issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where issue = 1855885427 and user = 15178711 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • asg017 · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • De-tangling Metadata before Datasette 1.0 · 3 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
1684496274 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2143#issuecomment-1684496274 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2143 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5kZ1-S asg017 15178711 2023-08-18T22:30:45Z 2023-08-18T22:30:45Z CONTRIBUTOR

That said, I do really like a bias towards settings that can be changed at runtime

Does this include things like --settings values or plugin config? I can totally see being able to update metadata without restarting, but not sure if that would work well with --setting, plugin config, or auth/permissions stuff.

Well it could work with --setting and auth/permissions, with a lot of core changes. But changing plugin config on the fly could be challenging, for plugin authors. 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 De-tangling Metadata before Datasette 1.0 1855885427  
1684205563 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2143#issuecomment-1684205563 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2143 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5kYu_7 asg017 15178711 2023-08-18T17:12:54Z 2023-08-18T17:12:54Z CONTRIBUTOR

Another option would be, instead of flat datasette.json/datasette.yaml files, we could instead use a Python file, like datasette_config.py. That way one could dynamically generate config (ex dev vs prod, auto-discover credentials, etc.). Kinda like Django settings.

Though I imagine Python imports might make this complex to do, and json/yaml is already supported and pretty easy to write

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 De-tangling Metadata before Datasette 1.0 1855885427  
1684202932 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2143#issuecomment-1684202932 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2143 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5kYuW0 asg017 15178711 2023-08-18T17:10:21Z 2023-08-18T17:10:21Z CONTRIBUTOR

I agree with all your points!

I think the best solution would be having a datasette.json config file, where you "configure" your datasette instances, with settings, permissions/auth, plugin configuration, and table settings (sortable column, label columns, etc.). Which #2093 would do.

Then optionally, you have a metadata.json, or use datasette_metadata, or some other plugin to define metadata (ex the future sqlite-docs plugin).

Everything in datasette.json could also be overwritten by CLI flags, like --setting key value, --plugin xxxx key value.

We could even completely remove settings.json in favor or just datasette.json. Mostly because I think the less files the better, especially if they have generic names like settings.json or config.json. 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 De-tangling Metadata before Datasette 1.0 1855885427  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);