issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "OWNER", issue = 309047460 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Ability to bundle metadata and templates inside the SQLite file · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 738905376 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/188#issuecomment-738905376 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/188 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczODkwNTM3Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-04T17:18:34Z | 2020-12-04T17:18:34Z | OWNER | This is likely to be covered by plugin hooks: #860 for the metadata and after investigating in #1042 it looks like the existing |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Ability to bundle metadata and templates inside the SQLite file 309047460 | |
| 412291327 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/188#issuecomment-412291327 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/188 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxMjI5MTMyNw== | simonw 9599 | 2018-08-11T17:53:17Z | 2018-08-11T17:53:17Z | OWNER | Potential problem: the existing
This doesn't make sense for metadata that is bundled with a specific database - there's no point in having the Calling such an embedded file |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Ability to bundle metadata and templates inside the SQLite file 309047460 | |
| 376594727 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/188#issuecomment-376594727 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/188 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NjU5NDcyNw== | simonw 9599 | 2018-03-27T16:46:49Z | 2018-05-28T21:34:34Z | OWNER | One point of complexity: datasette can be used to bundle multiple .db files into a single "app". I think that's OK. We could require that the That said... any configuration that corresponds to a specific table should live in the same database file as that table. Ditto for general metadata: if we have license/source information for a specific table or database that information should be able to live in the same .db file as the data. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Ability to bundle metadata and templates inside the SQLite file 309047460 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1