issue_comments
14 rows where author_association = "OWNER", "created_at" is on date 2022-02-07 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- simonw · 14 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1032057472 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032057472 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g_KA | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:50:01Z | 2022-02-07T23:50:01Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | ||
1032050489 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032050489 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g9c5 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:39:11Z | 2022-02-07T23:42:08Z | OWNER | That implementation broke on Python 3.6 - which is still a supported Python version for the 0.60.x branch - ```
I could say that I'm going to use a different idiom for order-preserving de-duplication from this StackOverflow instead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032037391 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032037391 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g6QP | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:21:07Z | 2022-02-07T23:21:07Z | OWNER | For the record, here's the code that picks the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032036525 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032036525 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g6Ct | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:19:59Z | 2022-02-07T23:19:59Z | OWNER | I'm going to fix this in the CLI code itself, rather than fixing it in the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032034015 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032034015 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g5bf | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:17:57Z | 2022-02-07T23:17:57Z | OWNER | I'm going to fix this in a 0.60.2 bug fix release. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1032032686 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1632#issuecomment-1032032686 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49g5Gu | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T23:16:10Z | 2022-02-07T23:16:10Z | OWNER | I found this bug while trying to get the following to work:
I want this to create any missing database files on startup out of that literal list of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 1126604194 | |
1031787865 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402#issuecomment-1031787865 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/402 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49f9VZ | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T18:33:27Z | 2022-02-07T18:33:27Z | OWNER | Hah, that's interesting - I've never used that mechanism before so it wasn't something that came to mind. They seem to be using a pretty surprising trick there that takes advantage of SQLite allowing you to define a column "type" using a made-up type name, which you can then introspect later. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced class-based `conversions=` mechanism 1125297737 | |
1031141849 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1031141849 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49dfnZ | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T07:11:11Z | 2022-02-07T07:11:11Z | OWNER | I added a Link header to solve this problem for the JSON version in: - #1533 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1031126801 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-1031126801 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49db8R | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T06:43:31Z | 2022-02-07T06:43:31Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | ||
1031126547 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-1031126547 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49db4T | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T06:42:58Z | 2022-02-07T06:42:58Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | ||
1031125347 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-1031125347 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49dblj | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T06:40:16Z | 2022-02-07T06:40:16Z | OWNER | Read The Docs error:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | |
1031123719 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-1031123719 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49dbMH | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T06:36:32Z | 2022-02-07T06:36:32Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/main/.readthedocs.yaml looks like this (it works correctly): ```yaml version: 2 sphinx: configuration: docs/conf.py python: version: "3.8" install: - method: pip path: . extra_requirements: - docs ``` Compare to the current Datasette one here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/d9b508ffaa91f9f1840b366f5d282712d445f16b/.readthedocs.yaml#L1-L13 Looks like I need this bit:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | |
1031122800 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-1031122800 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49da9w | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T06:34:21Z | 2022-02-07T06:34:21Z | OWNER | New section is here: https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/internals.html#the-datasette-utils-module But it's not correctly displaying the new autodoc stuff: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | |
1031108559 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-1031108559 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49dXfP | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T06:11:27Z | 2022-02-07T06:11:27Z | OWNER | I'm going with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4