issue_comments

Table actions

7 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and issue = 1078702875 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) · 7 ✖

author_association 1

  • OWNER · 7 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
996084899 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996084899 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xwyj simonw 9599 2021-12-16T18:48:14Z 2021-12-16T18:48:14Z OWNER 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  
996077053 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996077053 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xu39 simonw 9599 2021-12-16T18:36:41Z 2021-12-16T18:36:41Z OWNER

... actually no, I WILL document this, because not documenting this is what got us to this point in the first place!

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 1,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  
996076373 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996076373 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XutV simonw 9599 2021-12-16T18:35:40Z 2021-12-16T18:35:40Z OWNER

I'm going to ship your fix now, but I'm not going to add this to the documentation yet because I hope to improve the design prior to Datasette 1.0.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  
996046304 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996046304 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnXg simonw 9599 2021-12-16T17:53:40Z 2021-12-16T18:16:12Z OWNER

I'm also not convinced that this configuration syntax is right. It's a bit weird having a "facets" list that can either by column-name-strings or {"type-of-facet": "column-name"} objects. Maybe there's a better design for this?

Part of the problem here is that facets were designed to accept optional extra configuration - partly to support m2m facets in #495 - but I haven't actually shipped any facets that use that ability.

Facet by delimiter would be a good one to exercise that ability: - #510

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  
996045776 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996045776 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnPQ simonw 9599 2021-12-16T17:52:54Z 2021-12-16T17:52:54Z OWNER

I tried that fix you suggested and now this metadata.json does the right thing: json { "databases": { "fixtures": { "tables": { "facetable": { "facets": [ { "array": "tags" } ] } } } } } It does further highlight the bug in #625 though - since then if you try to add ?_facet=tags to facet by tags treating them NOT as an array your request to do so is ignored.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  
996034408 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996034408 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47Xkdo simonw 9599 2021-12-16T17:37:37Z 2021-12-16T17:37:37Z OWNER

I think you're right! I had completely forgotten that piece of code.

This just turned into a bug fix and a documentation update. Thanks for the research!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  
995034143 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-995034143 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 IC_kwDOBm6k_c47TwQf simonw 9599 2021-12-15T18:02:53Z 2021-12-15T18:02:53Z OWNER

This is definitely a missing feature. The "different types of facet" stuff feels incomplete to me generally - this is one issue, but this one as well:

  • 625

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Allow to set `facets_array` in metadata (like current `facets`) 1078702875  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);