issue_comments
38 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and "updated_at" is on date 2020-12-30 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date)
user 1
- simonw 38
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
752780000 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1165#issuecomment-752780000 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1165 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc4MDAwMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T22:41:25Z | 2020-12-30T22:41:25Z | OWNER | Jest works with Puppeteer: https://jestjs.io/docs/en/puppeteer |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for executing JavaScript unit tests 776635426 | |
752779820 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1165#issuecomment-752779820 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1165 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc3OTgyMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T22:40:28Z | 2020-12-30T22:40:28Z | OWNER | I don't know if Jest on the command-line is the right tool for this. It works for the So maybe I should just find a browser testing solution and figure out how to run that under CI in GitHub Actions. Maybe https://www.cypress.io/ ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for executing JavaScript unit tests 776635426 | |
752779490 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1165#issuecomment-752779490 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1165 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc3OTQ5MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T22:38:43Z | 2020-12-30T22:38:43Z | OWNER | Turned that into a TIL: https://til.simonwillison.net/javascript/jest-without-package-json |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for executing JavaScript unit tests 776635426 | |
752777744 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1165#issuecomment-752777744 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1165 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc3Nzc0NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T22:30:24Z | 2020-12-30T22:30:24Z | OWNER | https://www.valentinog.com/blog/jest/ was useful. I created a ```javascript const datasette = require("../plugins.js"); describe("Datasette Plugins", () => { test("it should have datasette.plugins", () => { expect(!!datasette.plugins).toEqual(true); }); test("registering a plugin should work", () => { datasette.plugins.register("numbers", (a, b) => a + b, ["a", "b"]); var result = datasette.plugins.call("numbers", { a: 1, b: 2 }); expect(result).toEqual([3]); datasette.plugins.register("numbers", (a, b) => a * b, ["a", "b"]); var result2 = datasette.plugins.call("numbers", { a: 1, b: 2 }); expect(result2).toEqual([3, 2]); }); }); ``` In module.exports = datasette;
Then inside ``` % npx jest -c '{}' PASS tests/plugins.spec.js Datasette Plugins ✓ it should have datasette.plugins (3 ms) ✓ registering a plugin should work (1 ms) Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 2 passed, 2 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 1.163 s
Ran all test suites.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for executing JavaScript unit tests 776635426 | |
752773508 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752773508 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc3MzUwOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T22:10:08Z | 2020-12-30T22:11:34Z | OWNER | https://twitter.com/dracos/status/1344402639476424706 points out that plugins returning 0 will be ignored. This should probably check for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752770488 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752770488 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc3MDQ4OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:55:35Z | 2020-12-30T21:58:26Z | OWNER | This one minifies to 241:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752770133 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752770133 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc3MDEzMw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:53:45Z | 2020-12-30T21:54:22Z | OWNER | FixMyStreet inlines some JavaScript, and it's always a good idea to copy what they're doing when it comes to web performance: https://github.com/mysociety/fixmystreet/blob/23e9564b58a86b783ce47f3c0bf837cbd4fe7282/templates/web/base/common_header_tags.html#L19-L25 Note |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752769452 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1164#issuecomment-752769452 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1164 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc2OTQ1Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:50:16Z | 2020-12-30T21:50:16Z | OWNER | If I implement this I can automate the CodeMirror minification and remove the bit about running |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for minifying JavaScript that ships with Datasette 776634318 | |
752768785 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1164#issuecomment-752768785 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1164 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc2ODc4NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:47:06Z | 2020-12-30T21:47:06Z | OWNER | If I'm going to minify |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for minifying JavaScript that ships with Datasette 776634318 | |
752768652 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1164#issuecomment-752768652 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1164 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc2ODY1Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:46:29Z | 2020-12-30T21:46:29Z | OWNER | Running https://skalman.github.io/UglifyJS-online/ against https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.53/datasette/static/table.js knocks it down from 7810 characters to 4643. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for minifying JavaScript that ships with Datasette 776634318 | |
752767500 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752767500 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc2NzUwMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:42:07Z | 2020-12-30T21:42:07Z | OWNER | Another option: have both "dev" and "production" versions of the plugin mechanism script. Make it easy to switch between the two. Build JavaScript unit tests that exercise the "production" APIs against the development version, and have extra tests that just work against the features in the development version. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752767174 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752767174 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc2NzE3NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:40:44Z | 2020-12-30T21:40:44Z | OWNER | Started a Twitter thread about this here: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1344392603794477056 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752751490 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752751490 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1MTQ5MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:40:04Z | 2020-12-30T21:34:22Z | OWNER | This one is 683 bytes with Uglify - I like how https://skalman.github.io/UglifyJS-online/ shows you the minified character count as you edit the script: ```javascript window.datasette = window.datasette || {}; window.datasette.plugins = (() => { var registry = {}; var definitions = {}; var stringify = JSON.stringify;
})();
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752760815 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752760815 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc2MDgxNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:15:41Z | 2020-12-30T21:15:41Z | OWNER | I'm going to write a few example plugins and try them out against the longer and shorter versions of the script, to get a better feel for how useful the longer versions with the error handling and explicit definition actually are. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752760054 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752760054 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc2MDA1NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:12:36Z | 2020-12-30T21:14:05Z | OWNER | I gotta admit that 262 byte version is pretty tempting, if it's going to end up in the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752759885 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752759885 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1OTg4NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:11:52Z | 2020-12-30T21:14:00Z | OWNER | 262 bytes if I remove the parameter introspection code, instead requiring plugin authors to specify the arguments they take:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752758802 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752758802 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1ODgwMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:07:33Z | 2020-12-30T21:10:10Z | OWNER | Removing the
})();
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752757910 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1165#issuecomment-752757910 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1165 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1NzkxMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:04:18Z | 2020-12-30T21:04:18Z | OWNER | https://jestjs.io/ looks worth trying here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for executing JavaScript unit tests 776635426 | |
752757289 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752757289 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1NzI4OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:02:20Z | 2020-12-30T21:02:20Z | OWNER | I'm going to need to add JavaScript unit tests for this new plugin system. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752757075 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1164#issuecomment-752757075 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1164 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1NzA3NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T21:01:27Z | 2020-12-30T21:01:27Z | OWNER | I don't want Datasette contributors to need a working Node.js install to run the tests or work on Datasette unless they are explicitly working on the JavaScript. I think I'm going to do this with a unit test that runs only if That way if anyone checks in a change to JavaScript but forgets to run the minifier the tests will fail in CI. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for minifying JavaScript that ships with Datasette 776634318 | |
752756612 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1164#issuecomment-752756612 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1164 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1NjYxMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:59:54Z | 2020-12-30T20:59:54Z | OWNER | I tried a few different pure-Python JavaScript minifying libraries and none of them produced results as good as https://www.npmjs.com/package/uglify-js for the plugin code I'm considering in #983. So I think I'll need to rely on a Node.js tool for this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for minifying JavaScript that ships with Datasette 776634318 | |
752750551 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752750551 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc1MDU1MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:36:38Z | 2020-12-30T20:37:48Z | OWNER | This version minifies to 702 characters: ```javascript window.datasette = window.datasette || {}; window.datasette.plugins = (() => { var registry = {}; var definitions = {}; var stringify = JSON.stringify;
})(); ``` Or 701 characters using https://skalman.github.io/UglifyJS-online/ |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752749189 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752749189 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc0OTE4OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:31:28Z | 2020-12-30T20:31:28Z | OWNER | Using raw string exceptions, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752748496 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752748496 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc0ODQ5Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:28:48Z | 2020-12-30T20:28:48Z | OWNER | If I'm going to minify it I'll need to figure out a build step in Datasette itself so that I can easily work on that minified version. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752747999 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752747999 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc0Nzk5OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:27:00Z | 2020-12-30T20:27:00Z | OWNER | I need to decide how this code is going to be loaded. Putting it in a blocking Running it through https://javascript-minifier.com/ produces this, which is 855 characters - so maybe I could inline that into the header of the page?
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752747169 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752747169 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc0NzE2OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:24:07Z | 2020-12-30T20:24:07Z | OWNER | This version adds
})();
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752744311 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752744311 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc0NDMxMQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:12:50Z | 2020-12-30T20:13:02Z | OWNER | This could work to define a plugin hook:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752744195 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752744195 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc0NDE5NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:12:26Z | 2020-12-30T20:12:26Z | OWNER | This implementation doesn't have an equivalent of "hookspecs" which can identify if a registered plugin implementation matches a known signature. I should add that, it will provide a better developer experience if someone has a typo. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752742669 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752742669 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1Mjc0MjY2OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T20:07:05Z | 2020-12-30T20:07:18Z | OWNER | Initial prototype: ```javascript window.datasette = {}; window.datasette.plugins = (function() { var registry = {};
})();
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752729035 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752729035 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjcyOTAzNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T19:15:56Z | 2020-12-30T19:16:44Z | OWNER | The
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752722863 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752722863 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjcyMjg2Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T18:52:39Z | 2020-12-30T18:52:39Z | OWNER | Then to call the plugins:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752721840 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752721840 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjcyMTg0MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T18:48:53Z | 2020-12-30T18:51:51Z | OWNER | Potential design:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752721069 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752721069 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjcyMTA2OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T18:46:10Z | 2020-12-30T18:46:10Z | OWNER | Pluggy does dependency injection by introspecting the named arguments to the Python function, which I really like. That's tricker in JavaScript. It looks like the only way to introspect a function is to look at the Even more challenging: JavaScript developers love minifying their code, and minification can shorten the function parameter names. From https://code-maven.com/dependency-injection-in-angularjs it looks like Angular.js does dependency injection and solves this by letting you optionally provide a separate list of the arguments your function uses:
I can copy that approach: I'll introspect by default, but provide a documented mechanism for explicitly listing your parameter names so that if you know your plugin code will be minified you can use that instead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752715412 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752715412 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjcxNTQxMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T18:25:31Z | 2020-12-30T18:25:31Z | OWNER | I'm going to introduce a global |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752715236 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752715236 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjcxNTIzNg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T18:24:54Z | 2020-12-30T18:24:54Z | OWNER | I think I'm going to try building a very lightweight clone of the core API design of Pluggy - not the advanced features, just the idea that plugins can register and a call to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429 | |
752714747 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/987#issuecomment-752714747 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjcxNDc0Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T18:23:08Z | 2020-12-30T18:23:20Z | OWNER | In terms of "places to put your plugin content", the simplest solution I can think of is something like this: ```html ``` Alternative designs:
I think the original option - an empty |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documented HTML hooks for JavaScript plugin authors 712984738 | |
752697279 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/987#issuecomment-752697279 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjY5NzI3OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T17:23:27Z | 2020-12-30T17:23:32Z | OWNER | Related problem: right now if you're writing custom template it's not at all obvious how to write them such that visualization plugins like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documented HTML hooks for JavaScript plugin authors 712984738 | |
752696499 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/987#issuecomment-752696499 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MjY5NjQ5OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-30T17:21:08Z | 2020-12-30T17:21:08Z | OWNER | More generally, I need to document certain areas of the page that JavaScript plugins are invited to append their content to - such that plugin authors can use them and feel confident that future changes to the Datasette templates won't break their plugins. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documented HTML hooks for JavaScript plugin authors 712984738 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4