issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 1121121305 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string "pragma" · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1027659018 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1618#issuecomment-1027659018 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1618 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49QNUK | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-02T07:32:47Z | 2022-02-02T07:32:47Z | OWNER | I was hoping that
``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string "pragma" 1121121305 | |
1027656518 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1618#issuecomment-1027656518 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1618 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49QMtG | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-02T07:28:14Z | 2022-02-02T07:31:30Z | OWNER | I also need to consider if supposedly harmless side-effect free pragma functions could be used to work around the Datasette permissions system. My hunch is that wouldn't be a problem, because if you're allowing arbitrary SQL queries you're already letting people ignore the permissions system. One example: ``` sqlite-utils fixtures.db 'pragma database_list' -t seq name file
``` Though it looks like I already allow-listed that one in #761: https://latest.datasette.io/_memory?sql=select+*+from+pragma_database_list%28%29 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string "pragma" 1121121305 | |
1027656000 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1618#issuecomment-1027656000 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1618 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49QMlA | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-02T07:27:14Z | 2022-02-02T07:27:14Z | OWNER | I also just realized that
| name | |---------------------------| | analysis_limit | | application_id | | auto_vacuum | | automatic_index | | busy_timeout | | cache_size | | cache_spill | | case_sensitive_like | | cell_size_check | | checkpoint_fullfsync | | collation_list | | compile_options | | count_changes | | data_version | | database_list | | default_cache_size | | defer_foreign_keys | | empty_result_callbacks | | encoding | | foreign_key_check | | foreign_key_list | | foreign_keys | | freelist_count | | full_column_names | | fullfsync | | function_list | | hard_heap_limit | | ignore_check_constraints | | incremental_vacuum | | index_info | | index_list | | index_xinfo | | integrity_check | | journal_mode | | journal_size_limit | | legacy_alter_table | | lock_proxy_file | | locking_mode | | max_page_count | | mmap_size | | module_list | | optimize | | page_count | | page_size | | pragma_list | | query_only | | quick_check | | read_uncommitted | | recursive_triggers | | reverse_unordered_selects | | schema_version | | secure_delete | | short_column_names | | shrink_memory | | soft_heap_limit | | synchronous | | table_info | | table_list | | table_xinfo | | temp_store | | temp_store_directory | | threads | | trusted_schema | | user_version | | wal_autocheckpoint | | wal_checkpoint | | writable_schema | So I could use that list to create a much more specific regular expression, which would then allow the word "pragma" to be used more freely while still protecting against any known pragma function being called. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string "pragma" 1121121305 | |
1027654979 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1618#issuecomment-1027654979 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1618 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49QMVD | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-02T07:25:22Z | 2022-02-02T07:25:22Z | OWNER | But... I just noticed something I had missed in the docs for https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragfunc
So it's possible I'm being overly paranoid here after all: what I want to block here is people running things like So maybe I should allow all pragma functions. I previously allowed an allow-list of them in: - #761 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string "pragma" 1121121305 | |
1027653005 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1618#issuecomment-1027653005 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1618 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49QL2N | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-02T07:22:13Z | 2022-02-02T07:22:13Z | OWNER | There's a workaround for this at the moment, which is to use parameterized SQL queries. For example, this: So the SQL query is The reason behind the quite aggressive pragma filtering is that SQLite allows you to execute pragmas using function calls, like this one:
I'm open to relaxing the regex a bit, but I need to be very confident that it's safe to do so. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string "pragma" 1121121305 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1