issues
555 rows where repo = 107914493 and state = "open" sorted by comments
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: milestone, comments, author_association, draft, updated_at (date)
created_at (date) >30 ✖
- 2020-12-29 4
- 2022-02-02 4
- 2022-03-20 4
- 2022-04-11 4
- 2023-08-24 4
- 2019-05-23 3
- 2020-05-28 3
- 2020-09-30 3
- 2020-10-09 3
- 2021-01-05 3
- 2021-01-06 3
- 2021-01-15 3
- 2021-02-18 3
- 2021-04-02 3
- 2021-04-12 3
- 2021-08-13 3
- 2021-11-15 3
- 2022-04-27 3
- 2022-10-27 3
- 2022-11-30 3
- 2023-01-09 3
- 2023-07-27 3
- 2023-11-05 3
- 2023-11-15 3
- 2017-11-19 2
- 2018-04-09 2
- 2018-04-16 2
- 2018-05-16 2
- 2018-05-29 2
- 2018-07-31 2
- …
state 1
- open · 555 ✖
repo 1
- datasette · 555 ✖
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments ▼ | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
268110769 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNjgxMTA3Njk= | 33 | Use locust for benchmarking and load tests | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2017-10-24T17:00:09Z | 2017-12-10T03:12:16Z | OWNER | https://github.com/locustio/locust Needed for #32 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/33/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
275159710 | MDU6SXNzdWUyNzUxNTk3MTA= | 128 | Every visualization should have an "embed" button | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2017-11-19T13:38:13Z | 2019-05-13T18:33:51Z | OWNER | At least for the first round of visualizations, any time you construct one using the UI the result should include an "embed this" button that returns source code to copy and paste These examples should use unpkg.com (or similarl) urls with SRI hashes, eg https://www.srihash.org - and should load data from the datasette JSON API. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/128/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
312395790 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTU3OTA= | 197 | Ability to sort by more than one column | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-09T05:13:30Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:37Z | OWNER | Split off from #189. I'd like to support "sort by X descending, then by Y ascending if there are dupes for X" as well. Suggested syntax for that:
we currently only allow one argument to be sent. We should allow as many arguments as there are columns, for example:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/197/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
312396095 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzOTYwOTU= | 198 | Ability to sort with nulls last | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-09T05:15:40Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:37Z | OWNER | Split off from #189 Here's how to do that in SQL: https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight-2628db9?sql=select+rowid%2C+*+from+%5Bnfl-wide-receivers%2Fadvanced-historical%5D%0D%0Aorder+by+case+when+career_ranypa+is+null+then+1+else+0+end%2C+career_ranypa%2C+rowid
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/198/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
314771615 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTQ3NzE2MTU= | 218 | Support custom unit display in order to handle "$10,000" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-16T18:39:31Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:38Z | OWNER | I tried to get Datasette to display It would be neat if there was a mechanism for specifying a custom unit display - maybe something like this:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/218/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
314834783 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTQ4MzQ3ODM= | 219 | Expose units in the JSON API? | russss 45057 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-16T22:04:25Z | 2018-04-16T22:04:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | From #203: it would be nice for the JSON API to (optionally) return columns rendered with units in them - if, for example, you're consuming the JSON to render the rows on a map. I'm not entirely sure how useful this will be though - at the moment my map queries are custom SQL queries (a few have joins in, the rest might be fetching large amounts of data so it makes sense to limit columns fetched). Perhaps the SQL function is a better approach in general. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/219/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
318490133 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMTg0OTAxMzM= | 241 | Default datasette logging format should be JSON | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-04-27T17:32:48Z | 2018-07-10T17:45:40Z | OWNER | Structured logs are better. Datasette should default to outputting it's HTTP access log lines as newline delimited JSON instead of the Sanic default format it uses at the moment. For improved greppability these logs should have keys ordered in a consistent way. Python's JSON module can do this with ordered dictionaries. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/241/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
320132682 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjAxMzI2ODI= | 250 | Setup some issue templates | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-05-04T01:49:07Z | 2018-05-04T01:49:07Z | OWNER | https://twitter.com/left_pad/status/99216385740464537 I like the idea of using these to help people understand some of the ways I want to use issues. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/250/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
326778161 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjY3NzgxNjE= | 290 | Consider increasing the default for num_sql_threads (currently 3) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-05-27T00:52:41Z | 2018-05-27T00:52:41Z | OWNER | I ran a very rough micro-benchmark on the new
Then
| Number of threads | Requests/second | |---|---| | 1 | 4.57 | | 3 | 9.77 | | 10 | 13.53 | | 20 | 15.24 | 50 | 8.21 | This was on my early 2018 OS X laptop. Need to benchmark in other common environments before making a decision on changing the default. That said, the default of 3 was a number I plucked out of thin air. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/290/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
344654623 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDQ2NTQ2MjM= | 347 | Rename "datasette package" to "datasette publish docker" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-07-26T00:42:46Z | 2018-07-26T00:42:46Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/347/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
346026869 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDYwMjY4Njk= | 354 | Handle many-to-many relationships | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-07-31T04:03:13Z | 2020-11-24T19:51:18Z | OWNER | This is a master tracking ticket for various many-2-many features. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/354/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
359075028 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjE0NjUzNjQx | 364 | Support for other types of databases using external connectors | jsancho-gpl 11912854 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-09-11T14:31:47Z | 2018-09-11T14:31:47Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/364 | This PR is related to #293, but now all commits have been merged. The purpose is to support other file formats that aren't SQLite, like files with PyTables format. I've tried to accomplish that using external connectors published with entry points. The modifications in the original datasette code are minimal and many are in a separated file. |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/364/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
377166793 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNzcxNjY3OTM= | 372 | Docker build tools | psychemedia 82988 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-11-04T16:02:35Z | 2018-11-04T16:02:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | In terms of small pieces lightly joined, I note that there are several tools starting to appear for building generating Dockerfiles and building Docker containers from simpler components such as If plugin/extensions builders want to include additional packages, then things like incremental builds of composable builds that add additional items into a base Examples of Dockerfile generators / container builders: Discussions / threads (via Binderhub gitter) on:
- why Relates to things like: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/372/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 2, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
426722204 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MjY3MjIyMDQ= | 423 | ?_search_col=X not reflected correctly in the UI | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-03-28T21:48:19Z | 2020-11-03T19:01:59Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/423/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
440325850 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjc1OTIzMDY2 | 452 | SQL builder utility classes | russss 45057 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-05-04T13:57:47Z | 2019-05-04T14:03:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/452 | This adds a straightforward set of classes to aid in the construction of SQL queries. My plan for this was to allow plugins to manipulate the
Datasette-generated SQL in a more structured way. I'm not sure that's
going to work, but I feel like this is still a step forward - it
reduces the number of intermediate variables in There are a fair number of minor structure changes in here too as I've
tried to make the ordering of |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/452/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
449445715 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk0NDU3MTU= | 491 | Figure out how to use Firebase with cloudrun to enable vanity URLs and CDN caching | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-05-28T19:48:06Z | 2019-05-28T19:48:35Z | OWNER | It looks like Firebase can solve a couple of problems with the existing
https://firebase.google.com/docs/hosting/cloud-run looks like it can help with both of these. Lots of interesting questions:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/491/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
459469278 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTk0NjkyNzg= | 515 | Try shrinking official image with docker-slim | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-06-22T12:25:37Z | 2019-06-22T12:25:37Z | OWNER | This looks really promising: https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim If it can shave substantial size from our official container reliably we could add it to the automated build process. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/515/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
460095928 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjAwOTU5Mjg= | 528 | Establish a pattern for Datasette plugins built on top of Pandas | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-06-24T21:05:52Z | 2019-06-24T21:05:52Z | OWNER | The Pandas ecosystem is huge, varied and full of tools that are really good at doing interesting analysis on top of tabular data. Pandas should not be a dependency of Datasette core, but I think there is a lot of potential in having plugins which use Pandas to apply interesting analysis to data sucked out of Datasette's SQLite tables. One example (thanks, Tony): https://github.com/ResidentMario/missingno could form the basis of a fantastic plugin for getting a high-level overview of how complete each column in a table is. Some thought is needed here about what shape these kind of plugins might take, and what plugin hooks they would use. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/528/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
503053243 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMwNTMyNDM= | 582 | Datasette should not completely crash if one SQLite database is malformed | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-10-06T05:11:43Z | 2019-10-06T05:11:43Z | OWNER | If you run Datasette against a number of database files and one of them is malformed, you get this 500 error on the index page: It would be better if Datasette still worked and listed the databases that were NOT malformed, then showed an inline error message just for the one that could not be accessed. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/582/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
530468212 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MzA0NjgyMTI= | 643 | Set up some basic benchmarks as part of the unit tests | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-11-29T19:24:19Z | 2019-11-29T19:24:19Z | OWNER | https://pypi.org/project/pytest-benchmark/ looks great for this. Here's how to run it as a github action: https://github.com/rhysd/github-action-benchmark/blob/master/examples/pytest/README.md |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/643/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
593006814 | MDU6SXNzdWU1OTMwMDY4MTQ= | 715 | Refactor duplicate cell display logic | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-04-03T00:58:11Z | 2020-04-03T00:58:11Z | OWNER | The logic for rendering cells in table view and in database (or canned query) view is currently very similar: Compared with: I'll be changing this a bit in #698 but I should still try to clean this up more further in the future. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/715/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
594237015 | MDU6SXNzdWU1OTQyMzcwMTU= | 718 | Plugin idea: datasette-redirects | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-04-05T03:41:38Z | 2023-08-30T22:17:31Z | OWNER | I just had to write a one-off custom plugin to redirect niche-musems.com to www.niche-museums.com (https://github.com/simonw/museums/issues/21) - it would be great if this kind of thing could be handled by a configurable plugin. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/718/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
reopened | |||||||
613491342 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTM0OTEzNDI= | 762 | Experiment with PRAGMA hard_heap_limit | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-05-06T17:33:23Z | 2020-05-07T03:08:44Z | OWNER | This was added in SQLite 2020-01-22 (3.31.0): https://www.sqlite.org/changes.html#version_3_31_0
This sounds like it could be a nice extra safety measure. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/762/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
626582657 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjY1ODI2NTc= | 779 | Make human_description_en explicitly available to output renderers | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-05-28T14:59:54Z | 2020-05-28T14:59:54Z | OWNER |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette-atom/blob/df98a6c43a443224b6cd232f84703ec297ef046b/datasette_atom/init.py#L36-L37
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/779/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
638238548 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzgyMzg1NDg= | 845 | Code coverage should ignore files in .coveragerc | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-06-13T21:45:42Z | 2020-06-13T21:46:03Z | OWNER | I'm not sure why this is, but the code coverage I have running in a GitHub Action doesn't take my Here's the bit that's ignored: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cf7a2bdb404734910ec07abc7571351a2d934828/.coveragerc#L1-L2 As a result my coverage score is 84%, when it should be 92%:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/845/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
648659536 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDg2NTk1MzY= | 881 | Figure out why restore_working_directory is needed in some places | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-07-01T04:19:25Z | 2020-07-01T04:19:25Z | OWNER | This is a frustrating workaround. I have a /usr/local/opt/python/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/contextlib.py:112: in enter return next(self.gen) self = <click.testing.CliRunner object at 0x1135ad110>
I'd like to not have to do this. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/881/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
668064026 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NjgwNjQwMjY= | 911 | Rethink the --name option to "datasette publish" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-07-29T18:49:49Z | 2020-07-29T18:49:49Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/911/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
675594325 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NzU1OTQzMjU= | 917 | Idea: "datasette publish" option for "only if the data has changed | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-08-08T21:58:27Z | 2020-08-08T21:58:27Z | OWNER | This is a pattern I often find myself needing. I usually implement this in GitHub Actions like this:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/917/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
691537426 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTE1Mzc0MjY= | 959 | Internals API idea: results.dicts in addition to results.rows | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-09-03T00:50:17Z | 2020-09-03T00:50:17Z | OWNER | I just wrote this code:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/959/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
730210880 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MzAyMTA4ODA= | 1055 | query.html and table.html should share the same table implementation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-10-27T07:58:21Z | 2020-10-27T07:58:29Z | OWNER | In #998 I made a change that affected the table page but didn't affect the query page because I incorrectly assumed they shared rendering logic. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1055/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
741231849 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NDEyMzE4NDk= | 1087 | Idea: ?_extra=urls for getting back URLs to useful things | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-11-12T02:55:41Z | 2021-12-15T18:06:16Z | OWNER | Working on https://github.com/simonw/datasette-search-all/issues/10 made me realize that sometimes it can be difficult to calculate the URL for a database, table or row within Datasette. It would be useful to have an optional extra JSON extension (using |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1087/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
750089847 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTAwODk4NDc= | 1109 | Deprecate --config in Datasette 1.0 (in favour of --setting) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-11-24T21:43:57Z | 2020-12-17T22:07:49Z | OWNER | I added a deprecation warning to this in #992. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1109/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
756875827 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTY4NzU4Mjc= | 1129 | Fix footer to the bottom of the page | abdusco 3243482 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-12-04T07:28:07Z | 2020-12-04T16:04:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Footer doesn't stick to the bottom if the body content isn't long enough to reach the end of viewport. This can be fixed using flexbox. ```css body { min-height: 100vh; display: flex; flex-direction: column; } .content { flex-grow: 1; } ``` |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1129/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
776128269 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NzYxMjgyNjk= | 1162 | First working version of "datasette insert data.db file.csv" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-12-29T23:20:11Z | 2021-06-17T18:12:32Z | OWNER | Refs #1160 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1162/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
778530523 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Nzg1MzA1MjM= | 1172 | /-/static should be excluded from auth and permission checks | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-01-05T02:53:41Z | 2021-01-05T02:53:41Z | OWNER | I want to set far future / immutable cache headers on everything served from This has security implications since it will be possible to see what plugins are installed by checking for known static URLs. I'm fine with that - performance is more important here. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1172/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
787104850 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODcxMDQ4NTA= | 1192 | Form Plugin for in-depth Datasette Querying | tomershvueli 1024355 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-01-15T18:24:50Z | 2021-01-15T18:24:50Z | NONE | I envision a sort of easy-to-build form plugin that would be able to map a user's inputs to different fields/columns in a Datasette database. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1192/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
808771690 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MDg3NzE2OTA= | 1225 | More flexible formatting of records with CSS grid | mhalle 649467 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-02-15T19:28:17Z | 2021-02-15T19:28:35Z | NONE | In several applications I've been experimenting with alternate formatting of datasette query results. Lately I've found that CSS grids work very well and seem quite general for formatting rows. In CSS I use grid templates to define the layout of each record and the regions for each field, hiding the fields I don't want. It's pretty flexible and looks good. It's also a great basis for highly responsive layout. I initially thought I'd only use this feature for record detail views, but now I use it for index views as well. However, there are some limitations:
* With the existing table templates, it seems that you can change the It would be helpful to at least have an official example or test that used a grid layout for records to make sure nothing in datasette breaks with it. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1225/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
824750134 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MjQ3NTAxMzQ= | 1251 | facet option not appearing when table is big | verajosemanuel 15836677 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-03-08T16:54:04Z | 2021-03-08T16:54:16Z | NONE | I have a big table with more than 500.000 rows. Trying to facet by one of my columns, the options are not available as for the other smaller tables. I have tried to set it in URL as:
to no avail. is there any limit? how can I force the option "facet" to appear for big tables? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1251/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
839367451 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MzkzNjc0NTE= | 1275 | Idea: long-running query mode | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-03-24T05:23:20Z | 2021-03-24T05:23:20Z | OWNER | It would be cool if you could run Datasette in a long-running query mode, for use with trusted users - something like this:
This would disable the query limit, but would also enable a feature where if a query takes longer than e.g. 1s to return Datasette returns an HTML page to the browser with a progress indicator and polls the server until the query is complete.... but also provides the user with a "cancel" button. This relates to the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1275/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
843884745 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NDM4ODQ3NDU= | 1283 | advanced #export causes unexpected scrolling | mroswell 192568 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-03-29T22:46:57Z | 2021-03-29T22:46:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
The user remedy seems to be to manually remove the "#export" from the URL. This behavior happens in my project, and in: https://covid-19.datasettes.com/covid/economist_excess_deaths (for instance) but not in this table: https://global-power-plants.datasettes.com/global-power-plants/global-power-plants |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1283/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
847700726 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NDc3MDA3MjY= | 1285 | Feature Request or Plugin Request: Numeric Range Facets | mroswell 192568 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-01T01:50:20Z | 2021-04-01T02:28:19Z | CONTRIBUTOR | It would be great to offer facets for numeric data ranges. The ranges could pull from typical GIS methods of creating choropleth maps. https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/ Of the following, for mapping, I've always preferred a Jenks Natural Breaks, or a cross between Jenks and Pretty breaks.
Here are some links for Natural Breaks, in case this method is unfamiliar.
Per that last link, there is a Jenks Python module... They also describe it as data-intensive for larger datasets. Maybe this is a good plugin idea. An example of equal Intervals would be 0 – < 10 10 – < 20 20 – < 30 30 – < 40 It's kind of confusing to have that less-than sign in there. it could also be displayed as: 0 – 10 10 – 20 20 – 30 30 – 40 But then it's not completely clear which category 10 is in, for instance. (Best to right-justify.. and use an "en dash" between numbers.) |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1285/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
849512840 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NDk1MTI4NDA= | 1288 | Facets: show counts for null | jungle-boogie 1111743 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-02T22:33:44Z | 2021-04-02T22:33:44Z | NONE | Hi, Thank you for Datasette and being a fan of SQLite! Not all rows in a record will always contain data. So when using a facet on a column where some records have data and others don't, you don't get an accurate count of the results. Please consider also counting and showing null records with facets. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1288/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
853672224 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NTM2NzIyMjQ= | 1294 | "You can check out any time you like. But you can never leave!" | mroswell 192568 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-08T17:02:15Z | 2021-04-08T18:35:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | (Feel free to rename this one.)
UPDATE: - It would be helpful to have a "Previous page" available for all but the first table page. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1294/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
855451460 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NTU0NTE0NjA= | 1297 | Documentation: json1, and introspection endpoints | mroswell 192568 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-12T00:38:00Z | 2021-04-12T01:29:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/facets.html notes that:
When I check -/versions I see two sections relevant to json1:
The ENABLE_JSON1 makes me think json1 is likely available. But the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1297/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
856895291 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NTY4OTUyOTE= | 1299 | Design better empty states | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-13T12:06:12Z | 2021-04-13T12:06:12Z | OWNER | Inspiration here: https://emptystat.es/ |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1299/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
860734722 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NjA3MzQ3MjI= | 1302 | Fix disappearing facets | mroswell 192568 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-18T18:42:33Z | 2021-04-20T07:40:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Since my site is devoted to whether disinfectants are Safer or Toxic, having the suggested facet disappear from the suggested facet list is very confusing* to end-users. This, along with a few other issues, unfortunately proved beyond my own programming ability to address. So I hired a Senior-level developer to address a number of issues, including this disappearing act.
I'm not sure how to do a pull request for this, because the plugin contains other functionality that goes beyond this bug. I wanted the facets sorted in a certain order (both in the suggested facet list, and the detail lists) (... the detail lists were hopping around all over the place before...) I wanted the duplicate facets removed (leaving only the one where you can facet by individual item in an array.) I wanted the arrays to be presented in a prettier fashion (I did that in the template... That could be moved over to the plugin at some point) I'm thinking it'll be very helpful if applicable parts of my project's plugin (sort_suggested_facets_plugin.py) will be able to be incorporated back into datasette, but I leave that to you to consider. (* The disappearing facet bug was especially confusing because I'm removing the filters and sql from the table page, at the request of the organization. The filters and sql detail created a lot of confusion for end users who try to find disinfectants used by Hospitals, for instance, as an '=' won't find them, since they are part of the Use_site array.) My disappearing-facet confusion was documented in my own issue: https://github.com/mroswell/list-N/issues/57 (addressed by the plugin). Other facet-related issues here: https://github.com/mroswell/list-N/issues/54 (addressed by the plugin); https://github.com/mroswell/list-N/issues/15 (addressed by template); https://github.com/mroswell/list-N/issues/53 (not yet addressed). |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1302/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
870946764 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NzA5NDY3NjQ= | 1312 | how to query many-to-many relationship via json API? | bram2000 5268174 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-29T12:09:49Z | 2021-04-29T12:09:49Z | NONE | Hi, Firstly thanks for Datasette, it's great! I'm trying to use the JSON API to query data from a Datasette instance. I have a simple 3 table many-to-many relationship, like so:
the Now I want to return "all documents within category X" but I cannot see a way to do this without executing two queries; the first to lookup the row_id of category X, and the second to join I could easily write this in SQL, but this makes programmatic handling of pagination much more difficult (we'd have to dynamically modify the SQL to select the row_id and include the correct where and limit clauses). Is there a way to achieve this using the JSON API? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1312/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
871304967 | MDU6SXNzdWU4NzEzMDQ5Njc= | 1315 | settings.json should be picked up by "datasette publish cloudrun" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-04-29T18:16:41Z | 2021-04-29T18:16:41Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1315/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
915488244 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MTU0ODgyNDQ= | 1372 | Add section to "writing plugins" about security, e.g. avoiding XSS | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-06-08T20:49:33Z | 2021-06-08T20:49:46Z | OWNER | https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/writing_plugins.html should have tips on writing secure plugins. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1372/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
924203783 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MjQyMDM3ODM= | 1379 | Idea: ?_end=1 option for streaming CSV responses | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-06-17T18:11:21Z | 2021-06-17T18:11:30Z | OWNER | As discussed in this thread: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1405554676993433605 - one of the disadvantages of Datasette's streaming CSV feature is that it's hard to tell if you got the whole file or if the connection ended early - or if an error occurred. Idea: offer an optional
For however many columns the CSV file usually has. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1379/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
925491857 | MDU6SXNzdWU5MjU0OTE4NTc= | 1383 | Improve test coverage for `inspect.py` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-06-20T00:22:43Z | 2021-06-20T00:22:49Z | OWNER | https://codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/src/main/datasette/inspect.py shows only 36% coverage for that module at the moment. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1383/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
947596222 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NjkyNTU3Mzgx | 1399 | Multiple sort | jgryko5 87192257 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-07-19T12:20:14Z | 2021-07-19T12:20:14Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1399 | Closes #197. I have added support for sorting by multiple parameters as mentioned in the issue above, and together with that, a suggestion on how to implement such sorting in the user interface. |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1399/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
953218043 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTMyMTgwNDM= | 1403 | Labels explaining what hidden tables are for | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-07-26T19:29:22Z | 2022-03-21T22:20:37Z | OWNER | A reasonable question: "What are those hidden tables for?" This could be answered by adding a small piece of explanatory text to each table - based on if it's related to FTS or to SpatiaLite or configured to be hidden for some other reason. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1403/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
957315684 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczMTU2ODQ= | 1410 | Rename settings to `default_allow_facet` and `default_allow_download` and `default_allow_csv_stream` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2021-07-31T20:27:12Z | 2021-07-31T20:27:49Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1409#issuecomment-890400425 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1410/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
957347860 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczNDc4NjA= | 1412 | Mention WAL mode in the documentation (plus backup tips) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-08-01T00:27:11Z | 2021-08-01T00:27:11Z | OWNER | This is useful for people who are deploying Datasette with any write functionality, especially if they might be using something like EFS. I can add a section about this to the bottom of https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/deploying.html and then link to that section from both https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/sql_queries.html#writable-canned-queries and https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/internals.html#await-db-execute-write-sql-params-none-block-false Also useful: mention that just copying a SQLite database file while it is being written to may not get a consistent file, so tell people to use one of the SQLite backup mechanisms instead. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1412/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
970626625 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NzA2MjY2MjU= | 1435 | Turn off suggest facets on tables with large numbers of columns | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-08-13T18:30:48Z | 2021-08-13T18:30:48Z | OWNER | If a table has 200 columns it will take multiple seconds to try and suggest facets. I should either quit after the first 20 or not suggest facets at all. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1435/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
982803408 | MDU6SXNzdWU5ODI4MDM0MDg= | 1454 | Feature Request: Publish to IPFS | blitmap 1560788 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-08-30T13:36:18Z | 2021-08-30T13:36:18Z | NONE | Hello, I am a huge fan of this being used for exploring data. I think it has a lot of flexibility not found in other tools. I'm not sure if what I'm asking for is possible: Can this be extended to publish to IPFS? IPFS is an attractive hosting option for decentralized journalism. Food for thought ~ |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1454/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
988552851 | MDU6SXNzdWU5ODg1NTI4NTE= | 1456 | conda install results in non-functioning `datasette serve` due to out-of-date asgiref | ctb 51016 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-09-05T16:59:55Z | 2021-09-05T16:59:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Over in https://github.com/ctb/2021-sourmash-datasette, I discovered that the following commands fail:
This appears to be because asgiref 3.3.4 doesn't have WebSocketScope, but later versions do - a simple
fixes the problem for me, at least to the point where I can run datasette and poke around as usual. I note that over in the conda-forge recipe, https://github.com/conda-forge/datasette-feedstock/blob/master/recipe/meta.yaml pins asgiref to < 3.4.0, but I'm not sure why - so I'm not sure how to best resolve this issue :). |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1456/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
989109888 | MDU6SXNzdWU5ODkxMDk4ODg= | 1460 | Override column metadata with metadata from another column | MichaelTiemannOSC 72577720 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-09-06T12:13:33Z | 2021-09-06T12:13:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have a table from the PUDL project (https://github.com/catalyst-cooperative/pudl) that looks like this:
Note that @catalyst-cooperative |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1460/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
991206402 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzI5NzA0NTM3 | 1465 | add support for -o --get /path | ctb 51016 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-09-08T14:30:42Z | 2021-09-08T14:31:45Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1465 | Fixes https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1459 Adds support for If TODO items:
- [ ] update documentation
- [ ] print out error message when note, '@CTB' is used in this PR to flag code that needs revisiting. |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1465/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1 | ||||||
1001104942 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c4r-EVH | 1475 | feat: allow joins using _through in both directions | bram2000 5268174 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-09-20T15:28:20Z | 2021-09-20T15:28:20Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1475 | Currently the This is an admittedly hacky change to implement bidirectional joins using |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1475/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
1006016302 | I_kwDOBm6k_c479pcu | 1477 | Consider adding request to the documented default template context | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-09-24T02:34:09Z | 2021-09-24T02:34:09Z | OWNER | I made a plugin for this today but I think perhaps it should be a default thing instead: https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-template-request |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1477/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1006781949 | I_kwDOBm6k_c48AkX9 | 1478 | Documentation Request: Feature alternative ID instead of default ID | mroswell 192568 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-09-24T19:56:13Z | 2021-09-25T16:18:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | My data already has an ID that comes from a federal agency. Would love to have documentation on how to modify the template to: - Remove the generated ID from the table - Link the federal ID to the detail page - and to ensure that the JSON file uses that as the ID. I'd be happy to include the database ID in the export, but not as a key. I don't want to remove the ID from the database, though, because my experience with the federal agency is that data often has anomalies. I don't want all hell to break loose if they end up applying the same ID to multiple rows (which they haven't done yet). I just don't want it to display in the table or the data exports. Perhaps this isn't a template issue, maybe more of a db manipulation... Margie |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1478/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1049946823 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-lOrH | 1502 | Full-text search: No support to unary "-" operator | gustavorps 516827 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-11-10T15:11:19Z | 2021-11-10T15:11:19Z | NONE | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1502/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
1051277222 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-qTem | 1504 | Link to ?_size=max at bottom of table page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-11-11T19:06:33Z | 2021-11-11T19:06:33Z | OWNER | This can have text such as "Show 1,000 rows per page", based on the max size limit setting. Would make it easier for people to see more data at once without having to know how to hack the URL, similar to the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1504/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1056746091 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-_Kpr | 1515 | Handle foreign keys that point to a non-existent table | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-11-17T23:40:13Z | 2021-11-18T01:31:56Z | OWNER | Spotted in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-graphql/issues/79 Demo: https://datasette-graphql-demo.datasette.io/fixtures/bad_foreign_key The foreign key links to a 404 page. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1515/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1059209412 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_IkDE | 1523 | Come up with a more elegant solution for base_url than ds.urls.path() | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-11-20T19:05:22Z | 2021-11-20T19:05:22Z | OWNER | While fixing #1519 I added a lot of ugly code that looks like this: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/08947fa76433d18988aa1ee1d929bd8320c75fe2/datasette/facets.py#L228-L230 See these two commits in particular: fe687fd0207c4c56c4778d3e92e3505fc4b18172 and 08947fa76433d18988aa1ee1d929bd8320c75fe2 It would be great to come up with a less verbose and error-prone way of handling this problem. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1523/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1067775061 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_pPRV | 1539 | Research PRAGMA query_only | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-11-30T23:30:24Z | 2021-11-30T23:30:24Z | OWNER | https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_query_only
Would it be worth adding this as an extra protection against accidental writes to a DB file over a read-only connection? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1539/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1091257796 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5BC0XE | 1584 | give error with recursive sql | tunguyenatwork 58088336 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-12-30T18:53:16Z | 2021-12-30T18:53:16Z | NONE | I got an error "near "WITH": syntax error" after I upgraded to version 0.59 from 0.52.4. This error is related to recursive sql. It works great on the previous version but it failed after upgraded. Below is an example of sql: WITH RECURSIVE manager_of(position, super_position) AS (SELECT position, case ifnull(INDIRECT_SUPER_POSITION,'') when '' then super_position else INDIRECT_SUPER_POSITION end as SUPER_POSITION FROM position where super_position<>'SGV000000001' and super_position!='' and position <> super_position),chain_manager_of_position(position, level) AS (SELECT super_position, 1 as level FROM manager_of WHERE super_position!='' and (position=:pos or position in (Select position from employee where employee=:ein)) UNION ALL SELECT super_position, level+1 as level FROM manager_of JOIN chain_manager_of_position USING(position)) SELECT * FROM chain_manager_of_position left join employee using(position) where employee is not NULL order by level limit 1 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1584/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1102568047 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Bt9pv | 1596 | Documentation page warning of changes coming in 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-01-13T23:26:04Z | 2022-01-13T23:26:04Z | OWNER | I should start this relatively soon. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1596/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1102966378 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Bve5q | 1599 | Add architecture documentation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-01-14T04:55:38Z | 2022-01-14T04:56:03Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1599/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
1122450452 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5zwU | 1625 | Try running tests against macOS and Windows in addition to Ubuntu | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-02-02T22:25:57Z | 2022-02-02T22:25:57Z | OWNER | I already do this for Related: - #1617 - #1545 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1625/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1122557010 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C6NxS | 1627 | Get the tests passing against Windows | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-02-03T01:23:06Z | 2022-02-03T01:23:32Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1626#issuecomment-1028515161 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1627/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1125576543 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5DFu9f | 1630 | Review datasette.utils and decide which functions should be documented for 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-02-07T06:39:52Z | 2022-02-07T06:39:52Z | OWNER | Follows: - #1176 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1630/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1142107925 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5EEy8V | 1638 | `filters_from_request` plugin hook docs should mention that returning an async function is allowed | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-02-18T00:08:26Z | 2022-02-18T00:08:26Z | OWNER | https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#filters-from-request-request-database-table-datasette doesn't mention that you can return an |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1638/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1148638868 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5EdtaU | 1639 | Make datasette-redirect-forbidden unneccessary | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-02-23T22:18:46Z | 2022-02-23T22:18:46Z | OWNER | I wrote This should be a feature of Datasette core. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1639/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1175894898 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFrty | 1680 | Consider simplifying permissions for 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-03-21T20:17:29Z | 2022-03-21T20:17:29Z | OWNER | Permission checks right now can express one of three opinions:
But... there's also a concept of a "default" for a given permission check, which might be I worry this is too complicated. Could this be simplified before 1.0? In particular the default concept. See also: - #1676 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1680/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1181037277 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GZTLd | 1686 | heroku bails if app name specifed in datasette publish is the same as existing app | tlongers 2115933 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-03-25T17:10:34Z | 2022-03-25T17:10:34Z | NONE | Seem that
The resulting error has the below traceback:
It's a solid failsafe, but does |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1686/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1181364043 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Gai9L | 1687 | Make show_json.html or a similar mechanism stable for plugins | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-03-25T23:42:45Z | 2022-03-25T23:42:45Z | OWNER | I used It would be useful if it (or something like it) was documented and stable for plugins to use. Also relevant: - #878 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1687/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1196327155 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HToDz | 1702 | Be more consistent with column quoting | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-04-07T16:59:20Z | 2022-04-07T16:59:20Z | OWNER | This tutorial made me notice that Datasette is pretty inconsistent with how column quoting works: https://datasette.io/tutorials/learn-sql It has examples of each of Datasette should generate SQL as consistently as possible to support learners. That tutorial should also provide a tiny bit of extra information about what's going on here. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1702/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1197925865 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZuXp | 1704 | File PRs against incompatible plugins pinning to datasette<1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-04-08T23:15:30Z | 2022-04-08T23:15:30Z | OWNER | As part of the preparation for the 1.0 release, test all existing known plugins against the alpha. For any that break, submit a PR suggesting they pin to a version <1.0 - and include a link to the documentation on how to upgrade the plugin for 1.0. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1704/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1216436131 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IgVej | 1721 | Implement plugin hooks: `register_table_extras`, `register_row_extras`, `register_query_extras` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a-next 8755003 | 0 | 2022-04-26T20:21:49Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:07Z | OWNER | Designed in: - #1720 Part of: - #262 - #1709 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1721/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
1216479167 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Igf-_ | 1722 | `db.primary_keys()` and `db.table_columns()` don't show up in traces | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-04-26T21:08:36Z | 2022-04-26T21:08:36Z | OWNER | Noticed this while working on: - #1715 This code here isn't showing up in traces: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/579f59dcec43a91dd7d404e00b87a00afd8515f2/datasette/views/table.py#L218-L220 Because those functions don't use the regular trace-instrumented |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1722/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1216622905 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IhDE5 | 1725 | Performance question - what is happening in this gap? | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-04-27T00:21:11Z | 2022-04-27T00:21:11Z | OWNER | Trace from https://latest-with-plugins.datasette.io/github/commits?_facet=repo&_trace=1&_facet=committer What's going on in that gap? Can I improve the tracing output to show some non-SQL queries to figure that out? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1725/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1217014076 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Iiik8 | 1726 | Security page in the documentation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-04-27T08:43:30Z | 2022-04-27T08:43:30Z | OWNER | A page talking about how to run Datasette securely, and security concerns to take into account. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1726/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1219398983 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Iro1H | 1730 | SQL tracing should much more closely track the SQL query execution | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-04-28T22:41:04Z | 2022-04-28T22:41:10Z | OWNER | In #1727 I realized that the SQL tracing was measuring a whole bunch of stuff outside of the SQL query itself. I started experimenting with this fix for that but it didn't work - I got back an empty JSON array of traces for some reason: ```diff diff --git a/datasette/database.py b/datasette/database.py index ba594a8..d7f9172 100644 --- a/datasette/database.py +++ b/datasette/database.py @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import sys import threading import uuid -from .tracer import trace +from .tracer import trace, trace_child_tasks from .utils import ( detect_fts, detect_primary_keys, @@ -207,30 +207,31 @@ class Database: time_limit_ms = custom_time_limit
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1727#issuecomment-1111602802 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1730/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1237871948 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5JyG1M | 1743 | `datasette.utils.to_css_class()` should be a documented internal | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-05-16T23:57:26Z | 2022-05-16T23:57:26Z | OWNER | Because I'm using it in this plugin: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-upload-dbs/issues/1 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1743/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1247315144 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5KWITI | 1749 | LDAP auth plugin | benswift 380241 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-05-25T01:35:12Z | 2022-05-25T01:35:12Z | NONE | A search of the plugins directory doesn't turn up anything, but is is possible to set up a Datasette app which uses my organisation's LDAP for auth? If not, how much work would it be to write one (I may have some spare cycles on my team to do this, but we haven't written a datasette plugin before). |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1749/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1251700382 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Km26e | 1750 | Allow `label_column` to specify array of columns | knutwannheden 408765 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-05-28T18:45:48Z | 2022-05-28T18:45:48Z | NONE | I think it would be great if the Datasette metadata would allow the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1750/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1251739062 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5KnAW2 | 1752 | Research if I can drop Janus | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-05-28T22:46:52Z | 2022-05-28T22:46:52Z | OWNER |
Comment here: https://lobste.rs/s/fki4tj/architecture_notes_datasette#c_a2ihon |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1752/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1266207143 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5LeMmn | 1755 | Gunicorn | ar-jan 1176293 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-06-09T14:18:46Z | 2022-06-09T14:18:46Z | NONE | I've read issue #514 which resulted in running Datasette via systemd as recommended approach. We've also adopted this (for now), but I notice that Uvicorn says the following:
We usually deploy Python applications via Gunicorn for these process management features (e.g. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1755/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1266329095 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5LeqYH | 1756 | Mechanism for creating databases in WAL mode | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-06-09T15:39:28Z | 2022-06-09T15:39:28Z | OWNER | The It turns out WAL mode is useful for databases that are accepting writes! I think a |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1756/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1280799259 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5MV3Ib | 1761 | ensure_ascii=False | mustafa0x 1473102 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-06-22T19:58:13Z | 2022-06-22T19:58:30Z | NONE | Hi, thanks for the project! For the JSON output, I would consider defaulting to |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1761/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1307359454 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c47iWbd | 1772 | Convert to setup.cfg | kfdm 89725 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-07-18T03:39:53Z | 2022-07-18T03:39:53Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1772 | Recent versions of setuptools can run most things from setup.cfg so one can have a simpler version that does not require executing code on install. The bulk of the changes were automated by running https://pypi.org/project/setup-py-upgrade/ with a few minor edits for the bits that it can not auto convert (the initial |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1772/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
1323332006 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5O4HGm | 1774 | Request of feature for mongo | johnfelipe 428820 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-07-31T01:00:05Z | 2022-07-31T01:00:05Z | NONE | Will love if can we use datasette for mongo and all pipelines and workflows |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1774/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1340900019 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5P7IKz | 1785 | Can't use cog menu to facet by first column in a view | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-08-16T21:27:23Z | 2022-08-16T21:27:23Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/paginated_view Compare with: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1785/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1345561209 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5QM6J5 | 1790 | A better HTML title for canned query pages | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-08-21T18:27:46Z | 2022-08-21T18:27:46Z | OWNER | https://scotrail.datasette.io/scotrail/assemble_sentence?terms=This+train+is+formed+of%2Cbomb+which Current title is:
I think a better title would be:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1790/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1353088849 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Qpn9R | 1795 | Consider automatically cleaning up curly quotes in searches | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-08-27T16:35:25Z | 2022-08-27T16:35:25Z | OWNER | If your phone helpfully adds curly quotes for you then phrase searches against FTS won't work: “Rebecca Sugar” In regular (not |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1795/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1365741480 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5RZ4-o | 1806 | UX to recover from Error 500: "You can only execute one statement at a time." | jieter 1470389 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-09-08T08:01:27Z | 2022-09-08T08:01:37Z | NONE | When using the Custom SQL query view, when accidentally adding a semicolon in the middle of my query, datasette errors with:
The error view doesn't contain the query textarea anymore, so it provides no easy way recover from the error. It would be nice if I could change and submit it again. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1806/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
1375792876 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5SAO7s | 1811 | Drop-down menu with "REGEXP" choice | CharlesNepote 562352 | open | 0 | 0 | 2022-09-16T11:06:18Z | 2022-09-16T15:30:31Z | NONE | Drop-down menu below could add "REGEXP" choice when REGEXP sqlite extension is installed and used Not sure. Close the issue if you don't find it relevant. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1811/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);