issue_comments
9 rows where "created_at" is on date 2021-12-10, reactions = "{"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0}" and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date)
user 1
- simonw · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
991381679 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353#issuecomment-991381679 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47F0iv | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T23:58:43Z | 2021-12-10T23:59:35Z | OWNER | I think the fix for this is to change the rules about what code is accepted in both the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow passing a file of code to "sqlite-utils convert" 1077102934 | |
991381281 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353#issuecomment-991381281 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47F0ch | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T23:57:26Z | 2021-12-10T23:57:26Z | OWNER | My first attempt at building this looked a little bit strange, because you would end up having a file like this
But... that It would be better if you could write |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow passing a file of code to "sqlite-utils convert" 1077102934 | |
991377288 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353#issuecomment-991377288 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47FzeI | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T23:45:53Z | 2021-12-10T23:45:53Z | OWNER | One challenge here: the current signature looks like this:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow passing a file of code to "sqlite-utils convert" 1077102934 | |
991376639 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353#issuecomment-991376639 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/353 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47FzT_ | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T23:43:45Z | 2021-12-10T23:43:45Z | OWNER | There's a very non-obvious workaround for this at the moment. You can save your code in e.g. a file called
That Now that I've written this down, it's obviously bad! I think your suggestion here is a good idea. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow passing a file of code to "sqlite-utils convert" 1077102934 | |
991309759 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354#issuecomment-991309759 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47Fi-_ | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T21:33:18Z | 2021-12-10T21:33:18Z | OWNER | https://www.sqlite.org/fts5.html#the_rebuild_command says:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failure in test_rebuild_fts 1077243232 | |
991309002 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354#issuecomment-991309002 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47FizK | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T21:32:14Z | 2021-12-10T21:32:14Z | OWNER | Here's what the method does: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/e328db8eba1fbf29a69eda95dfec861954f9e771/sqlite_utils/db.py#L1941-L1952 Maybe I don't need a test that deliberately corrupts the database here? Not sure how to test that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failure in test_rebuild_fts 1077243232 | |
991307422 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354#issuecomment-991307422 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47Fiae | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T21:29:34Z | 2021-12-10T21:29:34Z | OWNER | Here's the test in question. The way it works is a bit weird (deleting everything in the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failure in test_rebuild_fts 1077243232 | |
991306712 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354#issuecomment-991306712 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/354 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM47FiPY | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T21:28:27Z | 2021-12-10T21:28:27Z | OWNER | Failures started with this commit, which only touches documentation so is completely unrelated: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/commit/e328db8eba1fbf29a69eda95dfec861954f9e771 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failure in test_rebuild_fts 1077243232 | |
991285527 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1518#issuecomment-991285527 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1518 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47FdEX | simonw 9599 | 2021-12-10T20:52:00Z | 2021-12-10T20:52:00Z | OWNER | If I break this up into
Are there any plugin hooks that would make sense to execute in parallel? Actually there might be: I don't think |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Complete refactor of TableView and table.html template 1058072543 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3