
1303660293 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/50#issuecomment-1303660293 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/50 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5NtEcF | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-11-04T14:38:36Z | 2022-11-04T14:38:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | where did you see the limit as 999? I believe the limit has been 32766 for quite some time. If you could detect which one this could speed up batch insert of some types of data significantly |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
"Too many SQL variables" on large inserts 473083260 | |
1297859539 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/507#issuecomment-1297859539 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/507 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5NW8PT | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-11-01T00:40:16Z | 2022-11-01T00:40:16Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ideally people could fix their data if they run into this issue. If you are using filenames try convmv
maybe this script will also help: ```py import argparse, shutil from pathlib import Path import ftfy from xklb import utils from xklb.utils import log def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace: parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() parser.add_argument("paths", nargs='*') parser.add_argument("--verbose", "-v", action="count", default=0) args = parser.parse_args()
def rename_invalid_paths() -> None: args = parse_args()
if name == "main": rename_invalid_paths() ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
conn.execute: UnicodeEncodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't encode character 1430325103 | |
1297703307 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/448#issuecomment-1297703307 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/448 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5NWWGL | mcarpenter 167893 | 2022-10-31T21:23:51Z | 2022-10-31T21:27:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The Windows aspect is a red herring: OP's sample above produces the same error on Linux. (Though I don't know what's going on with the CI). The same error can also be obtained by passing an The fix for my case is easy: open the file in mode Minimal test case (derived from utils.py): ``` python import io from typing import cast fp = io.StringIO("id,name\n1,Cleo") # errorfp = io.BytesIO(bytes("id,name\n1,Cleo", encoding='utf-8')) # okay
reader = io.BufferedReader(cast(io.RawIOBase, fp))
reader.peek(1) # exception thrown here
Some thoughts on testing binary-ness of |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reading rows from a file => AttributeError: '_io.StringIO' object has no attribute 'readinto' 1279144769 | |
1296080804 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1872#issuecomment-1296080804 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1872 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NQJ-k | mroswell 192568 | 2022-10-30T03:06:32Z | 2022-10-30T03:06:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I updated datasette-publish-vercel to 0.14.2 in requirements.txt And the site is back up! Is there a way that we can get some sort of notice when something like this will have critical impact on website function? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
SITE-BUSTING ERROR: "render_template() called before await ds.invoke_startup()" 1428560020 | |
1296076803 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1872#issuecomment-1296076803 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1872 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NQJAD | mroswell 192568 | 2022-10-30T02:50:34Z | 2022-10-30T02:50:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | should this issue be under https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-vercel/issues ? Perhaps I just need to update: datasette-publish-vercel==0.11 in requirements.txt? I'll try that and see what happens... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
SITE-BUSTING ERROR: "render_template() called before await ds.invoke_startup()" 1428560020 | |
1295667649 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1870#issuecomment-1295667649 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1870 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NOlHB | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-29T00:52:43Z | 2022-10-29T00:53:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Somehow, I don't understand how that happens. it kind of feels like a bug in sqlite, but i can't quite follow the sqlite code. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
don't use immutable=1, only mode=ro 1426379903 | |
1294285471 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1870#issuecomment-1294285471 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1870 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NJTqf | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-28T01:06:03Z | 2022-10-28T01:06:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR | as far as i can tell, this is where the "immutable" argument is used in sqlite:
so it does set the read only flag, but then has a goto. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
don't use immutable=1, only mode=ro 1426379903 | |
1294237783 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1870#issuecomment-1294237783 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1870 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NJIBX | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-27T23:42:18Z | 2022-10-27T23:42:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Relevant sqlite forum thread: https://www.sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/02f7bda329f41e30451472421cf9ce7f715b768ce3db02797db1768e47950d48 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
don't use immutable=1, only mode=ro 1426379903 | |
1292592210 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1292592210 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NC2RS | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-10-26T20:03:46Z | 2022-10-26T20:03:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Yeah, every time I see something cool done with triggers, I remember that I need to start using triggers. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
API to insert a single record into an existing table 1421544654 | |
1292519956 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1292519956 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NCkoU | asg017 15178711 | 2022-10-26T19:20:33Z | 2022-10-26T19:20:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
@eyeseast Maybe you could do this with triggers? Like you can insert JSON-friendly data into a "raw" table, and create a trigger that transforms that inserted data into the proper table Here's an example: ```sql -- meant to be updated from a Datasette insert create table points_raw(longitude int, latitude int); -- the target table with proper spatliate geometries create table points(point geometry); CREATE TRIGGER insert_points_raw INSERT ON points_raw BEGIN insert into points(point) values (makepoint(new.longitude, new.latitude)) END; ``` You could then POST a new row to Then SQLite with run the trigger and insert a new row in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
API to insert a single record into an existing table 1421544654 | |
1292401308 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/499#issuecomment-1292401308 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/499 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5NCHqc | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-10-26T17:54:26Z | 2022-10-26T17:54:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The problem with how it is currently is that the transformed fts table will return incorrect results (unless the table was only 1 row or something), even if create_triggers was enabled previously. Maybe the simplest solution is to disable fts on a transformed table rather than try to recreate it? Thoughts? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
feat: recreate fts triggers after table transform 1405196044 | |
1291228502 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1291228502 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M9pVW | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-10-25T23:02:10Z | 2022-10-25T23:02:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That's reasonable. Canned queries and custom endpoints are certainly going to give more room for specific needs. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
API to insert a single record into an existing table 1421544654 | |
1290615599 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1851#issuecomment-1290615599 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1851 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5M7Tsv | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-10-25T14:05:12Z | 2022-10-25T14:05:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This could use a new plugin hook, too. I don't want to complicate your life too much, but for things like GIS, I'd want a way to turn regular JSON into SpatiaLite geometries or combine X/Y coordinates into point geometries and such. Happy to help however I can. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
API to insert a single record into an existing table 1421544654 | |
1274153135 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/498#issuecomment-1274153135 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/498 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5L8giv | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-10-11T06:34:31Z | 2022-10-11T06:34:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | nevermind it was because I was running |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix: enable-fts permanently save triggers 1404013495 | |
1272357976 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1272357976 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5L1qRY | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-08T16:56:51Z | 2022-10-08T16:56:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | when you are running from docker, you always will want to run as |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1271103097 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1271103097 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lw355 | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T04:43:41Z | 2022-10-07T04:43:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @simonw, should i open up a new issue for investigating the differences between "immutable=1" and "mode=ro" and possibly switching to "mode=ro". Or would you like to keep that conversation in this issue? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1271101072 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-1271101072 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lw3aQ | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T04:39:10Z | 2022-10-07T04:39:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | switching from |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
1271100651 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1271100651 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lw3Tr | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T04:38:14Z | 2022-10-07T04:38:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
this completely addressed #1480 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1271035998 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1301#issuecomment-1271035998 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1301 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lwnhe | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T02:38:04Z | 2022-10-07T02:38:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | the only mode that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Publishing to cloudrun with immutable mode? 860722711 | |
1271020193 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1271020193 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lwjqh | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T02:15:05Z | 2022-10-07T02:21:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | when i hack the connect method to open non mutable files with "mode=ro" and not "immutable=1" https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/eff112498ecc499323c26612d707908831446d25/datasette/database.py#L79 then:
the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1271008997 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1271008997 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lwg7l | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T02:00:37Z | 2022-10-07T02:00:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | yes, and i also think that this is causing the apparent memory problems in #1480. when the container starts up, it will make some operation on the database in running a test of that now. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1271003212 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1271003212 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LwfhM | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T01:52:04Z | 2022-10-07T01:52:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | and if we try immutable mode, which is how things are opened by ```python test_sql_immutable.pyimport sqlite3 import sys db_name = sys.argv[1] conn = sqlite3.connect(f'file:/app/{db_name}?immutable=1', uri=True) cur = conn.cursor() cur.execute('select count(*) from filing') print(cur.fetchone()) ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1270992795 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1270992795 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lwc-b | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T01:29:15Z | 2022-10-07T01:50:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | fascinatingly, telling python to open sqlite in read only mode makes this layer have a size of 0 ```python test_sql_ro.pyimport sqlite3 import sys db_name = sys.argv[1] conn = sqlite3.connect(f'file:/app/{db_name}?mode=ro', uri=True) cur = conn.cursor() cur.execute('select count(*) from filing') print(cur.fetchone()) ``` that's quite weird because setting the file permissions to read only didn't do anything. (on reflection, that chmod isn't doing anything because the dockerfile commands are run as root) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1270988081 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1270988081 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lwb0x | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T01:19:01Z | 2022-10-07T01:27:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | okay, some progress!! running some sql against a database file causes that file to get duplicated even if it doesn't apparently change the file. make a little test script like this: ```python test_sql.pyimport sqlite3 import sys db_name = sys.argv[1] conn = sqlite3.connect(f'file:/app/{db_name}', uri=True) cur = conn.cursor() cur.execute('select count(*) from filing') print(cur.fetchone()) ``` then
produced a layer that's the same size as |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1270936982 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1270936982 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LwPWW | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T00:52:41Z | 2022-10-07T00:52:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | it's not that the inspect command is somehow changing the db files. if i set them to only read-only, the "inspect" layer still has the same very large size. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1270923537 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1270923537 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LwMER | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-07T00:46:08Z | 2022-10-07T00:46:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i thought it was maybe to do with reading through all the files, but that does not seem to be the case if i make a little test file like: ```python test_read.pyimport hashlib import sys import pathlib HASH_BLOCK_SIZE = 1024 * 1024 def inspect_hash(path): """Calculate the hash of a database, efficiently.""" m = hashlib.sha256() with path.open("rb") as fp: while True: data = fp.read(HASH_BLOCK_SIZE) if not data: break m.update(data)
inspect_hash(pathlib.Path(sys.argv[1])) ``` then a line in the Dockerfile like
just produes a layer of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
docker image is duplicating db files somehow 1400374908 | |
1269847461 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-1269847461 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LsFWl | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-06T11:21:49Z | 2022-10-06T11:21:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | thanks @simonw, i'll spend a little more time trying to figure out why this isn't working on cloudrun, and then will flip over to fly if i can't. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
1268629159 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-1268629159 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lnb6n | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-05T16:00:55Z | 2022-10-05T16:00:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | as a next step, i'll fetch the docker image from the google registry, and see what memory and disk usage looks like when i run it locally. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
1268613335 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-1268613335 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LnYDX | fgregg 536941 | 2022-10-05T15:45:49Z | 2022-10-05T15:45:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | running into this as i continue to grow my labor data warehouse. Here a CloudRun PM says the container size should not count against memory: https://stackoverflow.com/a/56570717 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database 1015646369 | |
1264223554 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/409#issuecomment-1264223554 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/409 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LWoVC | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-10-01T03:42:50Z | 2022-10-01T03:42:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | oh weird. it inserts into db2 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`with db:` for transactions 1149661489 | |
1264223363 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/409#issuecomment-1264223363 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/409 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LWoSD | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-10-01T03:41:45Z | 2022-10-01T03:41:45Z | CONTRIBUTOR | ``` pytest xklb/check.py --pdb xklb/check.py:11: in test_transaction assert list(db2["t"].rows) == [] E AssertionError: assert [{'foo': 1}] == [] E + where [{'foo': 1}] = list(<generator object Queryable.rows_where at 0x7f2d84d1f0d0>) E + where <generator object Queryable.rows_where at 0x7f2d84d1f0d0> = <Table t (foo)>.rows
It fails because it is already inserted. btw if you put these two lines in you pyproject.toml you can get
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`with db:` for transactions 1149661489 | |
1264219650 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/493#issuecomment-1264219650 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/493 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LWnYC | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-10-01T03:22:50Z | 2022-10-01T03:23:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | this is likely what you are looking for: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51076749/697964 but yeah I would say just disable smart quotes |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Tiny typographical error in install/uninstall docs 1386562662 | |
1261930179 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/370#issuecomment-1261930179 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/370 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LN4bD | MichaelTiemannOSC 72577720 | 2022-09-29T08:17:46Z | 2022-09-29T08:17:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Just watched this video which demonstrates the integration of any webapp into JupyterLab: https://youtu.be/FH1dKKmvFtc Maybe this is the answer? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Integration with JupyterLab 377155320 | |
1260909128 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1062#issuecomment-1260909128 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1062 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LJ_JI | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-28T13:22:53Z | 2022-09-28T14:09:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | if you went this route:
then i wonder if this was why you were thinking this feature would need a dedicated connection? reading more, there's no real limit i can find on the number of active cursors (or more precisely active prepared statements objects, because sqlite doesn't really have cursors). maybe something like this would be okay?
this seems quite weird that there's not more of limit of the number of active prepared statements, but i haven't been able to find one. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor .csv to be an output renderer - and teach register_output_renderer to stream all rows 732674148 | |
1260829829 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1062#issuecomment-1260829829 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1062 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LJryF | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-28T12:27:19Z | 2022-09-28T12:27:19Z | CONTRIBUTOR | for teaching
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Refactor .csv to be an output renderer - and teach register_output_renderer to stream all rows 732674148 | |
1259718517 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1259718517 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LFcd1 | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-27T16:02:51Z | 2022-09-27T16:04:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i think that if you are potentially yielding out hundreds of thousands or even millions of rows, you need to be quite careful about data flow to not run out of memory on the server, or on the client. you have a lot of places in your code that are protective of that right now, but so, given that, it makes sense to have removing that could dramatically lower the surface area for a memory-bomb attack. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1258910228 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1258910228 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LCXIU | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-27T03:11:07Z | 2022-09-27T03:11:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i think this feature would be safe, as its really only the time limit that can, and imo, should protect against long running queries, as it is pretty easy to make very expensive queries that don't return many rows. moving away from
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1258878311 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1258878311 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LCPVn | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-27T02:19:48Z | 2022-09-27T02:19:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR | this sql query doesn't trip up
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1258871525 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1258871525 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LCNrl | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-27T02:09:32Z | 2022-09-27T02:14:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | thanks @simonw, i learned something i didn't know about sqlite's execution model!
why wouldn't the on my local version which has the code to turn off truncations for query csv, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1258849766 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1258849766 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LCIXm | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-27T01:27:03Z | 2022-09-27T01:27:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i agree with that concern! but if i'm understanding the code correctly, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1258803261 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1820#issuecomment-1258803261 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1820 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LB9A9 | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-27T00:03:09Z | 2022-09-27T00:03:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | the pattern in this PR i think it would be better to have each of these different query renderers have more direct control for how many rows to fetch, instead of relying on the internals of the generally, users will not want to paginate through tens of thousands of results, but often will want to download a full query as json or as csv. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[SPIKE] Don't truncate query CSVs 1386456717 | |
1258712931 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491#issuecomment-1258712931 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LBm9j | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-09-26T22:31:58Z | 2022-09-26T22:31:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Right. The backup command will copy tables completely, but in the case of conflicting table names, the destination gets overwritten silently. That might not be what you want here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to merge databases and tables 1383646615 | |
1258508215 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491#issuecomment-1258508215 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5LA0-3 | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-09-26T19:22:14Z | 2022-09-26T19:22:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This might be fairly straightforward using SQLite's backup utility: https://docs.python.org/3/library/sqlite3.html#sqlite3.Connection.backup |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to merge databases and tables 1383646615 | |
1258337011 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1258337011 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LALLz | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-26T16:49:48Z | 2022-09-26T16:49:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i think the smallest change that gets close to what i want is to change the behavior so that there are some infelicities for that approach, but i'll make a PR to make it easier to discuss. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1258167564 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1258167564 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K_h0M | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-26T14:57:44Z | 2022-09-26T15:08:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | reading the database execute method i have a few questions. unless i'm missing something (which is very likely!!), the It's not like adding a Instead the code executes the full original query, and if still has time it fetches out the first this does offer some protection of memory exhaustion, as you won't hydrate a huge result set into python (however, there are data flow patterns that could avoid that too) given the current architecture, i don't see how creating a new connection would be use? If we just removed the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1258166572 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1655#issuecomment-1258166572 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1655 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K_hks | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-26T14:57:04Z | 2022-09-26T14:57:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think that paginating, even in javascript, could be very helpful. Maybe render json or csv into the page and let javascript loading that into the dom? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
query result page is using 400mb of browser memory 40x size of html page and 400x size of csv data 1163369515 | |
1258129113 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1727#issuecomment-1258129113 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1727 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K_YbZ | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-26T14:30:11Z | 2022-09-26T14:48:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | from your analysis, it seems like the GIL is blocking on loading of the data from sqlite to python, (particularly in the this is probably a simplistic idea, but what if you had the python code in the something like: this kind of thing works well with a postgres server side cursor, but i'm not sure if it will hold for sqlite. you would still spend about the same amount of time in python and would be contending for the gil, but it would be could be non blocking. depending on the data flow, this could also some benefit for memory. (data stays in more compact sqlite-land until you need it) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Research: demonstrate if parallel SQL queries are worthwhile 1217759117 | |
1256858763 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491#issuecomment-1256858763 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/491 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5K6iSL | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-09-24T04:50:59Z | 2022-09-24T04:52:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Instead of outputting binary data to stdout the interface might be better like this
similar to Actually I think this might already be possible within
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to merge databases and tables 1383646615 | |
1256781274 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1817 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K6PXa | jefftriplett 50527 | 2022-09-23T22:59:46Z | 2022-09-23T22:59:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive? Thinking out loud:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Expose `sql` and `params` arguments to various plugin hooks 1384273985 | |
1254064260 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1254064260 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Kv4CE | fgregg 536941 | 2022-09-21T18:17:04Z | 2022-09-21T18:18:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | hi @simonw, this is becoming more of a bother for my labor data warehouse. Is there any research or a spike i could do that would help you investigate this issue? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Stream all results for arbitrary SQL and canned queries 459882902 | |
1252898131 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/433#issuecomment-1252898131 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/433 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5KrbVT | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-09-20T20:51:21Z | 2022-09-20T20:56:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | When I run https://linux.die.net/man/1/reset
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CLI eats my cursor 1239034903 | |
1250901367 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1813#issuecomment-1250901367 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1813 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Kjz13 | adipasquale 883348 | 2022-09-19T11:34:45Z | 2022-09-19T11:34:45Z | CONTRIBUTOR | oh and by writing this I just realized the difference: the URL on fly.io is with a custom SQL command whereas the local one is without. It seems that there is no pagination when using custom SQL commands which makes sense Sorry for this useless issue, maybe this can be useful for someone else / me in the future. Thanks again for this wonderful project ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
missing next and next_url in JSON responses from an instance deployed on Fly 1377811868 | |
1248204219 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1810#issuecomment-1248204219 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1810 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5KZhW7 | psychemedia 82988 | 2022-09-15T14:44:47Z | 2022-09-15T14:46:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | A couple+ of possible use case examples:
In many cases, I suspect the raw content will be in one table, but the search table will be a second (eg FTS) table. Generally, the search may be over one or more joined tables, and the results constructed from one or more tables (which may or may not be distinct from the search tables). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Featured table(s) on the homepage 1374626873 | |
1237381620 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1685#issuecomment-1237381620 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1685 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5JwPH0 | dependabot[bot] 49699333 | 2022-09-05T18:36:47Z | 2022-09-05T18:36:47Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Looks like jinja2 is no longer updatable, so this is no longer needed. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update jinja2 requirement from <3.1.0,>=2.10.3 to >=2.10.3,<3.2.0 1180778860 | |
1237381569 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1799#issuecomment-1237381569 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1799 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5JwPHB | dependabot[bot] 49699333 | 2022-09-05T18:36:42Z | 2022-09-05T18:36:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Looks like aiofiles is no longer updatable, so this is no longer needed. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update aiofiles requirement from <0.9,>=0.4 to >=0.4,<22.2 1362242558 | |
1232356302 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/480#issuecomment-1232356302 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/480 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5JdEPO | chapmanjacobd 7908073 | 2022-08-31T01:51:49Z | 2022-08-31T01:51:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for pointing me to the right place |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
search_sql add include_rank option 1355433619 | |
1224382336 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/467#issuecomment-1224382336 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/467 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5I-peA | jefftriplett 50527 | 2022-08-23T17:16:13Z | 2022-08-23T17:16:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I would lean towards not dropping them (or making a I do like that sqlite-utils mostly just works with existing tables but it's also nice to add to existing fields in a few cases. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for ensuring a table has all the columns 1348169997 | |
1223347322 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1789#issuecomment-1223347322 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1789 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5I6sx6 | asg017 15178711 | 2022-08-23T00:03:20Z | 2022-08-23T00:03:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @simonw to build the extension on ubuntu, you can run:
I'm not the best with Actions, but if you set the cache key to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add new entrypoint option to `--load-extension` 1344823170 | |
1221576460 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1789#issuecomment-1221576460 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1789 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Iz8cM | asg017 15178711 | 2022-08-21T16:16:42Z | 2022-08-21T16:16:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Rebased, Read the docs failure should now now fixed Re docs - ya that's a pretty ambitious page, I'm still not 100% sure what the best practices are/should be... Would be happy to make that page in a future PR |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add new entrypoint option to `--load-extension` 1344823170 | |
1214437408 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1214437408 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IYtgg | fgregg 536941 | 2022-08-14T19:42:58Z | 2022-08-14T19:42:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | thanks @simonw! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1210675046 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1779#issuecomment-1210675046 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1779 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5IKW9m | fgregg 536941 | 2022-08-10T13:28:37Z | 2022-08-10T13:28:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | maybe a simpler solution is to set the maxscale to like 2? since datasette is not set up to make use of container scaling anyway? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
google cloudrun updated their limits on maxscale based on memory and cpu count 1334628400 | |
1200732975 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1191#issuecomment-1200732975 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1191 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Hkbsv | brandonrobertz 2670795 | 2022-08-01T05:39:27Z | 2022-08-01T05:39:27Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've got a URL shortening plugin that I would like to embed on the query page but I'd like avoid capturing the entire |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability for plugins to collaborate when adding extra HTML to blocks in default templates 787098345 | |
1190277829 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/456#issuecomment-1190277829 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/456 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5G8jLF | fgregg 536941 | 2022-07-20T13:19:15Z | 2022-07-20T13:19:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | hadley wickham's melt and reshape could be good inspo: http://had.co.nz/reshape/introduction.pdf |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
feature request: pivot command 1310243385 | |
1190272780 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/456#issuecomment-1190272780 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/456 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5G8h8M | fgregg 536941 | 2022-07-20T13:14:54Z | 2022-07-20T13:14:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | for example, i have data on votes that look like this: | ballot_id | option_id | choice | |-|-|-| | 1 | 1 | 0 | | 1 | 2 | 1 | | 1 | 3 | 0 | | 1 | 4 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 2 | 0 | | 2 | 3 | 1 | | 2 | 4 | 0 | and i want to reshape from this long form to this wide form: | ballot_id | option_id_1 | option_id_2 | option_id_3 | option_id_ 4| |-|-|-|-| -| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1| 0 | i could do such a think like this.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
feature request: pivot command 1310243385 | |
1189010812 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/423#issuecomment-1189010812 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/423 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5G3t18 | fgregg 536941 | 2022-07-19T12:47:39Z | 2022-07-19T12:47:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | just ran into this! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
.extract() doesn't set foreign key when extracted columns contain NULL value 1199158210 | |
1179579878 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/449#issuecomment-1179579878 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/449 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5GTvXm | davidleejy 1690072 | 2022-07-09T17:41:32Z | 2022-07-09T17:41:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Learnt that the types in Sqlite-utils differ somewhat from those in Sqlite. I've changed my test to account for this difference and the test has passed successfully. I will submit a PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Utilities for duplicating tables and creating a table with the results of a query 1279863844 | |
1174027079 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/449#issuecomment-1174027079 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/449 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5F-jtH | davidleejy 1690072 | 2022-07-04T17:33:04Z | 2022-07-04T17:48:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've written the code and test. Would you be able to advise how to compare table columns in a pytest function properly? Experiencing a challenge when comparing columns. Test:
Result: Failure is due to column types being named differently -- e.g. 'FLOAT' vs 'REAL', 'INTEGER' vs 'INT'. How should I go about comparing columns while accounting for equivalent types? Or did I miss out something in my duplication code correctly? Here's how I did it: in
``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Utilities for duplicating tables and creating a table with the results of a query 1279863844 | |
1173358747 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1713#issuecomment-1173358747 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1713 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5F8Aib | brandonrobertz 2670795 | 2022-07-04T05:16:35Z | 2022-07-04T05:16:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This feature is pretty important and would be nice if it would be all within Datasette (no separate CLI/deploy required). My workflow now is to basically just copy the result and paste into a Google Sheet, which works, but then it's not discoverable to other journalists browsing the Datasette instance. I started building a plugin similar to datasette-saved-queries but one that maintains its own DB (required if you're working with all immutable DBs), but got bogged down in details. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Datasette feature for publishing snapshots of query results 1203943272 | |
1168704157 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1693#issuecomment-1168704157 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1693 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5FqQKd | dependabot[bot] 49699333 | 2022-06-28T13:11:36Z | 2022-06-28T13:11:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Superseded by #1763. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Bump black from 22.1.0 to 22.3.0 1184850337 | |
1163091750 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1753#issuecomment-1163091750 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1753 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5FU18m | dependabot[bot] 49699333 | 2022-06-22T13:22:34Z | 2022-06-22T13:22:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Superseded by #1760. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Bump furo from 2022.4.7 to 2022.6.4.1 1261826957 | |
1151887842 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1528#issuecomment-1151887842 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1528 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5EqGni | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-06-10T03:23:08Z | 2022-06-10T03:23:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I just put together a version of this in a plugin: https://github.com/eyeseast/datasette-query-files. Happy to have any feedback. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add new `"sql_file"` key to Canned Queries in metadata? 1060631257 | |
1128064864 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1742#issuecomment-1128064864 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1742 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5DPOdg | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-05-16T19:42:13Z | 2022-05-16T19:42:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Just to add a wrinkle here, this loads fine: https://alltheplaces-datasette.fly.dev/alltheplaces/places.geojson?_trace=1 But also, this doesn't add any trace data: https://alltheplaces-datasette.fly.dev/alltheplaces/places.json?_trace=1 What am I missing? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
?_trace=1 fails with datasette-geojson for some reason 1237586379 | |
1128049716 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1742#issuecomment-1128049716 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1742 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5DPKw0 | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-05-16T19:24:44Z | 2022-05-16T19:24:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Where is |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
?_trace=1 fails with datasette-geojson for some reason 1237586379 | |
1125342229 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/741#issuecomment-1125342229 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/741 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5DE1wV | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-05-12T19:21:16Z | 2022-05-12T19:21:16Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Came here to check if this had been flagged already. Was helping a colleague get something on Cloud Run and had to dig to find If I get some time next week, maybe I'll try to tackle it. Would definitely make things easier to be able to do something like this:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Replace "datasette publish --extra-options" with "--setting" 607223136 | |
1111752676 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1728#issuecomment-1111752676 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1728 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CQ__k | wragge 127565 | 2022-04-28T05:11:54Z | 2022-04-28T05:11:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | And in terms of the bug, yep I agree that option 2 would be the most useful and least frustrating. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Writable canned queries fail with useless non-error against immutable databases 1218133366 | |
1111751734 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1728#issuecomment-1111751734 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1728 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CQ_w2 | wragge 127565 | 2022-04-28T05:09:59Z | 2022-04-28T05:09:59Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks, I'll give it a try! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Writable canned queries fail with useless non-error against immutable databases 1218133366 | |
1111712953 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1728#issuecomment-1111712953 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1728 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CQ2S5 | wragge 127565 | 2022-04-28T03:48:36Z | 2022-04-28T03:48:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I don't think that'd work for this project. The db is very big, and my aim was to have an environment where researchers could be making use of the data, but be easily able to add corrections to the HTR/OCR extracted data when they came across problems. It's in its immutable (!) form here: https://sydney-stock-exchange-xqtkxtd5za-ts.a.run.app/stock_exchange/stocks |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Writable canned queries fail with useless non-error against immutable databases 1218133366 | |
1111705323 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1728#issuecomment-1111705323 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1728 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5CQ0br | wragge 127565 | 2022-04-28T03:32:06Z | 2022-04-28T03:32:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ah, that would be it! I have a core set of data which doesn't change to which I want authorised users to be able to submit corrections. I was going to deal with the persistence issue by just grabbing the user corrections at regular intervals and saving to GitHub. I might need to rethink. Thanks! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Writable canned queries fail with useless non-error against immutable databases 1218133366 | |
1105642187 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-1105642187 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1101 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5B5sLL | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-21T18:59:08Z | 2022-04-21T18:59:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ha! That was your idea (and a good one). But it's probably worth measuring to see what overhead it adds. It did require both passing in the database and making the whole thing Just timing the queries themselves:
Looking at the network panel:
I'm not sure how best to time the GeoJSON generation, but it would be interesting to check. Maybe I'll write a plugin to add query times to response headers. The other thing to consider with async streaming is that it might be well-suited for a slower response. When I have to get the whole result and send a response in a fixed amount of time, I need the most efficient query possible. If I can hang onto a connection and get things one chunk at a time, maybe it's ok if there's some overhead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
register_output_renderer() should support streaming data 749283032 | |
1105588651 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-1105588651 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1101 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5B5fGr | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-21T18:15:39Z | 2022-04-21T18:15:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | What if you split rendering and streaming into two things:
That way current plugins still work, and streaming is purely additive. A |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
register_output_renderer() should support streaming data 749283032 | |
1103312860 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1713#issuecomment-1103312860 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1713 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Bwzfc | fgregg 536941 | 2022-04-20T00:52:19Z | 2022-04-20T00:52:19Z | CONTRIBUTOR | feels related to #1402 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Datasette feature for publishing snapshots of query results 1203943272 | |
1099540225 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1713#issuecomment-1099540225 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1713 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BiacB | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-14T19:09:57Z | 2022-04-14T19:09:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I wonder if this overlaps with what I outlined in #1605. You could run something like this:
And maybe that does what you need. Of course, that plugin isn't built yet. But that's the idea. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Datasette feature for publishing snapshots of query results 1203943272 | |
1094453751 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1094453751 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BPAn3 | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-11T01:32:12Z | 2022-04-11T01:32:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Was looking through old issues and realized a bunch of this got discussed in #1101 (including by me!), so sorry to rehash all this. Happy to help with whatever piece of it I can. Would be very excited to be able to use format plugins with exports. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1092386254 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092386254 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHH3O | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T02:39:25Z | 2022-04-08T02:39:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | And just to think this through a little more, here's what
Alternately, that could be an async generator, like this:
Not sure which makes more sense, but I think this pattern would open up a lot of possibility. If you had your stream_indented_json function, you could do |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1092370880 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092370880 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHEHA | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T02:07:40Z | 2022-04-08T02:07:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So maybe
And stream gets an iterator, instead of a list of rows, so it can efficiently handle large queries. Maybe it also gets passed a destination stream, or it returns an iterator. I'm not sure what makes more sense. Either way, that might cover both CLI exports and streaming responses. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
1092357672 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092357672 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHA4o | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T01:39:40Z | 2022-04-08T01:39:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
That's my thinking, too. It's really the thing I've been wanting since writing
I think this probably needs either a new plugin hook separate from |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user >30