issue_comments
2 rows where "created_at" is on date 2019-10-14, issue = 499954048 and reactions = "{"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0}" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Added support for multi arch builds · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
541837823 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/578#issuecomment-541837823 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/578 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MTgzNzgyMw== | heussd 887095 | 2019-10-14T18:19:42Z | 2019-10-14T18:19:42Z | NONE | My use case was: I wanted to use datasette on a Raspberry Pi. You are right, the build method is quite new and I would not be surprised if the syntax / command will change in future. The outcome however, a Docker multi-architecture manifest, is aligned with Docker's strategy on how to tackle multiple architectures: transparently, on the registry-side. I just thought it would be nice to have the official image ready for multiple architectures. But I fully understand if the current methods feel too experimental to be mergable... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added support for multi arch builds 499954048 | |
541495682 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/578#issuecomment-541495682 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/578 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MTQ5NTY4Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-14T03:57:17Z | 2019-10-14T03:57:17Z | OWNER | So this is a new Docker feature from April 2019? https://engineering.docker.com/2019/04/multi-arch-images/
Is there a strong use-case for supporting this while it's still experimental? Users who want Datasette to run on ARM can build their own image pretty easily, so I'm not sure if it's worth depending on an experimental feature for the core Datasette project. Is there any indication from the Docker team as to when this experimental feature might stop being marked as experimental? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added support for multi arch builds 499954048 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2