issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "OWNER" and "created_at" is on date 2021-08-25 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: updated_at (date)

user 1

author_association 1

  • OWNER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
905900807 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/859#issuecomment-905900807 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/859 IC_kwDOBm6k_c41_vMH simonw 9599 2021-08-25T21:51:10Z 2021-08-25T21:51:10Z OWNER

10-20 minutes to populate _internal! How many databases and tables is that for?

I may have to rethink the _internal mechanism entirely. One possible alternative would be for the Datasette homepage to just show a list of available databases (maybe only if there are more than X connected) and then load in their metadata only the first time they are accessed.

I need to get my own stress testing rig setup for this.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Database page loads too slowly with many large tables (due to table counts) 642572841  
905886797 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/323#issuecomment-905886797 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/323 IC_kwDOCGYnMM41_rxN simonw 9599 2021-08-25T21:25:18Z 2021-08-25T21:25:18Z OWNER

As far as I can tell the Python sqlite3 module doesn't actually have a mechanism for de-registering a custom SQL function.

This means that if I implement a mechanism whereby each call to .convert() registers a new SQL function with a random suffix (convert_value_23424() for example) those functions will stay registered - and if .convert() is called a large number of times the number of obsolete custom function registrations will grow without bounds.

For that reason, I'm going to wontfix this issue.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 `table.convert()` method should clean up after itself 979627285  
905097468 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1447#issuecomment-905097468 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1447 IC_kwDOBm6k_c418rD8 simonw 9599 2021-08-25T01:28:53Z 2021-08-25T01:28:53Z OWNER

Good catch, thanks!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Remove underscore from search mode parameter name 978614898  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);