issues
555 rows where repo = 107914493 and state = "open" sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
834602299 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MzQ2MDIyOTk= | 1262 | Plugin hook that could support 'order by random()' for table view | henry501 19328961 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-03-18T10:02:01Z | 2021-03-18T17:55:01Z | NONE | I am frequently using Datasette to quickly get a visual impression for a table without reviewing it in its entirety. Because I have some groups of similar records, the default sorting options mean that each page is very similar and not representative of the full dataset. The current interface allows sorting by columns, but random sorting is only available via custom SQL. Maybe this could be a button or link. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1262/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
787173276 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODcxNzMyNzY= | 1193 | Research plugin hook for alternative database backends | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-01-15T20:27:50Z | 2021-03-12T01:01:54Z | OWNER | I started exploring what Datasette would like running against PostgreSQL in #670 and @dazzag24 did some work on Parquet described in #657. I had initially thought this was WAY too much additional complexity, but I'm beginning to think that the A bigger issue is SQL generation, but I realized that most of Datasette's SQL generation code exists just in the Very unlikely for this to make it into Datasette 1.0, but maybe this would be the defining feature of Datasette 2.0? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1193/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
824750134 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MjQ3NTAxMzQ= | 1251 | facet option not appearing when table is big | verajosemanuel 15836677 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-03-08T16:54:04Z | 2021-03-08T16:54:16Z | NONE | I have a big table with more than 500.000 rows. Trying to facet by one of my columns, the options are not available as for the other smaller tables. I have tried to set it in URL as:
to no avail. is there any limit? how can I force the option "facet" to appear for big tables? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1251/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
617323873 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTczMjM4NzM= | 766 | Enable wildcard-searches by default | clausjuhl 2181410 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-05-13T10:14:48Z | 2021-03-05T16:35:21Z | NONE | Hi Simon. It seems that datasette currently has wildcard-searches disabled by default (along with the boolean search-options, NEAR-queries and more, and despite the docs). If I try out the search-url provided in the docs (https://fara.datasettes.com/fara/FARA_All_ShortForms?_search=manafort), it does not handle wildcard-searches, and I'm unable to make it work on my datasette-instance. I would argue that wildcard-searches is such a standard query, that it should be enabled by default. Requiring "_searchmode=raw" when using prefix-searches seems unnecessary. Plus: What happens to non-ascii searches when using "_searchmode=raw"? Is the "escape_fts"-function from datasette.utils ignored? Thanks! /Claus |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/766/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
803356942 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MDMzNTY5NDI= | 1218 | /usr/local/opt/python3/bin/python3.6: bad interpreter: No such file or directory | robmarkcole 11855322 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-02-08T09:07:00Z | 2021-02-23T12:12:17Z | NONE | Error as above, however I do have python3.8 and the readme indicates this is supported. ``` (venv) (base) Robins-MacBook:datasette robin$ ls /usr/local/opt/python3/bin/ .. pip3 python3 python3.8 ``` |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1218/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
811505638 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTE1MDU2Mzg= | 1234 | Runtime support for ATTACHing multiple databases | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-02-18T22:06:47Z | 2021-02-22T21:06:28Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/283#issuecomment-781665560 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1234/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
811458446 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTE0NTg0NDY= | 1233 | "datasette publish cloudrun" cannot publish files with spaces in their name | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-02-18T21:08:31Z | 2021-02-18T21:10:08Z | OWNER | Got this error: ``` Step 6/9 : RUN datasette inspect fixtures.db extra database.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json ---> Running in db9da0068592 Usage: datasette inspect [OPTIONS] [FILES]... Try 'datasette inspect --help' for help. Error: Invalid value for '[FILES]...': Path 'extra' does not exist.
The command '/bin/sh -c datasette inspect fixtures.db extra database.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json' returned a non-zero code: 2
ERROR
ERROR: build step 0 "gcr.io/cloud-builders/docker" failed: step exited with non-zero status: 2
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1233/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
811054000 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTEwNTQwMDA= | 1230 | Vega charts are plotted only for rows on the visible page, cluster maps only for rows in the remaining pages | Kabouik 7107523 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-02-18T12:27:02Z | 2021-02-18T15:22:15Z | NONE | I filtered a data set on some criteria and obtain 265 results, split over three pages (100, 100, 65), and reazlized that Vega plots are only applied to the results displayed on the current page, instead of the whole filtered data, e.g., 100 on page 1, 100 on page 2, 65 on page 3. Is there a way to force the graphs to consider all results instead of just the page, considering that pages rarely represent sensible information? Likewise, while the cluster map does show all results on the first page, if you go to next pages, it will show all remaining results except the previous page(s), e.g., 265 on page 1, 165 on page 2, 65 on page 3. In both cases, I don't see many situations where one would like to represent the data this way, and it might even lead to interpretation errors when viewing the data. Am I missing some cases where this would be best? Perhaps a clickable option to subset visual representations according visible pages vs. display all search results would do? [Edit] Oh, I just saw the "Load all" button under the cluster map as well as the setting to alter the max number or results. So I guess this issue only is about the Vega charts. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | |||||||||
808771690 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MDg3NzE2OTA= | 1225 | More flexible formatting of records with CSS grid | mhalle 649467 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-02-15T19:28:17Z | 2021-02-15T19:28:35Z | NONE | In several applications I've been experimenting with alternate formatting of datasette query results. Lately I've found that CSS grids work very well and seem quite general for formatting rows. In CSS I use grid templates to define the layout of each record and the regions for each field, hiding the fields I don't want. It's pretty flexible and looks good. It's also a great basis for highly responsive layout. I initially thought I'd only use this feature for record detail views, but now I use it for index views as well. However, there are some limitations:
* With the existing table templates, it seems that you can change the It would be helpful to at least have an official example or test that used a grid layout for records to make sure nothing in datasette breaks with it. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1225/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
792890765 | MDU6SXNzdWU3OTI4OTA3NjU= | 1200 | ?_size=10 option for the arbitrary query page would be useful | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-01-24T20:55:35Z | 2021-02-11T03:13:59Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select+*+from+compound_three_primary_keys&_size=10 - Would also be good if it persisted in a hidden form field. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1200/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
803929694 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MDM5Mjk2OTQ= | 1219 | Try profiling Datasette using scalene | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-02-08T20:37:06Z | 2021-02-08T22:13:00Z | OWNER | https://github.com/emeryberger/scalene looks like an interesting profiling tool. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1219/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
799663959 | MDU6SXNzdWU3OTk2NjM5NTk= | 1213 | gzip support for HTML (and JSON) responses | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2021-02-02T20:36:28Z | 2021-02-02T20:41:55Z | OWNER | This page https://datasette-tiles-demo.datasette.io/San_Francisco/tiles is 2MB because of all of the base64 images. Gzipped it's 1.5MB. Since Datasette is usually deployed without a frontend gzipping proxy, Datasette itself needs to solve for this. Gzipping everything won't work because some endpoints - the all-rows CSV endpoint and the download-database endpoint - are streaming and hence can't be buffered-and-gzipped. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1213/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
795367402 | MDU6SXNzdWU3OTUzNjc0MDI= | 1209 | v0.54 500 error from sql query in custom template; code worked in v0.53; found a workaround | jrdmb 11788561 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-01-27T19:08:13Z | 2021-01-28T23:00:27Z | NONE | v0.54 500 error in sql query template; code worked in v0.53; found a workaround schema: Live example of correctly rendered template in v.053: https://cosmotalks-cy6xkkbezq-uw.a.run.app/cosmotalks/talks/1 Description of problem: I needed 'sql select' code in a custom row-mydatabase-mytable.html template to lookup the series name for a foreign key integer value in the talks table. So The code below worked perfectly in v0.53 (just the relevant sql statement part is shown; full code is here):
In v0.54, that code resulted in a 500 error with a 'no such table series' message. A second query in that template also did not work but the above is fully illustrative of the problem. All templates were up-to-date along with datasette v0.54. Workaround: After fiddling around with trying different things, what worked was the syntax from Querying a different database from the datasette-template-sql github repo to add the database name to the sql statement:
Though this was found to work, it should not be necessary to add |
datasette 107914493 | issue | |||||||||
714377268 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTQzNzcyNjg= | 991 | Redesign application homepage | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-10-04T18:48:45Z | 2021-01-26T19:06:36Z | OWNER | Most Datasette instances only host a single database, but the current homepage design assumes that it should leave plenty of space for multiple databases: Reconsider this design - should the default show more information? The Covid-19 Datasette homepage looks particularly sparse I think: https://covid-19.datasettes.com/ |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/991/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
780278550 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODAyNzg1NTA= | 1179 | Make original path available to render hooks | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 8 | 2021-01-06T08:31:45Z | 2021-01-25T04:44:33Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette-export-notebook/blob/0.1/datasette_export_notebook/init.py
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1179/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
712260429 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTIyNjA0Mjk= | 983 | JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 47 | 2020-09-30T20:32:43Z | 2021-01-25T04:43:58Z | OWNER |
Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/981#issuecomment-701616922 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
789336592 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODkzMzY1OTI= | 1195 | view_name = "query" for the query page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2021-01-19T20:21:36Z | 2021-01-25T04:40:08Z | OWNER | It uses |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1195/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
712984738 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTI5ODQ3Mzg= | 987 | Documented HTML hooks for JavaScript plugin authors | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 7 | 2020-10-01T16:10:14Z | 2021-01-25T04:00:03Z | OWNER | In #981 I added |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/987/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
548591089 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NDg1OTEwODk= | 657 | Allow creation of virtual tables at startup | dazzag24 1055831 | open | 0 | 4 | 2020-01-12T16:10:55Z | 2021-01-15T20:24:35Z | NONE | Hi, I've been experimenting with SQLite reading from huge datasets using this excellent Parquet extension from @cldellow. https://cldellow.com/2018/06/22/sqlite-parquet-vtable.html https://github.com/cldellow/sqlite-parquet-vtable This works really well, but I was keen to see if I could combine datasette with this. Having previously experimented with the spatialite extension I knew that datasette supports loading extensions in the underlying sqlite instance. However I hit a blocker as the current design only allows SELECT statements to be executed and so I am unable to execute the crucial CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE ......... command that is required to load the data from the parquet file into the table. It seems like this would be a simple-ish change, but I don't know enough about the architecture of datasette to start implementing this myself? Could this be done as a datasette plugin? or would this require more fundamental changes at initialisation time? My thoughts are that something at init time could detect that the user was loading a .parquet file and then switch to a mode were it loads that via the "CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE..." rather than loading the .db file in the default case?? I'm happy to contribute code and testing, I just need some pointers on the best approach. Thanks Darren |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/657/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
787104850 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODcxMDQ4NTA= | 1192 | Form Plugin for in-depth Datasette Querying | tomershvueli 1024355 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-01-15T18:24:50Z | 2021-01-15T18:24:50Z | NONE | I envision a sort of easy-to-build form plugin that would be able to map a user's inputs to different fields/columns in a Datasette database. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1192/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
782708469 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODI3MDg0Njk= | 1183 | Take advantage of sqlite-utils cached table counts, if available | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-01-09T23:51:48Z | 2021-01-12T02:42:08Z | OWNER | sqlite-utils 3.2 now has a mechanism for creating a https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/python-api.html#cached-table-counts-using-triggers |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1183/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
778450486 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Nzg0NTA0ODY= | 1171 | GitHub Actions workflow to build and sign macOS binary executables | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 8 | 2021-01-04T23:36:59Z | 2021-01-07T19:36:00Z | OWNER | Using PyInstaller, as explored in #93 and https://til.simonwillison.net/python/packaging-pyinstaller The bigger challenge will be the code signing bit. I'll need a Apple Developer account ($99/year) and some extensive CI fiddling. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1171/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
780767542 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODA3Njc1NDI= | 1180 | Lazily evaluated arguments for call_with_supported_arguments | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2021-01-06T18:43:34Z | 2021-01-07T18:56:24Z | OWNER | While building https://github.com/simonw/datasette-export-notebook I thought it would be nice to be able to show a count of exported records on the page "This will stream 10,422 records to your notebook". None of the documented arguments on https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.53/plugin_hooks.html#register-output-renderer-datasette expose the count. The closest is So, idea: if your defined render function takes a To implement this I would need to teach the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1180/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
778682317 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Nzg2ODIzMTc= | 1173 | GitHub Actions workflow to build manylinux binary | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-01-05T07:41:11Z | 2021-01-05T07:41:43Z | OWNER | Refs #1171 and #93 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1173/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
778530523 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Nzg1MzA1MjM= | 1172 | /-/static should be excluded from auth and permission checks | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2021-01-05T02:53:41Z | 2021-01-05T02:53:41Z | OWNER | I want to set far future / immutable cache headers on everything served from This has security implications since it will be possible to see what plugins are installed by checking for known static URLs. I'm fine with that - performance is more important here. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1172/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
670209331 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NzAyMDkzMzE= | 913 | Mechanism for passing additional options to `datasette my.db` that affect plugins | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2020-07-31T20:38:26Z | 2021-01-04T20:04:11Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/913/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
751195017 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTExOTUwMTc= | 1111 | Accessing a database's `.json` is slow for very large SQLite files | asg017 15178711 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-11-26T00:27:27Z | 2021-01-04T19:57:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have a SQLite DB that's pretty large, 23GB and something like 300 million rows. I expect that most queries I run on it will be slow, which is fine, but there are some things that Datasette does that makes working with the DB very slow. Specifically, when I access the
I suspect this is because a ```bash $ time sqlite3 out.db < <(echo "select count(*) from PageviewsHour;") 362794272 real 0m44.523s user 0m2.497s sys 0m6.703s ``` I'm using the
More than happy to debug further, or send a PR if you like one of the proposals above! |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1111/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
776101101 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NzYxMDExMDE= | 1161 | Update a whole bunch of links to datasette.io instead of datasette.readthedocs.io | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-12-29T21:47:31Z | 2020-12-29T21:49:57Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1161/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
421546944 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MjE1NDY5NDQ= | 417 | Datasette Library | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 12 | 2019-03-15T14:30:22Z | 2020-12-29T14:34:50Z | OWNER | The ability to run Datasette in a mode where it automatically picks up new (or modified) files in a directory tree without needing to restart the server. Suggested command:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/417/reactions", "total_count": 8, "+1": 8, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
567902704 | MDU6SXNzdWU1Njc5MDI3MDQ= | 675 | --cp option for datasette publish and datasette package for shipping additional files and directories | aviflax 141844 | open | 0 | 12 | 2020-02-19T22:55:56Z | 2020-12-28T18:49:21Z | NONE | I’m working on integrating Datasette into a documentation-oriented publishing workflow internally in my company, and in order to deploy the Docker image created by So it’d be excellent if there was an additional option for this command, something like, like, I’d envision it looking something like:
I’d be happy to help design, specify, implement, and test this feature, if you’d be interested. Thanks for the fantastic tools! |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/675/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
443021509 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDMwMjE1MDk= | 461 | Paginate + search for databases/tables on the homepage | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-05-11T18:05:34Z | 2020-12-17T22:14:46Z | OWNER | Split out from #460 - in order to support large numbers of connected databases the homepage needs to be paginated. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/461/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
750089847 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTAwODk4NDc= | 1109 | Deprecate --config in Datasette 1.0 (in favour of --setting) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-11-24T21:43:57Z | 2020-12-17T22:07:49Z | OWNER | I added a deprecation warning to this in #992. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1109/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
634663505 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzQ2NjM1MDU= | 815 | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 8 | 2020-06-08T14:25:23Z | 2020-12-17T22:06:48Z | OWNER | Now that we're making a LOT more permission checks (on the DB index page we do a check for every listed table for example) the Can make this more readable by grouping permission checks by request. Have most recent request at the top of the page but the permission requests within that page sorted chronologically by most recent last. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
450032134 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTAwMzIxMzQ= | 495 | facet_m2m gets confused by multiple relationships | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-05-29T21:37:28Z | 2020-12-17T05:08:22Z | OWNER | I got this for a database I was playing with: I think this is because of these three tables: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/495/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
463492815 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjM0OTI4MTU= | 534 | 500 error on m2m facet detection | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-07-03T00:42:42Z | 2020-12-17T05:08:22Z | OWNER | This may help debug:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/534/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
718395987 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTAwNzk4MDkx | 1008 | Add json_loads and json_dumps jinja2 filters | mhalle 649467 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-10-09T20:11:34Z | 2020-12-15T02:30:28Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1008 | datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1008/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | |||||||
765637324 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NjU2MzczMjQ= | 1144 | JavaScript to help plugins interact with the fragment part of the URL | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-12-13T20:36:06Z | 2020-12-14T14:47:11Z | OWNER | Suggested by Markus Holtermann on Twitter, who is building https://github.com/MarkusH/datasette-chartjs
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1144/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
309047460 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMDkwNDc0NjA= | 188 | Ability to bundle metadata and templates inside the SQLite file | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2018-03-27T16:42:07Z | 2020-12-04T17:18:34Z | OWNER | One of the nicest qualities of SQLite as a data format is that you get a single file which you can then backup or share with other people. Datasette breaks this a little once you start including custom metadata.json or template files and CSS. It would be cool if there was an optional mechanism for baking that extra configuration into the SQLite file itself. That way entire datasette mini-applications (including canned queries and custom HTML and CSS) could be constructed as single .db files. Since datasette configuration is all file-based, one way to achieve that would be to support a "datasette_files" table which, if present is used to search for file contents by path. This is inline with the philosophy described by https://www.sqlite.org/appfileformat.html |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/188/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
756875827 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTY4NzU4Mjc= | 1129 | Fix footer to the bottom of the page | abdusco 3243482 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-12-04T07:28:07Z | 2020-12-04T16:04:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Footer doesn't stick to the bottom if the body content isn't long enough to reach the end of viewport. This can be fixed using flexbox. ```css body { min-height: 100vh; display: flex; flex-direction: column; } .content { flex-grow: 1; } ``` |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1129/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
346026869 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDYwMjY4Njk= | 354 | Handle many-to-many relationships | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2018-07-31T04:03:13Z | 2020-11-24T19:51:18Z | OWNER | This is a master tracking ticket for various many-2-many features. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/354/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
735852274 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MzU4NTIyNzQ= | 1082 | DigitalOcean buildpack memory errors for large sqlite db? | justmars 39538958 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-11-04T06:35:32Z | 2020-11-04T19:35:44Z | NONE |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1082/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
352768017 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNTI3NjgwMTc= | 362 | Add option to include/exclude columns in search filters | annapowellsmith 78156 | open | 0 | 1 | 2018-08-22T01:32:08Z | 2020-11-03T19:01:59Z | NONE | I have a dataset with many columns, of which only some are likely to be of interest for searching. It would be great for usability if the search filters in the UI could be configured to include/exclude columns. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/362/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
426722204 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MjY3MjIyMDQ= | 423 | ?_search_col=X not reflected correctly in the UI | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-03-28T21:48:19Z | 2020-11-03T19:01:59Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/423/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
730210880 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MzAyMTA4ODA= | 1055 | query.html and table.html should share the same table implementation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-10-27T07:58:21Z | 2020-10-27T07:58:29Z | OWNER | In #998 I made a change that affected the table page but didn't affect the query page because I incorrectly assumed they shared rendering logic. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1055/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
721068929 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjEwNjg5Mjk= | 1020 | Method for datasette.client() to forward on authentication | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 6 | 2020-10-14T01:47:49Z | 2020-10-19T22:45:01Z | OWNER | I stumbled into this while working on Dogsheep Beta: the requests it re-dispatched through https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/blob/bed9df2b3ef68189e2e445427721a28f4e9b4887/dogsheep_beta/init.py#L223-L231 This made me think that |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1020/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
724878151 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MjQ4NzgxNTE= | 1032 | Bring date parsing into Datasette core | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 8 | 2020-10-19T18:30:45Z | 2020-10-19T19:37:55Z | OWNER | Currently this is mainly handled by a plugin - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-dateutil - but I realise now that this really needs to be core functionality. See also Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1318234808653213696 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1032/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
723982480 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTA1NDUzOTAw | 1030 | Make `package` command deal with a configuration directory argument | frankier 299380 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-10-18T11:07:02Z | 2020-10-19T08:01:51Z | FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1030 | Currently if we run |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1030/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
718910318 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5MTAzMTg= | 1015 | Research: could Datasette install its own plugins? | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-10-11T19:33:06Z | 2020-10-11T19:35:04Z | OWNER | It would be cool if Datasette could offer a plugin browsing interface where users could install plugins by clicking "Install" on them - similar to how VS Code extensions work. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1015/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
628572716 | MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjg1NzI3MTY= | 791 | Tutorial: building a something-interesting with writable canned queries | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-06-01T16:32:05Z | 2020-10-10T23:34:42Z | OWNER | Initial idea: TODO list, as a tutorial for #698 writable canned queries. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/791/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
718238967 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTgyMzg5Njc= | 1003 | from_json jinja2 filter | mhalle 649467 | open | 0 | 4 | 2020-10-09T15:30:58Z | 2020-10-09T17:17:07Z | NONE | When JSON fields are rendered in a jinja2 template, it is handy to be able to manipulate them as data (e.g., iterate over an array of values). Ansible has a "from_json" function, which just called json.loads. It's a trivial as a datasette plugin, but it seems generally useful. Does it makes sense to add it directly into the app? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1003/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
718272593 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTgyNzI1OTM= | 1007 | set-env and add-path commands have been deprecated | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-10-09T16:21:18Z | 2020-10-09T16:23:51Z | OWNER | https://github.blog/changelog/2020-10-01-github-actions-deprecating-set-env-and-add-path-commands/
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1007/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
626211658 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjYyMTE2NTg= | 778 | Ability to configure keyset pagination for views and queries | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-05-28T04:48:56Z | 2020-10-02T02:26:25Z | OWNER | Currently views offer pagination, but it uses offset/limit - e.g. https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/paginated_view?_next=100 This means pagination will perform poorly on deeper pages. If a view is based on a table that has a primary key it should be possible to configure efficient keyset pagination that works the same way that table pagination works. This may be as simple as configuring a column that can be treated as a "primary key" for the purpose of pagination using |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/778/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
712368432 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTIzNjg0MzI= | 984 | Review accessibility of new column action menus | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-09-30T23:56:44Z | 2020-10-01T00:01:36Z | OWNER | Feature added in #981 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/984/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
455852801 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTU4NTI4MDE= | 507 | Every datasette plugin on the ecosystem page should have a screenshot | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2019-06-13T17:02:51Z | 2020-09-17T02:47:35Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/507/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
649429772 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDk0Mjk3NzI= | 886 | Reconsider how _actor_X magic parameter deals with missing values | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-07-02T00:00:38Z | 2020-09-11T21:35:26Z | OWNER | I had to build a custom @hookimpl
def register_magic_parameters():
return [
("actorornull", actorornull),
]
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/886/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
696908389 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTY5MDgzODk= | 961 | Verification checks for metadata.json on startup | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-09-09T15:21:53Z | 2020-09-09T15:24:31Z | OWNER | I lost a bunch of time yesterday trying to figure out why a Datasette instance wasn't starting up - it turned out it was because I had a Catching these on startup would be good. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/961/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
691537426 | MDU6SXNzdWU2OTE1Mzc0MjY= | 959 | Internals API idea: results.dicts in addition to results.rows | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-09-03T00:50:17Z | 2020-09-03T00:50:17Z | OWNER | I just wrote this code:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/959/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
687694947 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODc2OTQ5NDc= | 954 | Remove old register_output_renderer dict mechanism in Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2020-08-28T04:04:23Z | 2020-08-28T04:56:31Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/954/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
647095487 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDcwOTU0ODc= | 873 | "datasette -p 0 --root" gives the wrong URL | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 14 | 2020-06-29T04:03:06Z | 2020-08-18T17:26:10Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/873/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
675594325 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NzU1OTQzMjU= | 917 | Idea: "datasette publish" option for "only if the data has changed | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-08-08T21:58:27Z | 2020-08-08T21:58:27Z | OWNER | This is a pattern I often find myself needing. I usually implement this in GitHub Actions like this:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/917/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
668064026 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NjgwNjQwMjY= | 911 | Rethink the --name option to "datasette publish" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-07-29T18:49:49Z | 2020-07-29T18:49:49Z | OWNER |
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/911/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
659873662 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NTk4NzM2NjI= | 898 | datasette.utils.testing module | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-07-18T03:53:24Z | 2020-07-18T03:57:46Z | OWNER | The unit tests for plugins could benefit from reusing code from Datasette's own testing fixtures, e.g.:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/898/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
648749062 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDQyNTA1MDg4 | 883 | Skip counting hidden tables | abdusco 3243482 | open | 0 | 4 | 2020-07-01T07:38:08Z | 2020-07-02T00:25:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/883 | Potential fix for https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/859. Disabling table counts for hidden tables speeds up database page quite a bit. In my setup it reduced load time by 2/3 (~300 -> ~90ms) |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/883/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
632724154 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzI3MjQxNTQ= | 805 | Writable canned queries live demo on Glitch | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 11 | 2020-06-06T20:52:13Z | 2020-07-01T22:44:01Z | OWNER | Needs to run somewhere with a mutable disk drive, so not Cloud Run or Heroku or Vercel. I think I'll put it on Glitch. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/805/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
648659536 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDg2NTk1MzY= | 881 | Figure out why restore_working_directory is needed in some places | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-07-01T04:19:25Z | 2020-07-01T04:19:25Z | OWNER | This is a frustrating workaround. I have a /usr/local/opt/python/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/contextlib.py:112: in enter return next(self.gen) self = <click.testing.CliRunner object at 0x1135ad110>
I'd like to not have to do this. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/881/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
643510821 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDM1MTA4MjE= | 862 | Set an upper limit on total facet suggestion time for a page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-06-23T03:57:55Z | 2020-06-23T03:58:48Z | OWNER | If a table has 100 columns the facet suggestion code will currently run 100 times, taking a max of So for 100 columns, that's 100 * 50ms = 5s total time that might be spent attempting to calculate facets on a large table! I should implement a hard upper limit on the total amount of time taken suggesting facets - probably of around 500ms. If it takes longer than that the remaining columns will not be considered. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/862/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
348043884 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNDgwNDM4ODQ= | 357 | Plugin hook for loading metadata.json | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 6 | 2018-08-06T19:00:01Z | 2020-06-21T22:19:58Z | OWNER | For https://github.com/simonw/russian-ira-facebook-ads-datasette/tree/af6d956995e14afd585c35a6a06bb01da32043ba I wrote a script to convert YAML to JSON because YAML is a better format for embedding multi-line HTML descriptions and canned SQL statements. Example yaml metadata file: https://github.com/simonw/russian-ira-facebook-ads-datasette/blob/af6d956995e14afd585c35a6a06bb01da32043ba/russian-ads-metadata.yaml It would be useful if Datasette could be fed a YAML file directly:
Question is... should this be a native feature (hence adding a YAML dependency) or should it be handled by a |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/357/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
639993467 | MDU6SXNzdWU2Mzk5OTM0Njc= | 850 | Proof of concept for Datasette on AWS Lambda with EFS | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 25 | 2020-06-16T21:48:31Z | 2020-06-16T23:52:16Z | OWNER | If Datasette can run on Lambda with access to EFS it could both read AND write large databases there. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/850/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
574021194 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzQwMjExOTQ= | 691 | --reload sould reload server if code in --plugins-dir changes | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-03-02T14:42:21Z | 2020-06-14T02:35:17Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/691/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
638238548 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzgyMzg1NDg= | 845 | Code coverage should ignore files in .coveragerc | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-06-13T21:45:42Z | 2020-06-13T21:46:03Z | OWNER | I'm not sure why this is, but the code coverage I have running in a GitHub Action doesn't take my Here's the bit that's ignored: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cf7a2bdb404734910ec07abc7571351a2d934828/.coveragerc#L1-L2 As a result my coverage score is 84%, when it should be 92%:
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/845/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
628156527 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjgxNTY1Mjc= | 789 | Mechanism for enabling pluggy tracing | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-06-01T05:10:14Z | 2020-06-01T05:11:03Z | OWNER | Could be useful for debugging plugins: https://pluggy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#call-tracing I tried this out by adding these two lines in Added these:pm.trace.root.setwriter(print)
pm.enable_tracing()
finish actor_from_request --> [] [hook] extra_body_script [hook] template: show_json.html database: None table: None view_name: json_data datasette: <datasette.app.Datasette object at 0x106277ad0> finish extra_body_script --> [] [hook] extra_template_vars [hook] template: show_json.html database: None table: None view_name: json_data request: <datasette.utils.asgi.Request object at 0x1065504d0> datasette: <datasette.app.Datasette object at 0x106277ad0> finish extra_template_vars --> [] [hook] extra_css_urls [hook] template: show_json.html database: None table: None datasette: <datasette.app.Datasette object at 0x106277ad0> finish extra_css_urls --> [] [hook] extra_js_urls [hook] template: show_json.html database: None table: None datasette: <datasette.app.Datasette object at 0x106277ad0> finish extra_js_urls --> [] [hook] INFO: 127.0.0.1:52724 - "GET /-/actor HTTP/1.1" 200 OK actor_from_request [hook] datasette: <datasette.app.Datasette object at 0x106277ad0> request: <datasette.utils.asgi.Request object at 0x1065500d0> finish actor_from_request --> [] [hook] ``` |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/789/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
374953006 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNzQ5NTMwMDY= | 369 | Interface should show same JSON shape options for custom SQL queries | gfrmin 416374 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2018-10-29T10:39:15Z | 2020-05-30T17:24:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | At the moment the page returning a custom SQL query shows the JSON and CSV APIs, but not the multiple JSON shapes. However, adding the |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/369/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
626582657 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjY1ODI2NTc= | 779 | Make human_description_en explicitly available to output renderers | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-05-28T14:59:54Z | 2020-05-28T14:59:54Z | OWNER |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette-atom/blob/df98a6c43a443224b6cd232f84703ec297ef046b/datasette_atom/init.py#L36-L37
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/779/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
612382643 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTIzODI2NDM= | 758 | Question: Access to immutable database-path | clausjuhl 2181410 | open | 0 | 6 | 2020-05-05T07:01:18Z | 2020-05-28T08:23:27Z | NONE | Hi Simon Is there anywhere in the app-context where one can access the hashed urlpath of the database? Currently it's included in the template-context ( |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/758/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
616087149 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTYwODcxNDk= | 765 | publish heroku should default to currently tagged version | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-05-11T18:24:06Z | 2020-05-11T18:25:43Z | OWNER | Had a report that deploying to Heroku was using the previously installed version of Datasette, not the latest. Could be because of this: Heroku documentation recommends pinning to specific versions https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-pip So... we could ensure we default to an install value of |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/765/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
613491342 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTM0OTEzNDI= | 762 | Experiment with PRAGMA hard_heap_limit | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-05-06T17:33:23Z | 2020-05-07T03:08:44Z | OWNER | This was added in SQLite 2020-01-22 (3.31.0): https://www.sqlite.org/changes.html#version_3_31_0
This sounds like it could be a nice extra safety measure. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/762/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
613422636 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MTM0MjI2MzY= | 760 | Way of seeing full schema for a database | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2020-05-06T15:46:08Z | 2020-05-06T23:49:06Z | OWNER | I find myself wanting to quickly figure out all of the BLOB columns in a database. A It would need to be carefully constructed from various queries against |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/760/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
285168503 | MDU6SXNzdWUyODUxNjg1MDM= | 176 | Add GraphQL endpoint | yozlet 173848 | open | 0 | 8 | 2017-12-29T23:21:01Z | 2020-04-21T14:16:24Z | NONE | Would make it much easier to build React & similar frontends. Maybe with https://github.com/graphql-python/sanic-graphql ? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/176/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
593006814 | MDU6SXNzdWU1OTMwMDY4MTQ= | 715 | Refactor duplicate cell display logic | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2020-04-03T00:58:11Z | 2020-04-03T00:58:11Z | OWNER | The logic for rendering cells in table view and in database (or canned query) view is currently very similar: Compared with: I'll be changing this a bit in #698 but I should still try to clean this up more further in the future. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/715/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
565064079 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzc1MTgwODMy | 672 | --dirs option for scanning directories for SQLite databases | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 15 | 2020-02-14T02:25:52Z | 2020-03-27T01:03:53Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/672 | Refs #417. |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/672/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
574035432 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzQwMzU0MzI= | 692 | is_hidden_table context variable on table.html page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-03-02T15:03:25Z | 2020-03-02T15:03:48Z | OWNER | It's useful to know if a table is hidden when rendering that page. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/692/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
550293770 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NTAyOTM3NzA= | 658 | How do I use the app.css as style sheet? | null92 49656826 | open | 0 | 2 | 2020-01-15T16:27:57Z | 2020-02-07T00:29:50Z | NONE | Simon, I'm trying to use the app.css (in static folder) as style sheet but the datasette on Heroku simply ignore it! I read everything about customization here and on readthedocs but still can't. Is this possible? Thanks! |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/658/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
559964149 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NTk5NjQxNDk= | 665 | Introduce a SQL statement parser in Python | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2020-02-04T20:36:05Z | 2020-02-04T20:36:48Z | OWNER | 254 and #653 are both examples of problems that could be solved using a real SQL parser in Python. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/665/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
527710055 | MDU6SXNzdWU1Mjc3MTAwNTU= | 640 | Nicer error message for heroku publish name clash | psychemedia 82988 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-11-24T14:57:07Z | 2019-12-06T07:19:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | If you try to publish to Heroku using no set name (i.e. the default
It would be neater if:
It may also be useful to provide a command to list the current names that are being used, which I assume is available via a Heroku call? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/640/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
527670799 | MDU6SXNzdWU1Mjc2NzA3OTk= | 639 | updating metadata.json without recreating the app | pkoppstein 172847 | open | 0 | 6 | 2019-11-24T09:19:53Z | 2019-11-30T06:08:50Z | NONE | I've sucessfully "uploaded" an SQLite database (with a metadata.json file) to heroku using:
The question is: how can I modify the (small) metadata.json file without having to upload the (large) SQLite database. The directions on heroku indicate I should run:
But this just results in an empty directory with a warning: warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository. I've been able to "clone" the heroku "app" using the command:
but this is not a git repository.... Ideally, it seems to me, there'd be an option of the (p.s. I ran (p.p.s. Thanks for Datasette!) |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/639/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
530468212 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MzA0NjgyMTI= | 643 | Set up some basic benchmarks as part of the unit tests | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-11-29T19:24:19Z | 2019-11-29T19:24:19Z | OWNER | https://pypi.org/project/pytest-benchmark/ looks great for this. Here's how to run it as a github action: https://github.com/rhysd/github-action-benchmark/blob/master/examples/pytest/README.md |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/643/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
464987783 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjk1MTI3MjEz | 546 | Facet by delimiter | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-07-07T20:06:05Z | 2019-11-18T23:46:01Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/546 | Refs #510 |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/546/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
501773982 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzIzOTgzNzMy | 579 | New connection pooling | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-10-02T23:22:19Z | 2019-11-15T22:57:21Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/579 | See #569 |
datasette 107914493 | pull | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/579/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0 | ||||||
516874735 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MTY4NzQ3MzU= | 613 | Basic join support for table view | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-11-03T19:12:53Z | 2019-11-03T19:14:01Z | OWNER | I think it would be possible to support basic foreign key joins on the table page. The user could specify columns that should result in a join (from a set of suggestions similar to how facets work right now) and they could then be passed as This feature will make a lot of sense when combined with the ability to show / hide / customize columns, see #292 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/613/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
510076368 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MTAwNzYzNjg= | 605 | Support queries at the table level | bsilverm 12617395 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-10-21T15:58:30Z | 2019-10-30T18:55:37Z | NONE | Per the issue described in issue #588, it was determined queries are not supported at the table level. Per my last comment in the issue, I'd like to request support for this as it would help eliminate errors in the event certain tables are not present in the database. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/605/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
457147936 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTcxNDc5MzY= | 512 | "about" parameter in metadata does not appear when alone | chrismp 7936571 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-06-17T21:04:20Z | 2019-10-11T15:49:13Z | NONE | Here's an example of metadata I have for one database on datasette.
The text in Is this intended? |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/512/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
503053243 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMwNTMyNDM= | 582 | Datasette should not completely crash if one SQLite database is malformed | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 0 | 2019-10-06T05:11:43Z | 2019-10-06T05:11:43Z | OWNER | If you run Datasette against a number of database files and one of them is malformed, you get this 500 error on the index page: It would be better if Datasette still worked and listed the databases that were NOT malformed, then showed an inline error message just for the one that could not be accessed. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/582/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
481885279 | MDU6SXNzdWU0ODE4ODUyNzk= | 569 | More advanced connection pooling | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 4 | 2019-08-17T13:20:41Z | 2019-10-02T22:44:37Z | OWNER | We need a much smarter way of handling database connections. Today, connections are simple: Datasette runs a number of threads (defaults to 3) and each thread gets a threadlocal read-only (or immutable) connection to each attached database - opened on demand. For Datasette Library (#417) I want to support potentially hundreds of attached databases. Datasette Edit (#567) is going to introduce a need for writable connections too. I'd also like to be able to run joins across multiple databases (#283) which further complicates things. Supporting thousands of open SQLite connections at once feels like it won't provide good enough performance (though I should benchmark that to be sure). Some kind of connection pooling is likely to be necessary. |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/569/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
463544206 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjM1NDQyMDY= | 537 | Populate "endpoint" key in ASGI scope | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 12 | 2019-07-03T04:54:47Z | 2019-07-22T06:03:18Z | OWNER | This is a trick used by Starlette so that other layers of ASGI middleware can see which route was selected. They added it here: https://github.com/encode/starlette/commit/34d0097feb6f057bd050d5057df5a2f96b97384e If Datasette supports it as well we can benefit from it if we integrate this sentry_asgi middleware (probably as a |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
465003070 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMDMwNzA= | 551 | Ship many-to-many faceting support (and facet-by-delimiter) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 2 | 2019-07-07T23:11:45Z | 2019-07-08T15:45:23Z | OWNER | datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/551/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||||
456569067 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTY1NjkwNjc= | 510 | Ability to facet by delimiter (e.g. comma separated fields) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | simonw 9599 | 1 | 2019-06-15T19:34:41Z | 2019-07-08T15:44:51Z | OWNER | E.g. if a field contains "Tags,With,Commas" be able to facet them in the same way as |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/510/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
|||||||
462117311 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjIxMTczMTE= | 531 | /database/-/inspect | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-06-28T16:33:41Z | 2019-07-08T15:43:57Z | OWNER | Build It won't show table counts. Or maybe it will include them optionally but only for Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/465#issuecomment-506797086 |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/531/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
465327844 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ= | 553 | Potential improvements to facet-by-date | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-07-08T15:37:53Z | 2019-07-08T15:41:55Z | OWNER | In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696
Screenshot of that link: |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
465019882 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMTk4ODI= | 552 | Add --plugin-secret support to "datasette package" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2019-07-08T01:46:47Z | 2019-07-08T01:47:30Z | OWNER | Split out from #544. I think I should combine this with #347 (renaming |
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/552/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
||||||||
327395270 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjczOTUyNzA= | 296 | Per-database and per-table /-/ URL namespace | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2018-05-29T16:23:13Z | 2019-06-28T16:46:34Z | OWNER | Initially this will be for subsets of To start:
This means we will no longer allow databases or tables to have the name We will continue to support rows with a primary key of
|
datasette 107914493 | issue | { "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/296/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);